It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's not enough that you help the poor only once!! It must be a life long commitment of austerity so you can help the needy as much as possible!!
Then why are you wasting your time on the internet instead of helping the needy? There's soup kitchens you could be running, homeless shelters, volunteer work, etc., yet here you are accusing others of hypocrisy.
It's not enough that you help the poor only once!! It must be a life long commitment of austerity so you can help the needy as much as possible!!
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Then why are you wasting your time on the internet instead of helping the needy? There's soup kitchens you could be running, homeless shelters, volunteer work, etc., yet here you are accusing others of hypocrisy.
If he isn't already doing something of that sort, then you know what that makes him.
But, just what are you doing with a computer and an internet connection, when you should be doing as Jesus taught
"Sell your possessions and give to the poor. "
Nothing wrong with having prosperity if you use it to glorify God, he blesses us so we can bless others so they can see his love and light in us and so bring others to him.
Originally posted by TDawgRex
What's your point?
Mans inhumanity to man?
Yea...we get that already.
With true Faith in Christ, you can be broke, homeless, crippled, and/or imprisoned and tortured, yet still smile and be at peace. Tell me that's not following God....
It's quite simple really. If every servant of Christ on earth were to live a life of poverty - many many demographics and contexts would remain untouched by a witness. Many richer neighborhoods, schools, universities, many professions, many avenues would not be traveled by Christians as we would be sequestered in an impoverished lifestyle. We can't all be nomadic like Christ was and we can't all be hermetic like John was - how are we to be the light of the WORLD with such a narrow window to minister? We're talking a very limited target audience here, if we're all to be poor.
Peace to you. your message makes sense but you deliver it in a non Christian way. Claiming to do what is better than others is pride, which is the greatest fault. You should be the first to judge yourself, not others. Look not at the outside, but what's on the inside, because only God knows the state of hearts. Look at the situation realistically because this thread may turn many away from God. Pray for those Christians who are not doing what they should but do not exact the world from them. Do not blame them for world hunger, nor all wars. Because with the way the world is everyone has been conditioned to believe in materialism, do you not think that God sees those who have been condition into false beliefs, and pities and forgives them. Worry about yourself and growing in virtue rather than saying "anathema", because many will be forgiven, through your prayers and pity. peace to you again, and please receive it. Love thy neighbor and thy enemies. God is infinite mercy/
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Then why are you wasting your time on the internet instead of helping the needy? There's soup kitchens you could be running, homeless shelters, volunteer work, etc., yet here you are accusing others of hypocrisy. Take the plank out of your eye before attending to the speck of sawdust in your brothers' eye.
My point is that charity and giving to the poor is a very important teaching of the bible.
Originally posted by ahnggk
reply to post by Sinny
None taken then!
@Bullshirt
Those are certainly the worse examples of Church values I've heard. Perhaps I could say I'm even lucky for most churches I've been to are 'missionary churches' for pastors/founder themselves are missionaries who gave everything up to build the church in a foreign land.
They would literally drive cheap, old, beat up, but small cars so it's still fuel efficient, not for the show but they were doing their best to have as little to themselves but more for the poor.
But the problem was their members. No matter how hard our pastor preached, they would just laugh at what he's saying! Believing not everyone is called to do great things for God and the poor. Sad. real sad!
Many would complain, we have nothing left after paying the bills, that's a simple problem - get a cheap place to rent, sell that luxury SUV, get a cheap/used car, sell your possessions that is beyond the basic need of food and clothing and not being used for the Gospel, settle your debts, burn your credit card, eat less!! eat less!! quit your hobbies, they idols anyways, stop useless leisure/recreational activities, stop worrying about your kid's education, save on electricity and water...
It doesn't matter how much you earn, it's never your money, it's always God's!! Even if you earn million bucks per year, still drive a cheap, small, used car!! rent cheap apartment, have only few possessions...
...Less to yourself, more to others. Stop loving your life and your family in the flesh!! Love them in the Spirit!! Get out of the addiction to pleasure, luxury, enjoyment, and wealth. Love your life, you will lose it later!!
Give to the poor, give to those who had none!! Give to the poor!! Don't Stop giving!!
In a year, we who are 'blessed' with much are collectively doing a worse crime than Adolf Hitler did, both unbelievers and Christians alike...
