It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lone12
reply to post by primalfractal
. . . - about that google doodle though:
it had nothing to do with 'Bohr '
but the atom on the doodle is a stylyzed depiction of the Flower Of Life, encompassing Earth
= the 144 crystal geometric grid
Originally posted by Lone12
..the proof is on 'bohrs wiki page ': the Tao symbol
and the phrase ' opposites complete eachother '
protected by the elephant = hindu Ganesha, " guard of the garden [ of eden ] "
soon, this Grid will ignite
and kudalini will sweep over earth
...making earth a prison of false light
Originally posted by primalfractal
I CAN MATHEMATICALLY PROVE THE DIVINE NOW
Originally posted by subject x
Originally posted by primalfractal
I CAN MATHEMATICALLY PROVE THE DIVINE NOW
So can you show us the math?
I'm not seeing the God connection here, but I'd be interested in your calculations.
Originally posted by primalfractal
He showed that these curving light waves would exist in 3D-n or beyond the 3rd dimension.
Originally posted by Philodemus
reply to post by ErgoTheConclusion
Well spoken.
On a far more rudimentary level, there is simply no way of inferring the absolute of “god” or “divine”.
Originally posted by Philodemus
Discovering a creator and/or designer, if at all possible, does not imply the discovery of god/divine. It is simply arcane due to our very palpable mortality.
Originally posted by Philodemus
I do not oppose the nomenclature employed for things like “god particle” and “goddess wave” because I understand that it is an attempt to signify the consequence or role these things play. But do not expect me to actually take their presumed (or eventual actual) existence as genuine evidence of an actual god. And certainly don’t ask me to presume his benevolence.
Really? you mean 2 people on a forum did not call you an idiot.. proof pls
With the help of professional Quantum physicists I have designed an experiment
Along with the stick I've given a carrot - A legitimate design to make a black hole based on my theory
So I have a legitimate new, logical quantum theory with an experiment designed to prove that Curving 3D-n light wave paths exist. Here's where it gets trippy. David Bohm (famous physicist and Einstein contemporary) predicted the existence of these curving light wave paths, but had no theory for proof. I do and I have an experiment designed to test it.
Perhaps we could discuss the philosophical and metaphysical aspects of this discovery?.
"All that is knows no other. This does not mean that there may not be more to know. It does not know whether or not other psychic gestalts like It may exist. It is not aware of them if they do exist. It is constantly searching."
"The only real wisdom is knowing you know nothing." - Socrates