It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The average change in corona diameter for the physical stressor was
2.9 mm. This represents an increase in corona size. The increase ranqes
from -1 nin (a decrease in diameter) to 10 mm. The average variance is
4.7 nmm. This large variance, as well as the large variance calculated
for the mental stressor, provide further evidence of the wide variation
of stress responses among individuals. In other words, this large
variance may be expected when performing experiments of this nature.....
purpose of this research was to determine whether or not Kirlian
photography is a statistically significant method of assessing mental or
physical fatigue. Kirlian photography seems to have this potential.
As may be seen in Chapter IV, a statistically significant change is
observed for both the mental and physical stressors applied. A decrease
in corona diameter was observed after applying the mental stressor. An
increase in corona diameter was observed after applying the physical
stressor. The importance of the level of significance (0.99) should
not be taken lightly....
For example, in testing for mental fatigue, what is being
measured? Is it boredom, exhaustive thinking or simply the lack of
body activity associated with sitting at a desk for several hours? When
the 'after' photograph is taken, did the subject just complete a brisk
walk? If so, this may Iend to camouflage the mental fatigue effect of
a decreased corona diameter, i.e. physical fatigue or stimtlation would
tend to increase the corona diameter.
Kirlian photography is a fascinating phenomenon. The photographs
produced are static representation of the pulsating life associated with
'living' matter....The research performed for this report and its
statistical significance is additional positive evidence that these
photographs are reflections of the body's physical and mental condition.
Originally posted by john_bmth
Personally, I think the images kind of speak for themselves.
Really? How exactly do the images equate to better or worse quality food?
So the food with the vibrant unbroken field IS THE HEALTHIEST.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Unity_99
So the food with the vibrant unbroken field IS THE HEALTHIEST.
Very interesting. I'd be very curious to see how well a raw, unprocessed but dehydrated "Superfood" would fare against a beer or a soda in this manner of evaluation.
He uses full spectrum light photos
Originally posted by eleven44
Apparently a study was done using Kirlian photography to show the difference of energy in foods that are organically grown and raw, versus foods that were commercially grown and cooked.
Personally, I think the images kind of speak for themselves.