US Presidential Candidate says , Israel Did 9 - 11 , Zionists Control US Politics.

Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by synapsis

 

It wasn't just the Mossad (Isreali "art students") involved. There had to be collusion with the CIA, and the FBI who refused to investigate the hijackers patsies, some of whom were housed at appartments rented to them by FBI agents. The Saudi hijacker patsies were basically escorted into the country, trained, housed and followed, all the way to the "Big Wedding" which coincided with the War Games operations which served as a smokescreen to ensure the success of the black-op psyop.

All I'm sure captured in blogs where people misrepresent information as facts and end up getting repeated again and again on here until they are accepted as facts rather than opinions people have spun?

If you would like to post your links to this, feel free, but they will all be as unsubstantiated as the regular youtube crap that appears on ATS.

Click here for more information.

Anyone pointed out yet that Merlin Miller is a white supremacist?

Originally posted by haven123
what do you expect from a iranian tv interview

Are you one of those Sock Puppets, a Government Propaganda Asset or just dumber than a box of rock which is why your avatar is a cartoon character because that's character is your role model?

Whatever the case, Mossad planted the explosives in the Twin Towers and Building 7 and this gentleman has told it like it is, including how Zionists are in control of US Politics.

Now, go stand on the side of the street with them, your day is coming.

Originally posted by DelMarvel
Anyone pointed out yet that Merlin Miller is a white supremacist?

B S and had you actually listened to his interview you would know saying so is only going to be believed by ignorant dregs like you.

He is not a White Supremest, is is a true American and you...your like the fleas on a dog.

reply to post by FlyersFan


Man, the "RADICAL MUSLIMS" 'did it all, it's their fault' thinking is quite sad when you are missing the bigger picture. You know that the Bush family did have close ties with Osama Bin Ladens family before 9/11 through his former oil company and funding. Now it's all about Al-Qaeda, they are the bad guys right? When it was the CIA which created, funded and trained them to fight the Soviet's in Afghanistan, in the first place. Those are facts.

Do you really think that the US government have lost connections with them before 9/11 until today? Guess what. 95% of the so called 'freedom fighters' fighting against the government in Syria (same which fought in Lybia) aren't even Syrians. They are mostly consisting of payed mercenaries and are tied or in terrorist organizations like the Al-Qaeda. And the US (and it's allies in the region) funds, sends weapons and gives intelligence to them... It's a fact as well. It was even said in one talk show on Fox News (if I remember correctly and to my surprise..), that the US is funding Al-Qaeda fighters in Syria to fight it's regime. I can even provide links to that, if I find it. The US is breaking international law. It's a crime to fund terrorists/mercenaries to overthrow a government. The US is doing that to cut of Iran from it's close tied neighbor. Well I'm not surprised... Iraq, Afghanistan.

Originally posted by MajorKarma

Originally posted by DelMarvel
Anyone pointed out yet that Merlin Miller is a white supremacist?

B S and had you actually listened to his interview you would know saying so is only going to be believed by ignorant dregs like you.

He is not a White Supremest, is is a true American and you...your like the fleas on a dog.

2012 presidential election In January 2012, the American Third Position Party announced Merlin Miller as its presidential nominee for the 2012 presidential election. Virginia Abernethy was announced as his running mate. [29]

Originally posted by something wicked

Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by synapsis

 

It wasn't just the Mossad (Isreali "art students") involved. There had to be collusion with the CIA, and the FBI who refused to investigate the hijackers patsies, some of whom were housed at appartments rented to them by FBI agents. The Saudi hijacker patsies were basically escorted into the country, trained, housed and followed, all the way to the "Big Wedding" which coincided with the War Games operations which served as a smokescreen to ensure the success of the black-op psyop.

All I'm sure captured in blogs where people misrepresent information as facts and end up getting repeated again and again on here until they are accepted as facts rather than opinions people have spun?

If you would like to post your links to this, feel free, but they will all be as unsubstantiated as the regular youtube crap that appears on ATS.

Much of the info can be found here

www.historycommons.org...

