It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Montana Rep. Denny Rehberg has been pounding Democratic Sen. Jon Tester over lobbyist fundraising in their tight Senate race, but Rehberg declared last year in a meeting with the influence peddlers that he probably would have chosen their profession over his own if he had been "smart."
And further, he declared they were not only honorable, but that he could not do his job without them.
"A lot of y’all’s type came to me and said, 'What are you nuts? You know, if we had the choice of either run for Congress or be a lobbyist, wouldn’t you like to try the Congress first?' And I fell for it," Rehberg said. "I ran for Congress. I probably, if I had been smart, I would’ve said nope, no, I think I’ll stay out of the political arena and go into lobbying.
"What I’m trying to suggest is I think lobbying is an honorable profession," he said.
"What I’m trying to suggest is I think lobbying is an honorable profession," he said
Lobbyists and corrupt politicians like him are the problem, not the government. People like him ruin the government.
The records also suggest that lobbyists with personal connections to the White House enjoy the easiest access.
Republican lobbyists coming to visit are rare, while Democratic lobbyists are common, whether they are representing corporate clients or liberal causes.
The reason lobbyist exist is to voice there opinions on laws that effect their livelyhoods in many ways. As government grows so does lobbying.
Only way to get rid of lobbyists is to shrink the power and size of government no amount of "laws" is ever going to change that fact.
No amount of condemnation of lobbyists will ever change that fact Government is the enemy if anyone ever read those documents written by the founders they have all said in numerous ways government has never been friend to the people.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by openlocks
I'm an anarchist at heart...but it just isn't realistic and would bring down the quality of life to have none. Anytime you cut police forces, crime goes up. Government just seems like a necessary evil to me.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by openlocks
Yeah but, organized crime could form, do whatever it wants...steal peoples land, force women into sexual slavery, extort people to kill any sort of free market. Government is just as evil as humans, without government our evil would oppress others in different forms.
Nobody would argue, besides the mobster, that organized crime is inherently good or productive.
With more property owners came more disputes that needed settling, contracts that needed enforcing, and properties that needed protecting. Because the authorities were undermanned and unreliable, property owners turned to extralegal arbitrators and protectors. These extralegal protectors would eventually organize themselves into the first Mafia clans.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by openlocks
Government just seems like a necessary evil to me.
I don't know...the mafia could help save our property from human vultures staking out your private property since there wouldn't be state police around. That's actually how they started off.