It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Son of Will
MK-Ultra is so... 1980s.
Originally posted by r2d246
reply to post by UltraMarine
I have my doubts they were stabbed by the nanny. And then she stabs herself? GET REAL. What proof is there? It was probably a set up. Likely something to do with the law suit. They maybe got a hitman in to set it up.
Originally posted by TheLegend
Originally posted by Kali74
The conspiracy angle makes no sense here. I could understand it if were someone involved in the lawsuit, but not a reporter that was simply reporting a matter of public record. Just more conspiracy vultures circling more tragic deaths. It's getting beyond disgusting. Two children were murdered ffs, sometimes people really do need to take a step and stfu.
Indeed, it is horrible that 2 children died, but to not examine this from every angle would be an injustice to them. It's like 9/11 and how some, especially in the MSM, say that 3,000 people died so you should "be respectful and not question anything about it" - that never made sense to me. This is a conspiracy site before anything else. We're not all insensitive, but have to tackle it from a "who has what to gain?" angle.... Even when it gets repetitive.edit on 27-10-2012 by TheLegend because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Son of Will
MK-Ultra is so... 1980s.
Nowadays, the technology has improved vastly beyond such messy and time-consuming, not to mention inefficient, methods. Just earlier today someone posted a thread on Remote Neural Monitoring. But it goes far beyond "monitoring", and includes the ability to "implant" visual, audio, or emotional signals, or even to implant thoughts and influence behavior.
With today's global technological apparatus of space-based and ground-based transmitters/receivers, practically infinite sources of income, fire-power, man-power, and the ability to tap the best and brightest that humanity has to offer, all protected by obsessively redundant layers of secrecy, the above scenario is not only possible but very probable.
Originally posted by calstorm
In an article I read last night, (can't find it now) said that the nanny murdered the children and then turned the knife on herself stabbing herself in the neck. seemed suspicious to me.
Originally posted by Enlightenme1111
I've never seen so much propaganda and agenda coercion packed into a story as I have this one from the dailymail...
Brave six-year-old girl tried to fight off 'killer' nanny: Tragic last moments of the children stabbed to death by carer in New York apartment
Not surprisingly, they are not accepting comments for this fiction.
The superintendent of the building where Ortega lives said that the nanny is “a very nice woman” and “very religious,” continuing, “To me, she has always been very, very stable.”
Originally posted by gps777
Originally posted by Ulyeney
Unless the nanny was MK-ULTRAd and was supposed to die after her deed was committed. In another article quoted further up the mother said she saw the nanny turn the knife on herself.
If they wanted an MK-ULTRA scapegoat,they wouldn`t need to put in a nanny.
Think of all the variables,they`d have to want a nanny,then hire that paticular nanny,be satisfied with the nanny over time, etc etc rather than just a random MK-ULTRA scapegoat who could commit a punishment toward the family from off the street.
And, as Foster Gamble revealed in his groundbreaking independent film Thrive, we could have ended poverty and environmental destruction for as little as 200 billion dollars a year.
Instead of doing any of this, the "one percent" continued to live the lifestyles of the rich and famous -- while the poor sank ever deeper into the Next Great Depression, as economist Paul Krugman recently called it.
The GAO [audit] also revealed that many of the people who serve as directors of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks come from the exact same financial institutions that the Fed is in charge of regulating.
Further, the GAO found that at least 18 current and former Fed board members were affiliated with banks and companies that received emergency loans from the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis.
In other words, the people "regulating" the banks were the exact same people who were being "regulated." Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse!...
Originally posted by r2d246
reply to post by UltraMarine
I have my doubts they were stabbed by the nanny. And then she stabs herself? GET REAL. What proof is there? It was probably a set up. Likely something to do with the law suit. They maybe got a hitman in to set it up.