It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Washington Times notes:
U.S. Rep. Peter T. King, New York Republican and Chairman of the House’s Homeland Security Committee, said Tuesday that al Qaeda is a greater threat now than it was before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
“That is the consensus of most intelligence experts,” he said on CNN’s “Starting Point.”
If King is right, then it shows that America’s anti-terrorism policies since 9/11 have been a dismal failure. 1
Why?
D’oh! We’re Supporting Terrorists
Initially – in the name of fighting our enemies – the U.S. has directly been supporting Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups for the last decade. See this, this, this, this and this.
If Al Qaeda is a greater threat now than before 9/11, maybe it’s because – oh, I don’t know – we’re supporting them?
Our Program of Torture Created Terrorists
Killing innocent civilians is one of the main things which increases terrorism. As one of the top counter-terrorism experts (the former number 2 counter-terrorism expert at the State Department) told me, starting wars against states which do not pose an imminent threat to America’s national security increases the threat of terrorism because:
One of the principal causes of terrorism is injuries to people and families.
(Indeed, Al Qaeda wasn’t even in Iraq until the U.S. invaded that country.)
And top CIA officers say that drone strikes increase terrorism (and see this).
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
SO, by your logic and in your own opinion, we the innocents, should just lay down, let the terrorists walk all over us, slaughter our loved ones as they wish, and let them force whatever they wish upon our throats?
Do know that innocent people did not bomb or kill or torture any of the terrorists or their families. They did to us all first.
SO, by your logic and in your own opinion, we the innocents, should just lay down, let the terrorists walk all over us, slaughter our loved ones as they wish, and let them force whatever they wish upon our throats?
Do know that innocent people did not bomb or kill or torture any of the terrorists or their families. They did to us all first.
Had the terrorists sought for justice or societal progress in the humane way? None. They rejected ALL offers of even negotiations, and sought for annihilation for anyone who stood in their way, leaving mankind with no choice but to react and defend themselves.
Thus, before you blame the innocent ones, do look closely at whom the terrorists truly are, and why they existed and continue to exists. It is people with blindness, ignorance, hatred for authority, hatred for the west and rule of law, that allows them to grow and fester.
Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for a religious, political or, ideological goal; and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (civilians).
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
reply to post by DarknStormy
If you insist, as you always do on other threads relating to such issues to defend your beloved humanslayers, by re-writing history as it suits you and your kind - YOU are part of the problem and we humanity will never be able to find a solution.
But still, it is your right to write as it pleases you, even if you prefer falsehoods than truths. Ignorance can be bliss, I supposed. and my efforts to set the record straight with you will be only be in vain.
No offense intended. I wrote this reply with only a heavy heart as I watched the humanslayers continued onslaught upon humanity around our world, with more preferring apathy, cowardice, lies than truth and action.
What's pathetic are your often generalizations and lumping every error or right actions done to protect innocents as another hostile act upon terrorists.
You may claim to be a terrorist as you wrote in your post, But I and many other innocents had hurt and harmed no one, but only defended ourselves, or lend our support in the defense of such. Any who deviate from such defenses MUST be proven guilty by a court of law, NOT just by your sweeping generalizations or mythical presumptions alone.
Originally posted by Logarock
Its not going to be very hard to get "blow back" out of folks that shoot little girls that want an education.
Originally posted by DarknStormy
If you look at their situation from their point of view, you can understand why they would attack invaders. I know there are hardcore extremists but the way things have panned out, you can hardly blame branded so-called terrorists (who could have lost friends and family because of the invasions) for fighting back.
Originally posted by AccessDenied
Funny how acts of terrorism seemed to be defined by whomever opposes western culture and society and not by their actions.
Originally posted by DarknStormy
Originally posted by Logarock
Its not going to be very hard to get "blow back" out of folks that shoot little girls that want an education.
See that is something right there that needs to be sorted out. Shooting 14 yr old girls who stand up for their rights is nothing less than wrong. But where did that happen? Afghanistan, Iraq?