Signs accumulate that liberals are embarrassed by Obama - The tides have turned

reply to post by hoochymama

Maybe looking beyond the Terror would help you out a little.

I have three questions ON TOPIC for you:

1) Which post are you replying to??

2) What are you talking about??

3) Did you read the OP??

Originally posted by hoochymama
reply to post by neo96

 

So, Obama got his because of Bushes actions?? LOL....exactly. Just like the Economy. The connection is down right a "Conspiracy".

Please inform me what did Obama do to get his nobel peace prize?

Haven't seen anything to warrant such a prestigious award.

The problem is that Obamas wasnt on Onion. Real Life winning. Now doesnt that give you some comfort?? Obama, who is backing a bill that will take out Whistle Blowers and make Journalist think twice about there sources??

I bet Romney would "agree" with him on this one. The agreements in the last 12 yrs of Debates is sickening. I need some actual DEBATE not a Love Fest.

Shows the true Colors of these fools.

Originally posted by hoochymama
Is there a real difference between Bush Doctrine and Obama/Clinton Doctrine?? Do you now see the problem here??

The set up is right in front of you so called smart people of ATS...Clinton '16 Trust me on this one.

Frankly, I would have voted for Clinton this election over Romney and felt it was the better of the two by a fair margin. The country did pretty damn well under her Husband and the record of those years reads that she was informed if not involved in a very proactive way for a First Lady. Given THESE two losers to chose between, I think she'd be much better over all.

Even foreign policy.... When the shots after the Ambassador came out I saw a look on Obama that looked cool and practiced. A politician who had a set back. In HER it looked like someone reached into her and tore out a piece of her heart when that guy died. I don't know what the heck the back story is on this event, but I see the last thing in place now that she had been missing to be a leader. Hate and experience of hard loss.

Hell, I'd vote for her now over either of them if any legal way existed to put her in this late. Of course, it doesn't.... So we have dumb and dumber with War plans held and run by both. I'm voting Romney only because I think his business experience gives America a SLIGHTLY better chance of not totally collapsing like Hungary or Zimbabwe when the bill arrives and it's time to pay the piper likely sometime early next year.

Even so...the odds are only slightly better, IMO. (shrug)

reply to post by hoochymama

The problem is that Obamas wasnt on Onion. Real Life winning. Now doesnt that give you some comfort?? Obama, who is backing a bill that will take out Whistle Blowers and make Journalist think twice about there sources??

He might have well been on The Onion...what did he do to win?

I bet Romney would "agree" with him on this one. The agreements in the last 12 yrs of Debates is sickening. I need some actual DEBATE not a Love Fest.

Was the last one a love fest (the one where Romney bitch slapped Obama on every issue) and not a real debate? Why was the left claiming ‘Romney cheated’ then?

Remember? He brought a cheat sheet (Hanky).

Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by Xtrozero

 

Obama inherited a sinking economy chewed up by your greedy banking system and has been held to randsome by them ever since. It was Bush that allowed the banks to go on letting banks over leverage themselves and keep lending to the toxic. Obama has spent the money trying to save America and if he hadn't you would have seen a double dip recession like tthe UK did with their right wing spending cuts and tax cuts for the rich. Because that is essentiaslly what Romney voters want right?

didnt bush/mccain try to do something about the banking mess? trying to pass reforms for the CRA? (thats the community reinvestment act for those who dont know, you know, the thing that likely caused a lot of this mess). www.govtrack.us...

i dont see any democrats on there. all republicans.

so yes, obama inherited a sinking economy that was probably caused by democrat/liberal policies that bush/republicans tried to correct but couldnt in a democrat controlled environment. you were partially correct i suppose.

keep your head in that koolaid bowl though. it was clearly all bushs fault, and making money is evil. especially if you keep some of that money in an evil offshore account ohhhh scary, my already taxed money is going to go sit in a safer account in another country.

and if you want to talk about trickling that doesnt work, trickle up is at the top of that list. especially when combined with some wealth redistribution.

this country needs people like romney who have actual experience and who have been held accountable for something in their lives. and if you think all of romneys business deals were automatically bad because hes a republican, then just take a look at the sliver of info we know about obama and the inexplicable life he has led and the amazing success he has seen with ZERO signs of why or how. talk about shady.

reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Wow. The US was more ready for a Black President (planned) than a Women President. There is plenty to be worried about Hillary being President just like we should of worried when Clinton was President. The Economy was good yes, for a reason. But the War's were still going on under your Clinton loving ways.

