It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by mrdeadfolx
I thought since this is a discussion on ULF/ELF radio emissions, this may prove relevant.
ULF is the frequency range between 300 Hertz and 3 kilohertz. It is often used in mine and submarines communications, as it can penetrate earth and water.
The time and location of the ULF ‘blast’ detected coincides exactly with the time and locations of the tragic collapse of a nearly 2,000 foot long the Interstate 35W Bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota that killed at least a dozen people and seriously injured many others.
Here's the link if you're interested www.dailygalaxy.com...
According to this posting ( educate-yourself.org... ), this is a hoax and the SSRT reported no such ULF blast.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
Super-conductive antenna arrays.
Booyah.
That's not really a point of argument, is it?
HAARP has a large antenna array, because it must contend with normal conductivity for it's antennas... you know, because of the cost.
Whoops.... you goofed.
The storm runs on thermal energy.... the water vapor adds thermal energy to the system.
If you increase the average thermal energy of the storm, you increase its average strength.
A fully developed hurricane can release heat energy at a rate of 5 to 20x10^13 watts and converts less than 10% of the heat into the mechanical energy of the wind. The heat release is equivalent to a 10-megaton nuclear bomb exploding every 20 minutes. According to the 1993 World Almanac, the entire human race used energy at a rate of 10^13 watts in 1990, a rate less than 20% of the power of a hurricane.
I clearly also said Radio waves...
I clearly also ALSO said that you might not even need the ionospheric bounce.
Are you saying that the information regarding ionospheric probing for refraction wasn't gathered by the HAARP?
That this information couldn't be used in a different emitter?
Really?
Unless you use superconductive antenna elements, which would make them more compact.
Originally posted by mrdeadfolx
I thought since this is a discussion on ULF/ELF radio emissions, this may prove relevant.
Russia’s Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics located in Irkutsk reported recently that their Siberian Solar Radio Telescope (SSRT) detected a ‘massive’ ultra low frequency (ULF) ‘blast’ emanating from Latitude: 45° 00′ North Longitude: 93° 15′ West.
ULF is the frequency range between 300 Hertz and 3 kilohertz. It is often used in mine and submarines communications, as it can penetrate earth and water.
The time and location of the ULF ‘blast’ detected coincides exactly with the time and locations of the tragic collapse of a nearly 2,000 foot long the Interstate 35W Bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota that killed at least a dozen people and seriously injured many others.
Here's the link if you're interested www.dailygalaxy.com...
Originally posted by Jacob1080David
whoever wrote that extreme evil doesnt exist, is just a typical ignorant human. they will all be squashed like the pathetic bugs they are. this hurricane is a symbol of the dooms they will continue to wreak upon us.
The total energy flow represented
by these spectra is fairly large. It was 472
ergs/cm2 sec on June 24 (A.M.), 18 ergs/cm2 sec
on June 24 (P.M.), and 677 ergs/cm2 on May 15.
The computed energy flux out of the lower
troposphere for November 10, is very large
(964 ergs/cm2 sec). However, the temperature
sounding shows an adiabatic layer higher in the
troposphere on this day, and most of the energy
must have been reflected at this level. For this
reason the spectrum of vertical energy flux for
November 10 is probably not realistic and is
not shown.
Apparently the vertical energy flow can
amount to as much as 1000 ergs/cm2 sec. This
is seen to be fairly large when compared with
the total rate of turbulent dissipation of energy
in a unit column of atmosphere which is about
4500 ergs/cm2 sec. Records of wave activity as
prominent as those shown are rare, occurring
only a few times a year in southern California.
However, an energy flux of 50 to 100 ergs/cm2
sec is associated with many storms and frontal
systems.
A dipole antenna of insufficient length is inefficient. A superconductive dipole antenna of insufficient length is similarly inefficient.
You also need some resistance across an antenna or otherwise you would be unable to get a potential difference.
Conductivity isn't a huge issue. It's the wavelength compared to the antenna size. You can't do a proper job of emitting a wave from an antenna that's very small compared to the wavelength. And in this case, what you could pack on the top of a sub would be VERY disparate.
At that rate of heat release, your little fleet of nuclear subs isn't contributing much.
