Obama may go to prison and be impreached for killing our own!!! [video]

reply to post by Common Good


I am not recopying your whole post because that would be a form of pollution and I am steadfastly against that, along with the rest of my party which stands on the right side of history although you may not want to grant them that right now. You are aware it takes a majority in congress and the Democrats don't have it so you are wrong. Effectively they cannot change anything without cooperation of the Majority GOP. Does the fact that Bohner is the MAJORITY LEADER mean anything to you. The MAJORITY. And they decided early on to hold this country hostage so they could win this election. Yeah, I want this unethical and heartless bunch of thieving miscreants in congress again.

Originally posted by newcovenant



The Red Cross asked people not to send food but said they need blood and money.

Ummm........That could be said of every government agency as well.....blood and money.......

YouSir

In an attempt to revive this thread please watch the video:

Bush Jr and Dick Cheney should have been impeached back in 2002 and convicted of wrong doing. Then tried in a criminal court of false flag genocide that killed 3,000 people in america. That would have prevented all the wars and sent the message that grand corruption is punished severly.

No president ever gets convicted during an impeachment. No president ever gets put in a criminal trial.

Bill Clinton got impeached for lying under oath about a sex scandal. What a #ing joke. Actually it is not even funny that americans are so immature they only prosecute sex scandals and watergate evesdropping. Good thing Bill Clinton was acquited and that is vindication of his excellent job in balancing the budget.

I could not care less if people are homosexuals or bisexuals, IF they DO THEIR JOB!

reply to post by EarthCitizen07


osner: Clinton’s Negligence Led to 9/11

Dave Eberhart and NewsMax.com Staff
Thursday, Sept. 4, 2003

Best-selling author Gerald Posner says much of the blame for 9/11 and the U.S. government’s negligence falls squarely on the shoulders of Bill Clinton and his administration.

In a stunning revelation made in his just released “Why America Slept: the Failure to Prevent 9/11” – Posner asserts the disaster of Sept. 11 could have been prevented and that President Clinton passed on more than one opportunity to arrest or kill Osama bin Laden.

Posner describes one incident in 1996 when Clinton passed on an easy opportunity to nab bin Laden.

“When bin Laden leaves the Sudan on a chartered commercial airliner with 150 of his top aides and his family, he goes to Qatar to refuel on his way to Pakistan,” Posner recounted to Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly Wednesday night.

Posner continued: “And Qatar, being an ally of the U.S. calls up and says ‘what should we do with this guy?’

“And the word comes back from the top of the [Clinton] administration ‘let him land and proceed on to Pakistan.’”

Posner’s revelations come on top of one previously reported on NewsMax.com - that Clinton himself admitted he turned down an offer by Sudanese authorities to have bin Laden extradited in 1996.

But Posner’s revelations show just how close U.S. authorities came to capturing bin Laden – but was allowed to go free and implement a worldwide terror spree.

“Why America Slept” paints a picture of gross negligence from the Clinton administration.


archive.newsmax.com...

reply to post by jimmiec


Maybe they did not have an arrest warrant for him yet, so they were forced to let him go?

Have you done any real research into 911 that killed 3,000 people and this attack that was later used as cannon fodder for the campaigns in afghanistan and iraq?





Then the democrats proceeded to let the republicans off the hook, which suggests both parties HAVE ONE BOSS!

Originally posted by YouSir

Originally posted by newcovenant



The Red Cross asked people not to send food but said they need blood and money.

Ummm........That could be said of every government agency as well.....blood and money.......

YouSir

True. I also thought of that too. We want your blood and your money! Star for you!

reply to post by jimmiec



Uh...Clinton attempted on at least one occasion to get Bin Laden. Do you remember that the Republicans were trying to impeach him during this time, so he had other things on his plate. How about blame the Republicans for partisan shenanigans and wasting the public's dollar and wasting Congress's time on the Lewinksy investigation and impeachment proceedings. They could have worked with Clinton to deal with this threat to the US, but they instead wanted to score political points against him. The GOP is for party over country.

What about George W. Bush? He was told that Al Queda planned multiple hijackings and terrorist attacks in the US, yet he, his administration and the FBI and CIA under him failed to protect this country. But you guys and gals are pissed that a four probable CIA agents got killed in a gun-running operation in Benghazi that went bad.

You right-wingers, Teabaggers and Republicans want to blame your political enemies for things your party's politicians are at least partly responsible for. You folks love to blame the other guy but pathologically cannot accept any responsibility for your own actions. HYPOCRITES!

The Bush family has been buddies and business associates of the Saudi royal family and the Bin Ladens for decades. Why don't you blame them? 19 of the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia.

Can someone summarize what the impeachable act is that Obama has allegedly committed?

Because making a military decision isn't an impeachable act, even if the rumors are true.

Originally posted by PvtHudson

Originally posted by MrInquisitive


And based on a Glen Beck rant. Seriously, folks who buy this stuff, you're demented and live in a bubble. Get help. Get out some time. And watch/listen to stuff besides FOX, Limbaugh, Beck and their fellow travelers online.

edit on 1-11-2012 by MrInquisitive because: (no reason given)

Yesterday the entire "Main Stream Media" was attacking Romney for gathering food and supplies for Sandy victims. Now THAT'S demented and desperate. That's your side.

Apparently you didn't hear/read the full story or get the memo from the Red Cross. This "Sandy donation" event was just a renamed campaign event. The Romney campaign bought $5000 in supplies ahead of time in case their supporters didn't show up with material donations. It was meant as a photo op. The Red Cross specifically asks that people not send material donations, but rather donate only money and blood because accepting material donations and sorting and checking them places unnecessary logistical burdens on the Red Cross. In this special case the RC accepted the offering but sent a reply which explicitly stated their donation policy. That the Romney campaign is so clueless about this or doesn't care and just wants to attempt to score a photo op shows the ignorance and/or character of Romney and his campaign lieutenants.