The unbelievers for their cold hearts and love of money and Christians for their cold hearts, love of money, and disobedience to Christ!
edit on 22-9-2012 by ahnggk because: (no reason given)
Well, from the Protestant perspective, saying that people will go to hell for not doing good works is an invalid statement,
There is a semantic component to this debate as well, which has gained new attention in the past century. Both Latin and English have two words to describe convictions: one is more intellectual (English belief, Latin verb credo) and one carries implications of "faithfulness" (English faith, Latin fides). But Greek and German have only one (German Glaube, Greek pistis).
Some historians have suggested that this semantic issue caused some of the disagreement:[citation needed] perhaps Luther's supporters may have understood "salvation by faith alone" to mean "salvation by being faithful to Christ", while his opponents understood him to mean "salvation by intellectual belief in Christ". Since there are passages in Luther's works that could be taken to support either of these meanings, both sides were able to quote passages from Luther defending their interpretation of what he meant.
The position that justification is by faith alone has often been charged with promoting antinomianism, in which salvific faith need not be a type that will produce works of obedience to Christ, which is a view most who hold to sola fide reject, invoking many authorities from the past and present in concurrence.
Martin Luther, who opposed antinomianism, is recorded as stating, [color=34C217]“Works are necessary for salvation but they do not cause salvation; for faith alone gives life.”[22]
In his Introduction to Romans, [color=34C217]Luther stated that saving faith is,
a living, creative, active and powerful thing, this faith. Faith cannot help doing good works constantly. It doesn’t stop to ask if good works ought to be done, but before anyone asks, it already has done them and continues to do them without ceasing. Anyone who does not do good works in this manner is an unbeliever...Thus, it is just as impossible to separate faith and works as it is to separate heat and light from fire! [23]
Scottish theologian John Murray of Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, asserted,
[color=FA2AC3]“Faith alone justifies but a justified person with faith alone would be a monstrosity which never exists in the kingdom of grace. Faith works itself out through love (Gal. 5:6). And Faith without works is dead (James 2:17-20).”
“It is living faith that justifies and living faith unites to Christ both in the virtue of his death and in the power of his resurrection. No one has entrusted himself to Christ for deliverance from the guilt of sin who has not also entrusted himself to him for deliverance from the power of sin.”[24] [25]
Contemporary evangelical theologian R. C. Sproul writes,
The relationship of faith and good works is one that may be distinguished but never separated...if good works do not follow from our profession of faith, it is a clear indication that we do not possess justifying faith. The Reformed formula is, “We are justified by faith alone but not by a faith that is alone.”[26]
Dr. Michael Horton (theologian) concurs by saying,
[color=75FA28]This debate, therefore, is not over the question of whether God renews us and initiates a process of gradual growth in holiness throughout the course of our lives. ‘We are justified by faith alone, but not by a faith that is alone,’ Luther stated, and this recurring affirmation of the new birth and sanctification as necessarily linked to justification leads one to wonder how the caricatures continue to be perpetuated without foundation.[27]
I believe the idea is that we are not expected to be PERFECT, but to do our level best to live up to Christ's teachings, while allowing for the fact that as humans, we will, and do, make mistakes....these may be mistakes of omission or mistakes of behavior. Didn't do the right thing, OR did the wrong thing. In any case, it's always assumed we screw up.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by WhisperingWinds
Hello winds, Very glad to see we agree on that!
I hope it will clear up some of the misinformation about "Protestants." I was only brought up in one sect (Episcopal), but I certainly have always understood that most sincere Protestants do believe in extending help to others.
In fact, I think most normal, healthy PEOPLE want to help others and know compassion, which is what Jesus promoted.
Originally posted by wildtimes
I hope it will clear up some of the misinformation about "Protestants." I was only brought up in one sect (Episcopal), but I certainly have always understood that most sincere Protestants do believe in extending help to others.
Episcopalians (Anglican) being the closest thing to Roman Catholicism, but I assure you that many, if not most, Protestants would disagree with you.
Originally posted by wildtimes
I have lived more than 50 years among the general WASP population, and I assure you, that the traditional Protestant sects are very much keen on "charitable giving", and I just two days ago I patronized a Presbyterian church 'rummage sale' (love that quaint phrase! Reminds me of my mom and Grammie)....
bought a crock-pot for $2.
can you not concede that perhaps your understanding of their mindset is second-hand? Since you are not (yet) a Protestant, why do you feel it's your place to discuss "their" ("our") Protestant beliefs?