Microwaves ARE radio waves.
Really. You're apparently missing a big chunk of understanding of basic radio physics and the history of same.
Again, absolutely wrong. You can use superconductive matching systems to improve things, but your radiation efficiency is still going to suck. And you still can't beamform with it.
I just KNOW you're going to post a zillion links to anything you can find with "superconducting antenna" in.
but while the keywords look interesting it doesn't allow you to make teeny tiny HF arrays.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by chr0naut
A dipole antenna of insufficient length is inefficient. A superconductive dipole antenna of insufficient length is similarly inefficient.
Linear Phased Array. Boom.
You also need some resistance across an antenna or otherwise you would be unable to get a potential difference.
Inductive Reactance, Double Boom.edit on 8-11-2012 by ErtaiNaGia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
Linear Phased Array.... Again.... Boom.
Oh wow.... you just gave me a really good idea...
Using the ships THEMSELVES as the antennas of the phased array.
Ha, completely circumvents your little "Problems", don't it?
It doesn't really matter anyway... as you could use a reflective dish behind a linear array to increase the gain of the beam.
Well, you are wrong there too.
Linear Phased Array.
Originally posted by chr0naut
MOOB (which is a "boom" reflected back at you).
Originally posted by liejunkie01
reply to post by Bedlam
I have a question.
It seems that you are knowledgable in the antenna field.
I have not read anything about computers being used along with the arrays to help distinguish frequencies.
From what I am getting from your replies, you seem to be speaking in analog terms and not the digital computing age.
I was wondering that on the day of supercomputers and awesome amplifiers if maybe you could set an array up where it can send and recieve multiple frequencies, high and low, and let the computing power distinguish which is best to be used, or that needs to be heard.
Again I am just curious because we have came along way since these machines/devices have been made.
Are you saying it is impossible to retrofit an existing setup with a computer technology to enhance an arrays capabilities?
Originally posted by badgerprints
IF this were HAARP, why?
It's only an advantage if Obama can save the whole north eastern seaboard at once.
Unless Mitt Romney has HAARP on speed dial.
Hmmm...
The "Linear Phased Array" for HAARP consists of multiple tuned dipoles. Please read the HAARP specs on the website. MOOB (which is a "boom" reflected back at you).
Inductive reactance implies coiled elements where the magnetic field lines can interact with each other, inducing a phase delay as electromotive force is converted to magnetic field and then back to EMF - what part of the word "linear" did you not understand? MOOB, MOOB.
Due to the wonderful weirdness of superconductors, only the top (approx.) 100 nm of a superconductor can actually provide any useful reactance at all (this is called the London distance, which is due to the Meissner effect, which expels magnetic field lines, making inductive reactivity impossible within the bulk of a superconductor). Put simply, coupled with the problem of measuring any potential difference across a superconductor (because they superconduct!), means that superconductors make pretty lousy inductors. MOOB, MOOB, MOOB!
Minimal spacing required of an array, it's related to the wavelength. Moob.
The spacing and geometry are sort of critical. Also, the ships are immersed (at least partially...) in a conductor. Also getting the phasing right if they're spread out like that would be painful.
The spacing and geometry are sort of critical.
the ships are immersed (at least partially...) in a conductor. Also getting the phasing right if they're spread out like that would be painful.
Ask yourself...what is the minimum size of a reflective dish, as relates to the wavelength you're trying to reflect/focus?
Spacing.
Originally posted by chr0naut
MOOB (which is a "boom" reflected back at you).
Bizarre. I used "moob" before I read this post.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by chr0naut
MOOB (which is a "boom" reflected back at you).
Bizarre. I used "moob" before I read this post.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
Depends on the polarization, doesn't it?
Oh, yeah.... because they can't use GPS to make their position known, can they?
ieeexplore.ieee.org...
You people are just transparent, honestly...
You do realize that our NAVAL FLEETS use radio communication every day.... and *THOSE SHIPS* are partially submerged in the water....
Christ... what is wrong with you?
Depends on the polarization, but you wouldn't really need the reflector anyway... I was just trying to increase the gain.... lol
Spacing.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
That's because you are both being controlled by the Mind control satellite grid.