That this is your reponse to what I wrote is HILARIOUS. You, as usual, either don't know what you are talking about or are trying to "manipulate the facts" (for lack of a more courteous term for what you do, but that won't get this comment removed and ATS brownie points taken away from me).

reply to post by rolfharriss


I'm not naieve. I know full well presidents are just the puppets of the real power behind them. I do however have higher demands placed on the clowns i have to hire.

Originally posted by Vitruvian
Dead Thread sign

Based on the previous 10 postings - is there really any sense in continuing with this nonsense?

edit on 1-11-2012 by Vitruvian because: txt

There was no point to this thread in the first place. It is not breaking news and it is only hearsay. But apparently on ATS ridiculous, extreme, histrionic, hyperbolic threads get to stay in breaking news, but should someone have the temerity to create a thread about racist rhetoric at Romney campaign events and by Republican politicians campaigning for him, the thread gets moved to US political madness -- even though it is specifically about US presidential campaign election rhetoric.

As to why you want to abort this thread is because people are calling out the "non-truths", hearsay and manipulations of fact that are at the heart of this thread, and pointing out that Glen Beck is not a person to be believed.

Wasn't he saying recently even that the Bushes were in cahoots with the Muslim Brotherhood and the restoration of the Caliphate? Give me a break. The guy is either bonkers or just says the craziest stuff to get ratings/listeners. And people here at ATS think his ravings merit posts in "Breaking News".

reply to post by MrInquisitive


Actually what doomed this thread to the bone yard wasn't a lack of substance and truthfulness as pertains the excellently presented Glen Beck video - there is plenty of that to spare. What made it a dead thread is the fact of so many interlopers and nay-saying zealously protective shills attempting to prop up a dead administration - i.e., the totally corrupted BHO regime.

The confusing title didn't help things either "Obama may go to prison and be impreached for killing our own!!! [video]]

It maybe should have read "Obama could be impeached and face a prison sentence for assisting in the murder of four Americans" And the possibility of BHO's impeachment is not merely a politically motivated right wing fantasy, or even an empty "wishful thought." After all - Clinton committed far less of a crime than that - and Nixon merely lied.

As stated earlier:

Originally posted by Vitruvian

In an attempt to revive this thread please watch the video:

edit on 1-11-2012 by Vitruvian because: txt

Originally posted by Taiyed
Can someone summarize what the impeachable act is that Obama has allegedly committed?

Because making a military decision isn't an impeachable act, even if the rumors are true.

Anyone?

Anyone care to lay out what impeachable act Obama committed?

I'm not asking for the video, I want someone to say in their own words what they think Obama did to justify impeachment.

Originally posted by Taiyed

Originally posted by Taiyed
Can someone summarize what the impeachable act is that Obama has allegedly committed?

Because making a military decision isn't an impeachable act, even if the rumors are true.

Anyone?

Anyone care to lay out what impeachable act Obama committed?

I'm not asking for the video, I want someone to say in their own words what they think Obama did to justify impeachment.

edit on 1-11-2012 by Taiyed because: (no reason given)

Glen Beck did your work for you already - like I said above - Watch the video if you want to be informed as to what's happening in this thread.

reply to post by Vitruvian

Glen Beck did your work for you already - like I said above - Watch the video if you want to be informed as to what's happening in this thread.

I watched the video.

But I want YOU to say in your own words what Obama did that merits impeachment.

I am directly asking you or others that think Obama should be impeached, because I honestly don't think you have a clue what that may be. I think you watched a hyped up Glenn Beck, and he tricked you (like he does with his viewers) into thinking he made some grand point. But then you walk away from that video, and you really have no idea why you agree with him or what you beleive.

So please, tell me in your own words why you think Obama deserves to be impeached and sent to prison.

Originally posted by Taiyed
Can someone summarize what the impeachable act is that Obama has allegedly committed?

Because making a military decision isn't an impeachable act, even if the rumors are true.

Hey, you're spouting some commie-pinko/liberal/Muslim-Brotherhood/socialist/Islamofascist/hippie/OWS common sense there. How dare you!

Glen Beck says Obama should be impeached and imprisoned. If that ain't good enough fer yü, then you're not a patriotic GOP/Teabaggin'/right-wing/Obama-hating Amerrikun or a loyal lickspittle/toady ally. Shame on you. Your mother must be sorely disappointed in you -- as is your deity.

Originally posted by Vitruvian

Originally posted by Taiyed

Originally posted by Taiyed
Can someone summarize what the impeachable act is that Obama has allegedly committed?

Because making a military decision isn't an impeachable act, even if the rumors are true.

Anyone?

Anyone care to lay out what impeachable act Obama committed?

I'm not asking for the video, I want someone to say in their own words what they think Obama did to justify impeachment.

edit on 1-11-2012 by Taiyed because: (no reason given)

Glen Beck did your work for you already - like I said above - Watch the video if you want to be informed as to what's happening in this thread.

This is a better video to help you understand what's going on in this thread:




Or maybe we should remind people that Glenn compared the kids killed in the Norway massacre to the Hitler Youth?

Glenn is the clown prince of idiots.

In fact

Originally posted by MorpheusUSA
So how does one become impreached?
is this the act of preachers preaching you?
Or imps reaching you?

I think it has to do with media pimps overreaching.