Edit to add: There was no official INVESTIGATION (just the Philip Zelikow authored "narrative"), so the pieces of info put together and assembled by independant researchers are largely the only remaining historical record of events and reports surrounding 9/11.

Future generations, looking back, will surely be grateful for that effort, so that something of value might be learned from it.

Originally posted by DelMarvel
Anyone pointed out yet that Merlin Miller is a white supremacist?

I posted it on the previous page. they don't care, and they won't believe it. He's saying something they want to hear so they don't care.

Originally posted by antonia
Oh lord, people throw their weight behind someone and don't even bother to check it out. This Miller is running with the American Third Position party.
en.wikipedia.org...
They are a known White Power group Good luck with that non-white folks.

“The American Third Position exists to represent the political interests of White Americans.”
- American Third Position website

american3rdposition.com...
american3rdposition.com...

Welcome to Baby Stormfront.

Originally posted by NewAgeMan

Originally posted by something wicked

Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by synapsis

 

It wasn't just the Mossad (Isreali "art students") involved. There had to be collusion with the CIA, and the FBI who refused to investigate the hijackers patsies, some of whom were housed at appartments rented to them by FBI agents. The Saudi hijacker patsies were basically escorted into the country, trained, housed and followed, all the way to the "Big Wedding" which coincided with the War Games operations which served as a smokescreen to ensure the success of the black-op psyop.

All I'm sure captured in blogs where people misrepresent information as facts and end up getting repeated again and again on here until they are accepted as facts rather than opinions people have spun?

If you would like to post your links to this, feel free, but they will all be as unsubstantiated as the regular youtube crap that appears on ATS.

Much of the info can be found here

www.historycommons.org...

Edit to add: There was no official INVESTIGATION, so the pieces of info put together and assembled by independant researchers are largely the only remaining historical record of events and reports surrounding 9/11.

Future generations looking back will be grateful for that effort, so that something of value might be learned from it.

edit on 4-10-2012 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)

I repeat my point. The link you provided is selling its opinion.

Originally posted by something wicked

Originally posted by NewAgeMan

Originally posted by something wicked

Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by synapsis

 

It wasn't just the Mossad (Isreali "art students") involved. There had to be collusion with the CIA, and the FBI who refused to investigate the hijackers patsies, some of whom were housed at appartments rented to them by FBI agents. The Saudi hijacker patsies were basically escorted into the country, trained, housed and followed, all the way to the "Big Wedding" which coincided with the War Games operations which served as a smokescreen to ensure the success of the black-op psyop.

All I'm sure captured in blogs where people misrepresent information as facts and end up getting repeated again and again on here until they are accepted as facts rather than opinions people have spun?

If you would like to post your links to this, feel free, but they will all be as unsubstantiated as the regular youtube crap that appears on ATS.

Much of the info can be found here

www.historycommons.org...

Edit to add: There was no official INVESTIGATION, so the pieces of info put together and assembled by independant researchers are largely the only remaining historical record of events and reports surrounding 9/11.

Future generations looking back will be grateful for that effort, so that something of value might be learned from it.

edit on 4-10-2012 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)

I repeat my point. The link you provided is selling its opinion.

Um..you'd have to actually spend some time in there reviewing the info before making that assessment. Everything in there is well sourced and factual. Go take a look before ASSUMING why don't you?

Originally posted by NewAgeMan

Originally posted by something wicked

Originally posted by NewAgeMan

Originally posted by something wicked

Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by synapsis

 

It wasn't just the Mossad (Isreali "art students") involved. There had to be collusion with the CIA, and the FBI who refused to investigate the hijackers patsies, some of whom were housed at appartments rented to them by FBI agents. The Saudi hijacker patsies were basically escorted into the country, trained, housed and followed, all the way to the "Big Wedding" which coincided with the War Games operations which served as a smokescreen to ensure the success of the black-op psyop.

All I'm sure captured in blogs where people misrepresent information as facts and end up getting repeated again and again on here until they are accepted as facts rather than opinions people have spun?

If you would like to post your links to this, feel free, but they will all be as unsubstantiated as the regular youtube crap that appears on ATS.

