It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mademyself1984
reply to post by nixie_nox
I'm aware of that being the reason interstates were constructed. Which was not so they could be "shut down" for military movements; simply to make moving equipment or soldiers from point a.) to point b.) much more efficient.
And also for evacuation. It is a dual purpose.
However...I have been a part of more military movements than you have ever seen, and rest assured, the interstate was never once shut down.
That might also depend on location and accessibility.
Explain to me, exactly, how that would work. Military vehicle sets up a few barriers and parks, and tells approaching vehicles they are going to be sitting here for 2 hours, because they cannot pass, for an unspecified reason?Every vehicle that is already beyond this "choke point" is flagged down and ordered to stop? Cover your eyes until we pass!"?
Shows how much you know. Since that is not how it works. In order to manage this, it is a collaboration between military and state agencies. The media has to be notified to report that the highway is closed from such and such a time. The state highway administration puts out the overhead and highway notifications. Then the LEO,state highway agencies, and state troopers close the exits.
Pretty much the same thing they do for large accidents or construction, that close the highways.
Though the Eisenhower interstate system is federal, it is still up to the local and state governments to maintain the effectiveness and safety of those highways. And the military must comply with the regulations that the state or locals set.
Maybe in your area your locals didn't feel the need to shut down the interstate, in mine they do, probably about once a year. For example, if something is being moved that is exceeding bridge weight limits, do you really think that they will allow other civilian vehicles to cross those bridges along with the oversized equipment?
They may not do this for small movements, but large ones, yes.Or oversized loads. Which is why civilians don't see any movements larger then a handful of vehicles.
Cite one example in which the interstate was shut down by the military for 2 hours, that you can personally prove or attest to. Because it doesn't happen.edit on 10/9/2012 by mademyself1984 because: forgot to add...edit on 10/9/2012 by mademyself1984 because: sp
I work for one of the coordinating state agencies.
Originally posted by ANOK
'Communist' president?
I wouldn't take this story too seriously.
East Coast Bases Being Evacuated
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
You do know about it, they just don't advertise it.
Next time your local interstate is shut down for 2 hours, but construction or accident isn't listed, that is a military movement.
Originally posted by Rubicant13
Was trolling around the interwebs today when I noticed an interesting article about east coast military bases being evacuated. I read the blurb on it, and I am not sure what to think about it.
Because at the 8 minute 30 second mark of the video below, John Moore takes a call from a caller wondering if John had received any further information about ‘anything happening on the East Coast’. John responds “well, we did get an update last night, nothing shocking news so much as confirmation of things we’re getting from other sources. Information that first of all the East Coast military bases are being evacuated under the cover of darkness in the middle of the night using secondary roads. Of course, they aren’t using the word evacuate, that’s my terminology, but they’re relocating, taking out the heavy, expensive equipment and supplies and they’re going to high ground. And, second confirmation when we wake up one morning and there’s Canadian and Mexican troops in the United States to help us in our ‘time of need’, then we’ll know that we’re real close to everything falling apart. So that’s the confirmations we got yesterday afternoon.” Further..”and they’ll be invited in by the Communist president that we’ve got…”
The source also has a 40 minute video by John Moore discussing atmospheric changes in the gulf stream, as described as erratic or slowing down and even stopping. It seems that the author of the article is trying make a connection between his intel and this video story.
I have no idea as for whether this is true or not. What do think?
Original source:
reinep.wordpress.com...
**mods move this post to where needed. I was not sure what forum to post it in.**edit on 8-10-2012 by Rubicant13 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by KaiserSoze
Originally posted by ANOK
'Communist' president?
I wouldn't take this story too seriously.
That might be the only factual part of it, so yeah I see what you mean.