It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eletheia
reply to post by andy06shake
If thats the case they need treatment and not collusion to keep up their addiction. Smokers
get help to stop smoking getting perscriptions for nicotine patches etc? Drug addicts get
substitutes and counselling? So why does the alcholic get just what they need to fuel their
habit?
In the long term health issues regarding the liver etc.make it an increasing burden and cost
to the NHS. Surely a very short sighted solution ?
Originally posted by Sostratus
reply to post by dayve
Thats like giving your kid an allowance and telling them what they can and cant buy...
Actually it's nothing like that, allowance is given for doing chores - it is earned.
So what if they are less fortunate
So what if they are, I already said I don't mind my money helping them, please explain how alcohol & tobacco helps them.
Originally posted by Lulzaroonie
As it says in the OP, there is no stipulation with any benefit that you have to buy/use it for whatever it is supposed to be for.
Even housing benefit, if it doesn't go directly to the landlord, can be spent on anything else. There's nothing to say you HAVE to give the money to your landlord. That's just what that money is supposed to be for.
Seems to me that Iain Duncan Smith is trying to implement food stamps in the UK.
Personally, I think that something should be done. But I don't know what. I know a couple of families with kids who are pretty much neglected because the parents prefer to buy booze or fags. It's selfish and irresponsible.
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Hey! I have a GREAT idea!!!
OK, so we take the folks that are getting welfare/foodstamps/assistance and are able bodied and under a certain age without any extreme illnesses that would prevent them, and we have them show up at a certain place every day and perform activities that determines how much assistance they get. If they don't show up, they don't get the assitance that was attributed to that day. If they don't perform the activities, they either get kicked out of the program or lose a certain amount of assistance. The assistance will be totally dependent upon their own actions!
...oh wait.... that's a job isn't it? And the assistance would be called a "pay check"?? Wow
hmmmmm
....of course that would require that we also provide opportunities for jobs that people can go to instead of refusing to hire new people because the people in charge want to ensure that certain people don't get re- elected...
We got out of the depression with the public works program. If we want out of this one, we're going to have to do something similar.
Public work programs sound like a great idea, your right it worked for the U.S. Got them out of the depression.
I just hope that they pay a fair days wage for a fair days work. And not like £10 - £20 extra on to of your JSA!
edit on 17-10-2012 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)edit on 17-10-2012 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Pretty simple and straight forward really isn't it.
I think politicians, bankers, industrialists and the associated media deliberately over complicate things.
Originally posted by paraphi
reply to post by andy06shake
Define "fair pay". All the other benefits aside, in the UK the Job Seekers allowance is c. £110 per week. If a normal working week is 40 hours, then that's £2.75 an hour for doing nothing.
Regards
Originally posted by paraphi
reply to post by andy06shake
Define "fair pay". All the other benefits aside, in the UK the Job Seekers allowance is c. £110 per week. If a normal working week is 40 hours, then that's £2.75 an hour for doing nothing.
Regards