Much of the info can be found here

www.historycommons.org...

Edit to add: There was no official INVESTIGATION, so the pieces of info put together and assembled by independant researchers are largely the only remaining historical record of events and reports surrounding 9/11.

Future generations looking back will be grateful for that effort, so that something of value might be learned from it.

edit on 4-10-2012 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)

I repeat my point. The link you provided is selling its opinion.

Um..you'd have to actually spend some time in there reviewing the info before making that assessment. Everything in there is well sourced and factual. Go take a look before ASSUMING why don't you?

Yes, it was really easy. It takes facts but uses them to join dots to make an ASSUMPTION and define that assumption as a fact - does that help?

Originally posted by DelMarvel
Anyone pointed out yet that Merlin Miller is a white supremacist?

I didn't see a swastika tattooed on his forehead, but you know what, even if that were true he'd still be a better candidate than Obama or Romney. But instead Merlin Miller is a graduate of West Point and was an engineer for Michelin tire, so where you get white supremacist from this background is kind of odd, probably just a desperate smear to distract what he has to say. The old ad hominem attack never fails, right? P.s. Nice one liner, try argument and logic next time not useless racist cards.

Originally posted by filosophia


I didn't see a swastika tattooed on his forehead,.

Right. Because all white supremacists have swastikas tattooed on their foreheads.

Here, take a look at this article by Miller in the Occidental Observer. Check out the comments section and tell me this guy isn't part of the white supremacist community.

www.theoccidentalobserver.net...

reply to post by something wicked

Ah.. that's not actually the way the info is presented, but you couldn't know that without actually reviewing the articles there to see how they're sourced and put together.

OTOH, there's the 9/11 Commission Report, which is as far as I know, the only "official" "historical" record of the event which in the words of Zelikow himself is more of a "narrative" or a story than an actual historical accounting of events and on that note, you might be well served to research Zelikow's biography and his writings pre-9/11 to understand why he was charged with creating the official "narrative" for 9/11.. you might be rather taken aback..

Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by something wicked

 

Ah.. that's not actually the way the info is presented, but you couldn't know that without actually reviewing the articles there to see how they're sourced and put together.

OTOH, there's the 9/11 Commission Report, which is as far as I know, the only "official" "historical" record of the event which in the words of Zelikow himself is more of a "narrative" or a story than an actual historical accounting of events and on that note, you might be well served to research Zelikow's biography and his writings pre-9/11 to understand why he was charged with creating the official "narrative" for 9/11.. you might be rather taken aback..

Hi, no, not really, why would I be taken aback? You have various people with various theories, but no hardline facts, but lots of opinions. Cue the flames........

Hmmm, a real man speaks his mind without bias unto himself or others.
A very rare specimen. He has my vote. I would like to work with him and I'm sure you would as well though he may want to visit a hairstylist as his bangs were a bit distracting. This could be important for many folks vote on appearance rather than the content of the message which often goes 'unnoticed'.

Originally posted by something wicked

Originally posted by NewAgeMan
OTOH, there's the 9/11 Commission Report, which is as far as I know, the only "official" "historical" record of the event which in the words of Zelikow himself is more of a "narrative" or a story than an actual historical accounting of events and on that note, you might be well served to research Zelikow's biography and his writings pre-9/11 to understand why he was charged with creating the official "narrative" for 9/11.. you might be rather taken aback..

Hi, no, not really, why would I be taken aback?

Catastrophic Terrorism:

Elements of a National Policy

by Philip D. Zelikow, December 1998

www.hks.harvard.edu...

guy must be a prophet, or...?


You may note how his language found it's way into this report

Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century
A Report of the Project for the New American Century
September 2000

www.newamericancentury.org...

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."


On September 11, 2001, George W. Bush wrote in his journal: "The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today." He was echoing the summary of a September, 2000 report titled "Rebuilding America's Defenses" published by a neoconservative think tank called the Project for a New American Century (PNAC).

Zelikow

The idea of 'public presumption'," he explained, "is akin to [the] notion of 'public myth' but without the negative implication sometimes invoked by the word 'myth.'

