It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by ThePublicEnemyNo1
Originally posted by TXRabbit
Don't you guys get it?
If I$rael or anybody else in the region didn't have nuclear weapons/programs, there wouldn't be anything to whine or complain about.
When there's nothing to whine or complain about, I$rael is no longer a victim.
When I$rael is no longer the victim, they don't get paid.
When I$rael doesn't get paid, neither do the US politicians who support them (campaign contributions, outsourcing/contractual agreements etc)
Spoken like a pro
Spoken like an anti-Israeli propagandist.
Originally posted by tangonine
The difference is that Israel has used its nuclear capability not as a threat but as a deterrent. Iran explicitly threatens the states of Israel on a weekly basis.
If you can't differentiate between the two then, well, (comment that would get me mod attention).
Logic. Try it.
You really need to remove your "rose coloured glasses" when talking about Israel.
Originally posted by dontreally
A bunch of crazed Islamists come together and essentially say to Israel "hey, come join us in our nuke-free summit. No? Yea, we know you have nukes to protect yourself from us, but still; it's no good for us!"
You really need to remove your "rose coloured glasses" when talking about Israel.