Looks like the Republicans set the Demo's perfectly by having Obama inherent a screwed up Economy (he knew this) but preached the same "Change" speech being brought to the other Countries looking for someone to change something. But, what is actually changing?? Nothing!!!! Nothing is changing just like if Romney is elected.

What is Romney going to do that anyone else who preaches a "Saint HOOD OF CHAINGE".... NOTHEN!!!! Either way, just look for our first Female President in '16. This Election is like Obama vs Mcain Reagan vs Mondale...it doesn't really matter.

reply to post by pngxp
So Obama making more of a Mockery of the Constitution equates to Bush creating our Economy Problems?? Yess....you are actually right. They both go hand and hand.

Maybe, just maybe, Bush and Obama are more connected than you think. I guess arguing Democrat vs Republican will make you feel better in some way, but this had been going on for a while now.

reply to post by seabag
Exactly. Obama won a Nobel Peace prize off the back of Bush. How Ironic is That!!!!

Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by campanionator

 

Yet the GOP and conservative America say he is weak on terrorism and foreign policy.and this is exactly another case where y'all are completely full of sh!t

Well, you become a weak POTUS on foreign policy and terrorism when you begin your presidency
apologizing to the world for the actions of the US, when you tell the world how great Islam is while Islamists continue to kill innocent people across the globe, and when you say America should give terrorists constitutional protection and a day in US court, etc.

If you are a bigot and inclined to think all muslims are bad, I suppose you can assign all the
acts violence to the entire group of people.

The reason you give everyone constitutional protection is so you keep the government from
apply the same tenet to American's which is already the trend. I guess you were comatose
when this mode of government ballooned, all in the name of terrorism, it appears not much
has changed on your end.

You have mastered the art of double think

You damn it and promote it in the same evening like you will in your response to me.

I don’t know….should we? I’d just as soon put a friggen’ bullet in their head. I’m in favor of waterboarding….is Obama?

No he would rather blow them up from afar so busters like you can keep your legs, arms
and lives.

Based on what; your lack of understanding of the issues?

All I understand is that conservatives harp about big government and then desire to give
government the legal right to make people disappear or to suspend their constitutional rights.
Of course you would have to be a little smarter than a toaster to realize that this type of
government can quickly apply the same standards to anyone.

Come back with a substantive rebuttal…

Done,

Come back when you take off your victoria's secret negligee and put your big boy pants on

Well I'm just a bitter ole white girl clinging to my guns and religion, but after the last four years...I am going with new guy rather than the guy I know for a fact stinks to high heaven.

reply to post by neo96
Exactly. The Partys arent like you want them to seem. The Nobel Peace Prize should of given to Bush?? LOL.

reply to post by timetothink
Did you forget about the previous 8 years because the last 4 years?? Whats the difference?? The last 4 have been worse, but worse compared to what?? The late 70's and early 80's had inflation at 14%. Can you imagine with what we have going on right now inflation at that level?? Your talking $8.00+ dollars per gallon at least!!!! But THANK GOD FOR REAGAN to rescue us!!!! LOL.....

Originally posted by hoochymama
reply to post by neo96

 

Exactly. The Partys arent like you want them to seem. The Nobel Peace Prize should of given to Bush?? LOL.

They should not be given to American presidents period, same reasoning that there will never be a pope from the US.

reply to post by TehSlenderMan


Clinton left office with a surplus.

Bush destroyed that surplus.

Bush destroyed the economy.

Bush started Afghanistan and Iraq.

How much more do you want to blame on Obama when he's still struggling with the mess that Shrub created?

And you people want to vote for Romney? What the hell is wrong with you?

reply to post by neo96
The Nobel Peace Prize shouldn't be that big of deal in the first place. Its a Fake thing anyway.

reply to post by hoochymama


I remember the previous 8 years very well...I still had some money in pocket then.

Now...things are worse.

Income is down, taxes are up...from my personal perspective. That is my life, which the current president has decided he can end at any time without due process.

So yes, I remember well. He's got to go.

reply to post by VaterOrlaag
Carter did much worse than Bush but I guess if your History Class only teaches from '2001-2012' it would make sense to you.

reply to post by VaterOrlaag


So I guess you are in 9/11 truther camp them....because you seem to forget about the terrorist attack on our soil that killed 3000 people and brought us to war...all of which could have been stopped by Clinton because he knew they were coming for us.

reply to post by timetothink
So, is Money in your pocket the key or Wars in other Countries?? So, who created the Money in your Pocket?? Bush Sr. or Clinton?? The same logic is being used for Obama's Economy is that Bush Created it. Could the same logic be given to Bush Sr. for Clinton's Economy??