Such presumptions are beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community."

So Zelikow, the guy who wrote The 9/11 Commission Report, was an expert in how to misuse public trust and create PUBLIC MYTHS.

If 9/11 was nothing but a huge HOAX, you would naturally expect that the event itself would have to be perfectly scripted.

In 1998, Zelikow actually wrote Catastrophic Terrorism about imagining "the transformative event" three years before 9/11.

Here are Zelikow's 1998 words. Readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on current policy is lack of imagination.

An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America's history.

It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans' fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse.

Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible.

Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a "before" and "after."

The effort and resources we devote to averting or containing this threat now, in the "before" period, will seem woeful, even pathetic, when compared to what will happen "after."

Philip D. Zelikow

www.ksg.harvard.edu...

"... if the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center had succeeded, the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed even in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security..Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with.."

~ Philip Zelikow, pre-9/11

While at Harvard he worked with Ernest May and Richard Neustadt on the use, and misuse, of history in policymaking. They observed, as Zelikow noted in his own words, that "contemporary" history is "defined functionally by those critical people and events that go into forming the public's presumptions about its immediate past. The idea of 'public presumption'," he explained, "is akin to William McNeill's notion of 'public myth' but without the negative implication sometimes invoked by the word 'myth.' Such presumptions are beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community."

Zelikow's focus was on what he calls 'searing' or 'moulding' events [that] take on 'transcendental' importance and, therefore, retain their power even as the experience generation passes from the scene."

In Rise of the Vulcans (Viking, 2004), James Mann reports that when Richard Haass, a senior aide to Secretary of State Colin Powell and the director of policy planning at the State Department, drafted for the administration an overview of America’s national security strategy following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Dr. Rice, the national security advisor, "ordered that the document be completely rewritten. She thought the Bush administration needed something bolder, something that would represent a more dramatic break with the ideas of the past. Rice turned the writing over to her old colleague, University of Virginia Professor Philip Zelikow." This document, issued on September 17, 2002, is generally recognized as a significant document in the War on Terrorism.

en.wikipedia.org...

The Family Steering Committee for the 9-11 Commission repeatedly called for Philip Zelikow’s resignation. The families, citing Zelikow’s close connections to the Bush Administration, were concerned that Zelikow’s appointment made a mockery of the idea that the Commission was “independent.” But the Zionist controlled Bush Administration ignored their complaint.

Zelikow's Conflicts of Interest

1989-91: Zelikow works closely with Condoleezza Rice as part of the National Security Council during George Bush Sr’s Administration.

1995: Zelikow & Rice write a book together.

1996-98: Zelikow & Rice are together again when Zelikow is Director of the Aspen Strategy Group, a Zionist foreign-policy strategy “think tank.” Rice, along with Dick Cheney & Paul Wolfowitz, are also members.

2000: Zelikow & Rice are reunited when Bush names Zelikow to his transition team for the National Security Council.

2000: Zelikow is briefed by former White House terrorism czar Richard Clarke about the growing al-Qaida threat.

2001: Zelikow is appointed by Bush to the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.

2003: Zelikow is appointed Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission. Thus it is no different than if Rice or Cheney had been running the Commission.

2004: Zelikow skews the investigation by deciding which topics would be investigated and which ones not. Bush’s comic book line for the motive behind 9/11 is taken by Zelikow: “Al Qaida hates our freedom.”

2004: Zelikow is secretly in contact with President Bush’s close adviser Karl Rove while the “independent” Commission is completing its report finalized on July 22 2004.

Whitewash

• exonerate by means of a perfunctory investigation or through biased presentation of data
  
• cover up a misdemeanor, fault, or error; "Let's not whitewash the crimes of Stalin"; "She tried to gloss over her mistakes"
  

interesting interview. It's like a Ron Paul who's not afraid to speak out against the I$rael-First mentality in Washington

"Israel Did 9-11 , Zionists Control US Politics"

You mean there are still people walking around that don't know this

Wow. Wake up America!

No hate on the OP'er, actually quite the oppisite, enlighten the sheep! I just can't believe this isn't common knowledge nowdays.