It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
2005: Superbug linked to flesh-eating disease
Doctors have reported an alarming number of MRSA patients being attacked by a life-threatening flesh-eating infection in the US.
The patients seem to have caught a new form of the notorious "superbug" outside hospital. Several developed complications and needed lengthy stays in intensive care and reconstructive surgery.
The doctors, who identified 14 such patients during 15 months at their medical centre in Los Angeles County, California, warn in the New England Journal of Medicine that clinicians may not recognise that necrotising fasciitis, as the flesh-eating condition is properly known, can be caused by MRSA.
2008: The Great MRSA Epidemic: Is It Time to Worry?
Flesh-eating bacteria. A drug-resistant menace, spreading silently through hospital hallways.
If one were asked to come up with a recipe for a panic-inducing disease, it would be hard to come up with something more horrifying than methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus -- or MRSA.
2012: 'Flesh-eating' bacteria strain spread by sneezes and coughs
London - Medical experts in the UK have warned the public to be vigilant about their health to guard against infection by a highly infectious strain of MRSA called USA300, that causes a deadly form of pneumonia, skin boils and abscesses.
The deadly bacteria can be easily passed between people in public places through sneezes and coughs and through contact with the skin of an infected person.
…'Community-acquired strains better at infecting the young and healthy'
PHYSorg.com explains that the hospital strains cause disease in hospital patients who are already weakened by illness. Medical institutions have in recent years been making progress in controlling the hospital strains. They are now concerned about the emergence of the community-acquired strains which attack young healthy people.
Thomas said that community-acquired strains are better at infecting young and healthy people because, unlike the hospital strains that are exposed to powerful drugs and disinfectants, community-acquired strains have not invested genetic resources to developing resistance to man-made agents. They are, therefore, able to develop more powerful disease causing toxins….
MRSA Bacteria Facts Information and Treatment Options
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a bacterium responsible for several difficult-to-treat infections in humans. It may also be called multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA).
MRSA is, by definition, any strain of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that has developed resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, which include the penicillins (methicillin, dicloxacillin, nafcillin, oxacillin, etc.) and the cephalosporins.
…MRSA stands for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. …MRSA is so named because it cannot be treated by most of the known antibiotics - making it possibly deadly to those who are infected. …
Most people have heard about the recent rash of MRSA staph infections that have been found in schools and other communities in the United States. For those of you who aren't aware of what MRSA is, it's a deadly flesh eating bacteria that has taken thousands of lives globally each year…
Originally posted by Komonazmuk
reply to post by soficrow
A bit of fear mongering on the OP's part;
Though most MRSA infections aren't serious, some can be life-threatening. Many public health experts are alarmed by the spread of tough strains of MRSA. Because it's hard to treat, MRSA is sometimes called a "super bug."
www.webmd.com...
I don't want either MRSA or "flesh eating disease" but OP was misleading.
The consequences of MRSA bacteremia are clear—many patients will die or experience a decline from their baseline clinical condition. The adjusted risk difference enables clinicians to use a targeted approach, directed toward patients with the highest risk for death—i.e., the elderly, patients with liver cirrhosis, patients with renal insufficiency, and patients from nursing homes.
Invasive Infections
•In 2005, about 94,000 persons developed their first invasive (i.e., serious) MRSA infection, of which approximately 19,000 died. Of these infections, about 86% are healthcare-associated and 14% are community-associated. (Klevens et al. Journal of the American Medical Association 2007;298(15):1763-1771 [PDF 229KB/9 pages]
edit on 22-10-2012 by Gridrebel because: (no reason given)
We had a battle with MRSA several years back. 3 out of 4 people in the house had it after being unknowingly exposed by a kid that spent the night. MRSA is a variety of staph infection that is VERY contagious and highly resistant to antibiotics. It took almost a year to get rid of it ...numerous rounds of different combinations of medicines to get rid of it, and endless hours upon hours of cleaning and sterilizing every surface in the house, cars, etc.
MRSA is not the same as the flesh eating bacteria, but it is tough and can kill you if it goes untreated.
I have had two bouts with MRSA ...Contrary to what has been stated here, it does not "only affect people with compromised immune systems". However, they are the ones that are most likely to die from this infection or suffer serious consequences from it in a very short period of time.
Other than advanced arthritis in my hip, I am in good health, and take care of myself. If I had a compromised immune system, I most likely would have died, or lost my arm (first instance) or my foot/leg (second instance).
