It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As you now wish to be argumentative ( by your own admission you are trying to win an argument) instead of participating in a reasonable discussion, I do not think as a Christian I can continue to fuel your angst. I am turning the other cheek, wiping the dust off my sandals and leaving the city.
Sometimes when someone is grouchy, or filled with pent up anger or frustration, it takes very little to set them off. This is why leaders of peoples have it in their best interest to create a sense of discontent or emotional upset (fear, anger). This gives an underlying momentum that is easier to canalize and stear whatever way you point it.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
The creation of these extremists and terrorists has less to do with Sharia Laws than our own activities over in the ME.
'Terrorist apologist?'
What a joke. You want to ignore every other reason for Muslim or Arab terrorism and blame it all on the Sharia laws or Koran. Just because you can't understand something doesn't mean it isn't accurate. Koranic verse and Sharia Law have been around for 1400 years and yet the anti-Western terrorists have come along in the 20th Century.
The British occupied Basra, Qatar, Palestine, Libya and Bahrain in the 20th Century. The US got involved to strengthen NATO and keep the Soviets at bay. This is before oil became the focus and we began to install puppet governments and use the region as a security zone. Although it was a UN plan to partition Palestine, the US has had the brunt of the blame. Millions of Arabs were displaced in this process and given the fact it's within living memory....some are still a bit miffed. Now if we also remember how we backed dictatorships like Saddam Hussein and various Ayatollahs, you might just begin to accept that terrorists aren't created by a few words in the Koran.
I'm against any flavour of terrorism and I'm against your argument that history and politics have no influence on the activities of societies or terrorists.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Over the weeks, I've read several of your posts and you actually share the same ideas as those you condemn in the Middle East. You just don't realise it.
You've supported pre-emptive strikes on the ME and putting all Muslims in the US into camps. Rather than see the Muslim world as a billion individuals with the same differences as any other population, you want to define them all as the extremists who riot. You want to characterise them all as pushing Sharia Law and wanting to convert the word to Islam.
Now from a Muslim extremist's point of view, he'll see all Westerners as deserving death or imprisonment. He'll believe all Christians want to destroy his religion. He'd support a pre-emptive strike on the US without batting an eye. He'd ignore the fact that people are different and hold different values. He'd ignore any historical context and wouldn't seek to inform, but would seek confirmation of his cast-in-stone belief that the West is a threat that should be destroyed.
Your views and the extremist views are two sides of the same coin.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Over the weeks, I've read several of your posts and you actually share the same ideas as those you condemn in the Middle East. You just don't realise it.
You've supported pre-emptive strikes on the ME and putting all Muslims in the US into camps. Rather than see the Muslim world as a billion individuals with the same differences as any other population, you want to define them all as the extremists who riot. You want to characterise them all as pushing Sharia Law and wanting to convert the word to Islam.
Now from a Muslim extremist's point of view, he'll see all Westerners as deserving death or imprisonment. He'll believe all Christians want to destroy his religion. He'd support a pre-emptive strike on the US without batting an eye. He'd ignore the fact that people are different and hold different values. He'd ignore any historical context and wouldn't seek to inform, but would seek confirmation of his cast-in-stone belief that the West is a threat that should be destroyed.
Your views and the extremist views are two sides of the same coin.
I certainly do not characterize all Muslims as pushers of Sharia Law and wanting to convert the world to Islam.
Originally posted by Bluesma
reply to post by AQuestion
Thank you.
I think you may be right. I suspect that there may be even more behind the tensions because there are power hungry leaders of religions and peoples everywhere. I think there is a large part of the population in the Middle East that is really victim, stuck in between the big boys battles over oil and power.
On both sides of the earth, we have a large part of the peoples being manipulated in that.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
There are already laws and agencies in place to arrest and charge potential terrorists.
Originally posted by AQuestion
Dear Bluesma,
I am in Los Angeles, so far from France that we will probably never meet and you are still cute. People like us better when we don't spend all our time killing them. How surprising. We don't kill over religion, we kill over money. Hispanics are usually Catholic, the Arab Muslims don't kill them; but, then Hispanics are not bombing Arabs, could there be a reason? could there be a connection between our killing people and their not liking us? I don't support killing and no Muslim attacks me,what am I to make of this?