It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Charlie Fuqua, the Republican candidate for the Arkansas House of Representatives who called for expelling Muslims from the United States in his book, also wrote in support for instituting the death penalty for "rebellious children."
In "God's Law," Fuqua's 2012 book, the candidate wrote that while parents love their children, a process could be set up to allow for the institution of the death penalty for "rebellious children," according to the Arkansas Times. Fuqua, who is anti-abortion, points out that the course of action involved in sentencing a child to death is described in the Bible and would involve judicial approval. While it is unlikely that many parents would seek to have their children killed by the government, Fuqua wrote, such power would serve as a way to stop rebellious children.
"I think my views are fairly well-accepted by most people," Fuqua said to AP.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Talk about delusional -
"I think my views are fairly well-accepted by most people," Fuqua said to AP.
Little Tommy forgot to make his bed before school on Monday.
On Tuesday his classmates wondered where little Tommy was.
edit on 8-10-2012 by Asktheanimals because: added comment
Originally posted by jimmiec
Well it does happen. I had a friend who lived in a very small town. A family moved there with their teenage son who had joined a gang. They moved there to get away from the big city and get their boy out of gang life. Instead of turning his life around he started a gang with the local boys. They found him floating in the lake not long after. I certainly would not condone anything like that but at least he got to live, unlike the 40 million aborted since 1974.
The study's findings indicate that honor killings accelerated significantly in a 20-year period between 1989 and 2009.[6] This may mean that honor killings are genuinely escalating, perhaps as a function of jihadist extremism and Islamic fundamentalism, or that honor killings are being more accurately reported and prosecuted, especially in the West, but also in the East. The expansion of the Internet may account for wider reporting of these incidents.
The worldwide average age of victims for the entire population is twenty-three (Table 1). This is true for all geographical regions. Thus, wherever an honor killing is committed, it is primarily a crime against young people. Just over half of these victims were daughters and sisters; about a quarter were wives and girlfriends of the perpetrators. The remainder included mothers, aunts, nieces, cousins, uncles, or non-relatives.
Originally posted by dawnstar
can we give those rebellous politicians the death sentence when they refuse to listen to we the people also???
it's insane that these quacks actually make it into office!!!
Originally posted by jimmiec
Well it does happen. I had a friend who lived in a very small town. A family moved there with their teenage son who had joined a gang. They moved there to get away from the big city and get their boy out of gang life. Instead of turning his life around he started a gang with the local boys. They found him floating in the lake not long after. I certainly would not condone anything like that but at least he got to live, unlike the 40 million aborted since 1974.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by mahatche
It's one thing to say such a thing, quite another to do it. I can say that I would've been okay with Jeffrey Dahmer being put down. Hitler. John Wayne Casey. Manson.
Didn't Carroll O'Connor go after the drug dealer when his son died of an overdose? I bet he wouldn't have minded if the parents had put their son down.
What about underage pedophiles or rapists?
I think everyone in a community (EXCEPT THE PARENTS) wouldn't fight too hard to save the life of a bully terrorizing all the kids at school, or gun-toting gang members.
Again, it's one thing to say it, but I wouldn't vote for it.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by dawnstar
can we give those rebellous politicians the death sentence when they refuse to listen to we the people also???
it's insane that these quacks actually make it into office!!!
It's even worse...a ton of them sit on SCIENCE COMMITTEES!!
I mean, one of those guys thinks MORE rain forests should be cut down because that will prevent greenhouse gases. How on earth does someone so stupid get elected in the first place??? Even if you don't believe in global climate change, saying that cutting down more forests prevents greenhouse gases should lead to an auto-resignation. No ifs or buts...if you're THAT DUMB you deserve to be kicked out, and the same goes for this silly "let's put kids on death row if they're disobedient" clown.