Flesh eating disease is caused by the same bacteria as MRSA
Necrotizing fasciitis or NF, commonly known as flesh-eating disease or flesh-eating bacteria syndrome,[1] is a rare infection of the deeper layers of skin and subcutaneous tissues, easily spreading across the fascial plane within the subcutaneous tissue. …
Type I describes a polymicrobial infection, whereas Type II describes a monomicrobial infection. Many types of bacteria can cause necrotizing fasciitis (e.g., Group A streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes), Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Bacteroides fragilis, Aeromonas hydrophila[3]).
Historically, Group A streptococcus made up most cases of Type II infections. However, since as early as 2001, another serious form of monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis has been observed with increasing frequency,[5] caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
MRSA is not the flesh eating disease that makes so many headlines. It is dangerous for sure....but it lives on your skin.
The real threat, and flesh eater, is strep. Yup, that same infection that gives you a sore throat. That is where the risk is. MRSA is typically a threat to someone with a decreased immune system. Strep, however, is what has been in the headlines.
A bit of fear mongering on the OP's part;
2005: Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Its Emerging Virulence
Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections are an emerging problem in the United States and many parts of the world. These infections originate in communities as opposed to hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) infections. If adequate measures are not taken to thoroughly understand and control its changing epidemiology and clinical presentation, it may become a significant public health problem in the near future.
2005: Necrotizing Fasciitis Caused by Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles
Necrotizing fasciitis is a life-threatening infection requiring urgent surgical and medical therapy. Staphylococcus aureus has been a very uncommon cause of necrotizing fasciitis, but we have recently noted an alarming number of these infections caused by community- associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA).
2006: Community-associated MRSA: Superbug at our doorstep
Clones of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) are spreading with alarming rapidity and are replacing methicillin-sensitive strains of S. aureus as the most common cause of skin and soft-tissue infection. Methicillin resistance among community isolates of S. aureus has already exceeded a staggering 70% in Houston2 and Atlanta3 and threatens to emerge in force north of the border. CA-MRSA is an “old foe with new fangs”4: a pathogen combining virulence, resistance and an ability to disseminate at large.5 Most CA-MRSA infections involve the skin and soft tissue; however, severe and sometimes fatal infections have been observed, including sepsis, necrotizing pneumonia, purpura fulminans, pyomyositis and necrotizing fasciitis, even in healthy patients.
2008: Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections (SSTI's) Caused by Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection has become epidemic.
…In the United States, a single clone of CA-MRSA (USA 300 ST-8) has become the most prevalent cause of staphylococcal SSTI acquired in the community…
…SSTIs due to CA-MRSA predominantly affect children, young adults, and middle-aged adults [7, 8, 13, 43, 44]. The median age for adults infected with CA-MRSA ranges from 20 to 47 years [6, 44, 45]. …Many patients with CA-MRSA infections do not have recognized risk factors for the acquisition of MRSA
CA-MRSA strains can produce a variety of SSTIs, ranging from impetigo to life-threatening necrotizing fasciitis…
In general, the prognosis for patients with SSTI due to CA-MRSA is very good. Death is quite uncommon, and the rate is certainly lower than that among patients infected with nosocomial MRSA [6]. However, the recurrence of lesions is frequent [28, 68].
2008:The reported number of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections is increasing rapidly. ...
…CA-MRSA is associated with invasive infections, including necrotizing fasciitis (3), sepsis (4), and pneumonia (5). The USA300 strain, which is also found in Europe (6), was first isolated in the Netherlands in 2002.
2009: Managing CA-MRSA Infections
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) must be recognized now as one of the most common causes of infections acquired in the community. The majority of these infections involve the skin and soft tissue structures and confer significant morbidity on those affected. In addition, serious invasive and often fatal episodes of necrotizing pneumonia, necrotizing fasciitis, endocarditis, and sepsis are being reported with increased frequency.
reply to post by TheOtter
I have dealt with MRSA since a hospital visit a year ago. It was nasty and stubborn to get rid of. I took a combination of three antibiotics for months, washed with Hibiclens (chlorhexidine glauconite) daily.
Originally posted by Muckster
reply to post by soficrow
Sorry, i'm no expert, but i thought that the "flesh eating bug" and "MRSA" were two different things.
Flesh eating bug
MRSA
Type I describes a polymicrobial infection, whereas Type II describes a monomicrobial infection. Many types of bacteria can cause necrotizing fasciitis (e.g., Group A streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes), Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Bacteroides fragilis, Aeromonas hydrophila[3]). Such infections are more likely to occur in people with compromised immune systems.[4]
Historically, Group A streptococcus made up most cases of Type II infections. However, since as early as 2001, another serious form of monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis has been observed with increasing frequency,[5] caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
Originally posted by mblahnikluver
This scares me more than any other disease or plague out there. Something about flesh eating doesn't sound right.
If this was created and it got "loose" then who let it loose?