It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by supermouse
For our foreign readers who may not know, British benefits are insanely high. $100,000 a year for a family is not unusual.
Originally posted by jude11
reply to post by CthulhuMythos
Sure, they're glad to take money from the poor to fund entertainment for the rich. And now that they're done, it's time to cut them off completely.
People are going to stand and deliver if this happens and it won't be pretty.
Peace
Originally posted by pikestaff
reply to post by CthulhuMythos
you can blame Mrs Thacher for that, she decided the UK should be a service industry nation, (banking, tourism)
a really stupid woman at times, and her 'advisers'
Originally posted by souljacker
reply to post by supermouse
Can you PROVE any of that because from what I see its complete nonsense!edit on 24-9-2012 by souljacker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by supermouse
Originally posted by jude11
So what many said would never happen may already be in the works. Not just reducing benefits but actually freezing them? How is this possible?
This post makes no sense. They are not talking about reducing benefits, not are they freezing them. Instead they have suggested increasing them in line with working peoples' wages.
For our foreign readers who may not know, British benefits are insanely high. $100,000 a year for a family is not unusual. Benefits scroungers are destroying the economy, not just because of the money they take, but because they can outbid working people for food, housing etc. Working people spend three or more hours a day travelling into London to get to work, while the City centre is full of unemployed people living in luxury. As this post verifies, the lazy, greedy ingrates want even more!
Any family where the father or mother deigns to work a few hours a week is instantly catupulted into the top 20% of incomes because of tax credits and housing benefits. Jobs are disappearing because employers can't compete with the generosity of the handouts.
The government preaches austerity, but keeps increasing spending and taxes. "We're all in it together", but the public sector haven't decreased spending by even a penny, while the tax rates on the productive go up and up (over 70% of income at some levels). MPs expenses have returned to record levels.
The old people are the worst, being given massive pensions they haven't saved a penny for, plus free transport and free houses to leave to their kids.
Opportunities are being destroyed, no matter how hard you work you can't escape from mediocrity because most of your money is taken to support idle lay-abouts (pensioners and rich landlords as well as unemployed scroungers).
It's shocking that any reasonable person doesn't want to cut the hand-outs. Do they want our children to be suffocated by debt?
Originally posted by lifeform11
reply to post by supermouse
you obviously have never had the period of fortune of being unemployed, I recommend you try it, it is like living in luxury.
seriously, getting 100,000 dollars a year is very very rare. and tax credits are handed out regardless of if your unemployed. working tax credits you can only get if your WORKING, and child tax credits you can only get if you have a CHILD or two, they have nothing to do with being unemployed. anybody can make a claim for tax credits, the lower your income the more your entitled to.
I think you are basing this on the most that is possible to get rather than what the average person/family actually gets.edit on 24-9-2012 by lifeform11 because: typo
Originally posted by lambros56
Hold ona sec.......
What planet are you from ?
£100,000 benefits ?
Me and my wife get less than Ten thousand.
The pensioners get Nothing.
Have i read your post wrong?
Originally posted by elouina
Welfare is not a right, it is an entitlement where as you are given another persons money.
Whether today's global overcapacity is seen as cause or effect of the economic crisis, one thing is certain: it isn't easy to make a profit in a world awash with overproduction. Capitalism is born in conditions of scarcity and is unable to function outside of them. So it seems logical that the crisis creates a tendency to restore these conditions artificially. But how does this affect the chances of the global economy to find a way out of its present predicament?
Technological capacity to produce enough to satisfy everyone's needs already exists globally and has done so for many decades. Yet needs continue to remain unmet on a massive scale. Why? Quite simply because scarcity is a functional requirement of capitalism itself.
As for WORKING being the only way of getting tax credits, you obviously haven't heard of the people getting tens of thousands in working tax credits by pretending to sell the big issue for a few hours each week. You don't have to really go to work or anything.
Naive people think, oh yeah, it's great to help the poor, but the reality is that people on benefits are often better off than the people who work all hours to pay for them.
Originally posted by ANOK
What do you think would happen if welfare was taken away now? What about people who can't work?
Originally posted by elouina
Originally posted by souljacker
A couple of years back I had a younger girlfriend. I'm NOT financially stable by any means but all she could think of was us having a baby so SHE got a FREE flat and could escape living with her parents