Electromagnetic Effects Associated with Unidentified Flying Objects.

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Bedlam

I was wondering that too. And whats so special about starlight. Couldn't the ship produce it's own light in plenty of quantity.

Erno86, Why do you think Foo Fighters are space invaders. Why not some crazy human developed thing? Also, 1976 is 31 years after the US captured the German Rheotron. Nobody could come up with a glowing ball that flies through the air except space aliens?

Why do I think Foo Fighters are space invaders?

Because a U.S. general said any trespass over or on U.S. territory...of an unauthorized ship --- Is considered an invasion --- Peaceful or not.

I have not seen any versions of "glowing balls that fly through the air" in any current U.S. battlefield theatres.

What's so special about starlight?

Because seawater is a finite fuel for fusion plasma generation, for a starship that requires it to fly at superluminal speed between star systems. Seawater is mainly needed for the starship in places that lack starlight....while the unlimited abundance of starlight abounds in our universe --- hence the ability for the micro-mini black hole propulsion unit onboard the starship, too operate with an unlimited amount of fuel for interstellar travel.

a reply to: BASSPLYR

Here's one video on the theory of black hole starship propulsion. My theory is a little different.

Link:

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: Erno86

OK watched the video. The idea of using solar panels hundreds of miles across in some giant Dyson like sphere like monstrosity to power lasers that converge and create a tinsy black hole, after a one year charge up, just so that the hawkings radiation pushes the craft is stupid. Why would we need sun light and solar panels to produce the energy needed? We already have better ways to make the energy.

So I would like to hear the differences in your propulsion theory with the one in the video. Wanna hear how sea water and sunlight play critical rolls.

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Erno86

OK watched the video. The idea of using solar panels hundreds of miles across in some giant Dyson like sphere like monstrosity to power lasers that converge and create a tinsy black hole, after a one year charge up, just so that the hawkings radiation pushes the craft is stupid. Why would we need sun light and solar panels to produce the energy needed? We already have better ways to make the energy.

So I would like to hear the differences in your propulsion theory with the one in the video. Wanna hear how sea water and sunlight play critical rolls.

Pulverise a small rogue black hole with an antimatter bomb probe. Grab a small piece with a tractor beam and haul it to a factory on an asteroid. Refine it into a piece smaller than a proton and put it a stasis sphere container on a freebird starship.

Set-up a starlight receptor on the hull of the saucer. Focus the receptor on a distant star or galaxy, so the starlight photons are sucked into the micro-mini black hole stasis sphere. The photons form a accretion disc and are ejected out of both of the magnetic poles of the black hole at near the speed of light.

The ejected photons are funneled by a tube or tubes to a thruster port at various locations on the bottom hull of the saucer, with the hull having the ability to rotate separately from the top hull. The photon receptor port closes and the hull thruster port rotates 180 degrees --- the photon receptor port opens for an instant stop --- Same way for different sharp angle turns --- including a top an bottom thruster port in the center of the craft.

Speed increases --- exponentially squared --- easily up to the speed of light barrier and beyond into the superluminal realm.

In places that lack starlight...small amounts of seawater would possibly be required too supply fusion generated photons for the propulsion unit. The micro-mini black hole would generate it's own magnetic fields --- and besides making the saucer anti-gravitational --- one magnetic field would press the injected seawater against the other field with extreme pressure till the fusion reaction occurs; thusly providing the propulsion unit with a new source of photons.

Cheers,

Erno

a reply to: Erno86

Collect distant starlight? Why not just tape a flashlight on a boom to the front of the disc and shine it at the photon collectors?

Why even put the photo voltaic cells on the outside of the ship?
Blow some anti matter and feed the 511 to some "Klimov" Quantum Solar Cells that Los Alamos is developing.

Heck forget the 511 just use a glow in the dark strip as the photon source.

Boom!!! Near 100% efficient solar panels collecting antimatter generated light and energy. No need for fusion or cruising around with Sea World in the hold to fuel the ship.

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Erno86

Collect distant starlight? Why not just tape a flashlight on a boom to the front of the disc and shine it at the photon collectors?

Why even put the photo voltaic cells on the outside of the ship?
Blow some anti matter and feed the 511 to some "Klimov" Quantum Solar Cells that Los Alamos is developing.

Heck forget the 511 just use a glow in the dark strip as the photon source.

Boom!!! Near 100% efficient solar panels collecting antimatter generated light and energy. No need for fusion or cruising around with Sea World in the hold to fuel the ship.

You'd probably need the Eveready rabbit to supply you with a constant source of batteries, if you used a flashlight as your photon fuel source. Even though flashlights demonstrate photon thrust when lit.

Seriously now...the micro-mini black hole propulsion unit, would probably have the power to suck in any small nearby light source that wasn't sufficiently tied down.

A small amount of stored seawater --- yet finite --- is probably sufficient to sustain a fusion reaction for a long time --- Yet the need for refueling with seawater is a necessary need if it is depleted --- Which gives me reason as to why the star travelers like our planet so much.

Thread discussing the Levelland series of UFO sightings which stalled car engines in 1957:


The ‘Tex’-Files : Engine Stopping UFO - Levelland, Texas 1957

I always wondered if maybe there wasn't a kind of "time" component to the reports of electrical power being cut off when a UFO appears and then restored when it leaves. Like the area around the UFO was distorting time in such a way that it was throwing the EM "out of phase" or something like that?

The part that generally intrigues me is that the electric or electronic machines will conk out, but human beings, who also have an electro-chemical nervous system, don't seem to be affected that much by it -- most of the time. I don't know how shifting time out of phase would affect a person. I assume it would be disorienting.

a reply to: Blue Shift


What would happen in the case of a basket sized ball of electrons, as with regards to ball lightning.But also ordinary lightning to a certain effect. If we consider that the electron is in itself is positionaly fuzzy.It might mean it exists in the same state as the photon, "time locked". If its position in space time cant be located with any certainty,and the fact it dematerialises when it jumps orbital shells.Its starting to look like from the electrons point of view.It exists outside of linear time.Again if its outside of time then the speed and distance component cant be their either. So If this basket ball sized ball of electrons gets to close to an observer, isnt it reasonable to expect time field distubances.It can just go through things which would seem as no surprise, as it dosn't have any regards for time space and distance, thats from the electrons point of view anyway.

Police VHF and UHF radios fail to work in the Alan Godfrey case.

originally posted by: Jocko Flocko
reply to post by karl 12

 

From what I could gather Karl the understanding over the years regarding this type of technology has basically shifted from it being "magnetic" to "gravitational". The "magnetic well" part of the report, which was not completely understood back then or now, obviously points directly towards gravity and time; time being the 4th dimension in which we are all moving and therefore proves the theories mathematically, I think... It's fascinating stuff.

Don't know if you still on ATS Jocko but that really is an interesting statement you posted there - there's a thread below attempting to deal with the 'temporal' aspect if UFOs and factors like engine failures, stopped watches, time distortions, unusual silences, spatial changes , altered states of consciousness etc. and it also contains some interesting observations by folks like Marc Davenport, Michael P Masters and Tim Swartz.


'UFO Time Anomaly Research

Cheers.