It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Running for Bush's third term, Romney surrounds himself with Bush aides.
Mitt Romney could well become the most dangerous man in the world if he is elected to be the US President. The Wall Street Journal... “Mitt Romney is relying on both moderate and hawkish neoconservative advisers …” many of these advisers were Bush operatives.
Some of the names from Romney’s list are as follows…
- Henry Kissinger (Nixon’s Secretary of State)
- James Baker (George H.W. Bush’s Secretary of State)
- Cofer Black (former CIA official, former vice president of Blackwater International)
- Eliot Cohen (George W. Bush’s State Department official)
- Paula Dobriansky (George W. Bush’s State Department official)
- Norm Coleman
- John Bolton (George W. Bush’s former UN ambassador)
- John Lehman (Reagan’s Secretary of the Navy)
- George Shultz (Reagan’s Secretary of State)
- Richard Williamson (George W. Bush’s Assistant Secretary of State)
- Michael Chertoff (Bush’s Homeland Security Secretary)
- Michael Hayden (created warrantless wiretapping programs for Bush)
Originally posted by buster2010
Even the Nazis learned that torture was useless. Sad to see the GOP picked someone that refuses to learn from the past.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Que the "but Obama is WORSE" and "torture isnt really THAT bad" posts in 3...2...1...
but I digress. This comes as no shock. The GOP is very pro "war on terror", even if it means becoming terrorists themselves.
The GOP is very pro "war on terror", even if it means becoming terrorists themselves.
Originally posted by CB328
The GOP is very pro "war on terror", even if it means becoming terrorists themselves.
Excellent post, I might have to start quoting that line.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by RealSpoke
Using more extreme torture methods devalues the reputation of the country using them. It also sends the message that the means justifies the ends and that anything goes.
Originally posted by votan
even if Obama isn't lieing... its not like obama has direct control of everything our military and intelligence agencies do. HOw much is not kept from him like it is from our representatives under the guise of national security.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Torture does not work
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Torture does not work
How do you know?
I bet even you can think of one instance where torture would be acceptable.
Say you have a time machine and go back to the day before the USA was nuked by 500 nukes at the same time in 500 major US cities. Lets say you found the guy who just delivered these launch codes to the main nuke controller but he's not talking. You just let him walk? See you in the next life.. or do you torture him to get the info and save your country?.
Originally posted by PvtHudson
...zombies...
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by RealSpoke
Please, please, please America. I've said it on other threads and I will repeat it here. Please don't let Romney win. That man is slimy filth, he's pondlife. Whatever you're gonna tick or write on the ballot, DO NOT tick Mitt Romney. Do the world a favour.
Originally posted by loam
Oh, this thread is too rich...
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Isn't this interesting? Obama signed this EO to stop torture as one of his first actions in office.
A pretty meaningless accomplishment, when you can simply assume the intelligence you might suspect and just KILL the person, including American citizens without judicial due process:
Obama's Kill List
...or presume their guilt by virtue of their geographic proximity to other presumed terrorists:
U.S. Drone Policy: Standing Near Terrorists Makes You A Terrorist
Obama, Becker and Shane write, was angry when informed that the first drone strike after he took office had killed innocent Pakistanis. But one of the measures the administration embraced to prevent future innocent casualties was to embrace a method of counting combatants that would rope in more innocents.
"It in effect counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants, according to several administration officials, unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent," the Times reports. "Counterterrorism officials insist this approach is one of simple logic: people in an area of known terrorist activity, or found with a top Qaeda operative, are probably up to no good."
...or detain a person indefinitely without due process:
Obama wins right to indefinitely detain Americans under NDAA
...or just convince most people you've eliminated torture, by removing one type of it (water-boarding), while still heavily engaging in other types of it:
Torture under Obama
and:
ACLU trashes Obama over indefinite detention and torture act
****************
Yeah, I'm real glad Obama offers an alternative to the approaches outlined by these mere advisers to Romney (he hasn't actually said this would be his position yet).
Just think how much worse off we would be...
edit on 29-9-2012 by loam because: (no reason given)