It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

US Navy Warned of Attack by Israel

page: 2
10
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 11 2012 @ 05:56 PM
link   
reply to post by ZeroKnowledge
 


Even more interesting is the fact that...


(Editor’s Note: Petitions are being organized to rename the aircraft carrier, USS Ronald Reagan the USS Rachel Corrie. The ship would remain on station in the Mediterranean near the spot the USS Liberty was attacked in 1967)


VT at it again

So which is it un-trustable VT. A carrier or an aegis...

Gotta love bad propaganda

ETA: Maybe all threads that use VT as the source should be moved to the HOAX bin? Or to one about propaganda? Maybe even the trash? Mods?
edit on 11-9-2012 by thesungod because: see eta



posted on Sep, 11 2012 @ 06:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by thesungod
reply to post by ZeroKnowledge
 


Even more interesting is the fact that...


(Editor’s Note: Petitions are being organized to rename the aircraft carrier, USS Ronald Reagan the USS Rachel Corrie. The ship would remain on station in the Mediterranean near the spot the USS Liberty was attacked in 1967)


VT at it again

So which is it un-trustable VT. A carrier or an aegis...

Gotta love bad propaganda

Oh heck... I should have known better these days but to check the US Navy's inventory before saying anything at all. I remember not too long ago when one could feel fairly confident in replying to a thread and not finding the whole basis the thread is centered around being complete fiction. I'm not suggesting the OP knew..because we can't know that and it seems rude to assume it....but Wow... Yeah.. No such ship except for some people's crazy wishful thinking. I'm keyed a bit like everyone else with looking for the wild and unexpected leading to Nov and Dec I suppose.


U.S. Navy inventory of ships

I can't believe I didn't recognize the name itself.. We'd all just been talking recently about the verdict on this woman's case.
Back to the drawing boards of fact checking the fact checking done on any OP I don't know with a history of solid threads I've personally been on. Oh why, Oh why? (sigh)



posted on Sep, 11 2012 @ 06:24 PM
link   
u.s probably let israel off again same as they did after the u.s.s liberty was attacked by israel... wonder just what it will take for the americans to clearly see the threat israel is to the world...



posted on Sep, 11 2012 @ 06:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Expat888
 


Something other than lies from VT I bet.
edit on 11-9-2012 by thesungod because: from not for



posted on Sep, 11 2012 @ 06:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I hope someday we can take a true and honest look at the U.S.S. Liberty incident and accept what did and did not actually happen there.

Id love to discuss it with you.

Too many on this site twist half truths with their own opinions on this topic.

See Sig below to prove my point.



posted on Sep, 11 2012 @ 08:47 PM
link   
reply to post by gladtobehere
 

I would have thought that" potentate" would be the word not used enough.
This is going to be interesting.



posted on Sep, 11 2012 @ 10:29 PM
link   
VT clearly know very little about AEGIS ships if they still think of them as 'state of the art' or 'cutting edge' defensive systems.....Against current missile technology the AEGIS is obsolete.

AEGIS doesn't have sufficient fire director systems to deal with the payload of even a single Tu-160 (twenty-four supersonic cruise missiles).....At best it might get a dozen of them before it is sunk.

Slightly off topic, but felt it was worth pointing out.



posted on Sep, 12 2012 @ 12:42 AM
link   
reply to post by ZeroKnowledge
 


Yep, there is no such ship named the USS Rachel Corrie.

There was a MV Rachel Corrie that was part of the Palastinian blockade run earlier.

I call BS on this one. Just more fear mongering.



posted on Sep, 12 2012 @ 05:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by ZeroKnowledge



“We knew the region was ‘hot’ after two Turkish jets were downed by Syria but a warning about an Israeli attack during a joint exercise is almost bizarre if not unreal. There are few if almost none in service who still feel there is a grudge to settle over the USS Liberty incident.

Honestly, is Mossad giving this site false info to discredit them further or they are just that smart themself?
Dear ATS posters that buy this stuff - enlighten me, what 2 Turkish jets were downed by Syria?
How you can trust this "source" if it has no clue about what it says is beyond me.


www.nytimes.com...

maybe it wasn't 2 jets downed by Syria but there is 1



posted on Sep, 12 2012 @ 06:15 AM
link   
reply to post by jiggerj
 





We put up with all of this crap for oil? JEEZ!!!!!


Isn't oil the backing/substance of the fiat petro-dole-ar, the means to pay for the wars/military industrial complex for Rotchild's one world currency/religion/politic and other related foolishness?

Net'a'Yahoo, always gets tight around the britches when Rothschild threatens to cut his allowance or the belt from his trousas. They are both as a self fulfilling prophecy, without the prophet though with the Profit.
For some "The World is Not enough" to fill the hole in the heart and and the soul of a static th-park..

One should wonder why some of the wealthiest in history have most often left the world by their own hand while leaving their flock the crumbs of an empire with their family to fight over whats left, bereft of any substance of matter. Every day seems as closer to a Phoenix rising from the ashes of arses balancing on a tightrope with silence on the left and truth on the Right.



posted on Sep, 12 2012 @ 07:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by nighthawk1954
The US Navy AEGIS Destroyer, Nicknamed the USS Rachel Corrie, Warned of Attack.

Apparently the US Navy does not want a repeat of 1967!
Your thoughts?

www.veteranstoday.com...


More like Israel does not want the dog to turn on its master.

Dempsey is already ready to nuke Israel. His 'dissent' is no act of the administration. He knows what siding with Israel would lead to, and he also knows what Israel is capable of when desperate, in the current time period it is in.

A Chief of the Joint Chiefs will not allow America to be destroyed on his watch, no matter how vile he might or might not be.

1967 was chalked up as collateral damage, as the US 'gambled' with involving itself with Israel to begin with, as now we see the outcome of bad betting, to try to leverage your own position, when your opponent naturally is card counting.

The Military no longer supports Israel, for the stakes are to high, for such a low pot to begin with.

With Africa yielding to the Chinese economically, Israel is a lost cause at this point, for any further betting against, or for, for China will dominate Africa economically, and whoever controls commerce controls power right now.

This will not last long, as the ones consuming the vast quantities of precious metals, raw materials(this is all China of course), and whatever else you can get your hands on, will eventually hoard the entire stockpile within the Nation, and use it, but mainly sit on it.

All the stuff being made today by china is the "dross" from the precious, that is sold to 'everyone'.

As the hoarding continues, the value of it will go up.

How does this affect, and effect Israel?

The more obvious question, that will affect Israel, is how will these tactics by China affect the US, which obviously is the protection force of Israel?

That double domino will have vast repercussions in the speed of topple, once these two are turned over.



posted on Sep, 13 2012 @ 07:32 PM
link   
I would also suspect that since this destroyer is better equipped than the USS Liberty to defend themselves that the Israelis thought better not to attack a real warship not a lightly equipped surveillance vessel.

Israel is not our ally or they would not be meddling in US politics and spying on us.....

If I were president when Pollard was caught I would have broken all ties with Israel and stopped sending them welfare payments!

Israel and the Jewish ideology have been damaged beyond comprehension since WWII and they have turned into a militant state that is jut as bad as those they fight.



posted on Sep, 13 2012 @ 07:56 PM
link   
reply to post by gladtobehere
 


I was thinking of "shenanigans".



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1   >>

log in

join