It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The "rumor" that an engine was found several miles away, is just that...a rumor. A large part of one of the engines was found around 1,000 feet from the crash site, in line with the direction of travel of Flight 93 when it impacted the ground. In other words, it separated from the jet on impact and tumbled to its resting spot.
There is absolutely no evidence of ANY kind that Flight 93 was shot down. None. Nada. Zilch In fact, the available evidence indicates that Flight 93 was intact, up until it hit the ground.
For those of you who think it "vaporized", I hate to break it to you but there was pieces of airliner all over that crash site in addition to pieces of the passengers, crew and hijackers.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by maxella1
More often than not. Think about how often the media screws up stories.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by maxella1
No, they didnt have to correct EVERYTHING. But yes, they were making quite a few mistakes.
The one thing that most people do not realize is that even in the middle of a crisis, there are still a couple of people who sit and monitor the other networks to make sure they are scooping the competition. And when that happens, the fact checking flies out the window
Originally posted by JeZeus
For serious ? what evidence would that be ?
Originally posted by JrDavis
Planes have standards and need to be safe. They wouldn't put a plane into the air knowing that there is a risk if the plane goes down everything just....Vanishes.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Originally posted by JeZeus
For serious ? what evidence would that be ?
The fact that all the debris, except for light pieces, was all found in a very close area to the impact site. If it had been shot down, or if it had broken up in flight, then there would have been pieces much farther away from the impact site.
Anyway, there was a shot of flight 93 all in PIECES in someone's driveway with some trees around and in front of this guy's white garage. I was thinking whoa that guy had plane bits all over his driveway and yard etc.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by NWOwned
Anyway, there was a shot of flight 93 all in PIECES in someone's driveway with some trees around and in front of this guy's white garage. I was thinking whoa that guy had plane bits all over his driveway and yard etc.
I think I know what you are talking about. I vaguely remember that, or a similar interview. I'm positive one of the various 911 videos has it, maybe one of the loose change ones, i don't recall.
But it was someone miles away from the crater who indeed had a bunch of damage done to his property from debris. The report I remember was also mixing in people who reported seeing the plane on fire or smoking in the air before it crashed.
Honestly, I'm dumbfounded that none of the planes were shot down, so it does make sense to me that this one could have been. I really don't know, it's next to impossible to find the reports now, but I myself watched them on CNN, and I'm sure clips are in some 911 truth video somewhere.
It makes sense, it's policy to do that if needed, and also makes sense to say no, we didn't have to, those heros on the plane did it themselves.
IMO that plane was brought down, and the hero story was a cover to make it more palatable.