It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by randyvs
A "common ancestor " for which there is no proof what so ever anywhere.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by rhinoceros
Even science will some day prove beyond all doubt there must be a Creator. It's the only logical way.
Sorry, but ever since the rise of molecular genetics, it has been proven beyond any doubt that all life of Earth (that we have studied) shares a common ancestor.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by rhinoceros
I think you're wrong
Even science will some day prove beyond all doubt there must be a Creator. It's the only logical way.edit on 3-10-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Murgatroid
Of course they do... that common ancestor would be God.
Except for the vast nucleotide databases among other things..
God was an unicellular organism that lived some 3.8 billion years ago? You learn something new every day
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by DeadSeraph
Because reconciliation is unacceptable Saraph to God and there for to me and you better get you're head in the game man. Cause I pray you it will matter." Have No other gods before me ".edit on 3-10-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Rhino
God was an unicellular organism that lived some 3.8 billion years ago? You learn something new every day
Now you learn something. God was, is and will be ! You keep on accepting half truths and lies.
Must be your lifestyle that makes you so willingly ignorant.
Saraph
I suggest you do some soul searching amigo and figure out where your at in all of this cause you can't be luke warm.edit on 3-10-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by rhinoceros
Except for the vast nucleotide databases among other things..
Like all the tons of information placed in the genome that keeps each kind to it's own unless manipulated by mans incessant tinkering. Trying to be God. That what all this is about friend. Man trying to be God..
I'm not lukewarm at all. I am 100% convinced of God's existence, of the existence of Jesus Christ, his death and resurrection, etc. I'm just not convinced that the account given in genesis of the creation should be interpreted to mean the world was literally created in 6 human days, 6000 years ago.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by DeadSeraph
I'm not lukewarm at all. I am 100% convinced of God's existence, of the existence of Jesus Christ, his death and resurrection, etc. I'm just not convinced that the account given in genesis of the creation should be interpreted to mean the world was literally created in 6 human days, 6000 years ago.
Well does Gods word even say such a thing. I don't believe it even does. But people look to this Big Bang theory to take the place of God and that's what you were referring too. So I'll stop short of any accusations against you other than that cause I like you to Saraph. Now gimme a kiss.edit on 3-10-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
There are many Christians out there that believe in the big bang. It doesn't replace God for them, however. They just think God initiated it. It was how He brought this universe into being.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
There are many Christians out there that believe in the big bang. It doesn't replace God for them, however. They just think God initiated it. It was how He brought this universe into being.
And then 65 million years ago the hand of God pushed a big rock towards our planet setting up the sequence of events that would bring about mankind? If we were the end game, then why the hell bother with the hole dinosaur thing to begin with?edit on 3-10-2012 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by RebelPanda
I think it is wrong to teach theories that are not proven and un testable
See that's the whole point regardless of who thinks what. It's stupid to teach something that isn't fact and changes from day to day in my view.
I think Hovind makes some great points in that regard and you people can say what you want and that's that. I don't give a crap who likes it. I'm not here for anyone to like. Now how about that?
See the vid is old. No one can possibly think I didn''t take that into consideration. Sorry I think evolution is just another religion being taught in place of one that has far more clout and used a week vid to show that.
But most of you should know these things about me. I don't always play to be the most popular or well liked.
PHFFF !edit on 3-10-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
That seems somewhat short sighted, don't you think? How do you know what God's plans were? The decayed matter of those periods turned into what we use for fuel today, did it not?
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
And what about the rest of the universe? 13 billion years is a long time. Why did it need to take so long to get here? Do we know what the rest of the universe holds?
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
There are billions and billions of Galaxy's out there with billions and billions of stars each. Do you suppose that you know what the purpose of each is, or even what secrets lie within them? We don't even know for sure if the big bang was exactly how the universe was born, or if there is a multiverse. You seem overly confident in what amounts to very limited understanding, to me.