Was Stalin Less evil Than Hitler

Originally posted by Dr Expired
Stalin and communism were responsible for more civilain deaths than Hitler....fact.

It is just your wishfull thought, not a fact.

Originally posted by Dr Expired
So why the complete lack of tolerance for Nazism and Hitler, but indifference to communism and Stalin?

Something is not right in this regard.

Humans are all equal aren't they?

If they indeed are, you can apply the same statistical methods, which were used to estimate the number of people starved under Stalin, to estimate the number of people starved during Great Depression.

Where did America’s missing millions go?

There were both mass murdering lunatics and should be remembered as such.

Its a bit like asking whether Ed Gien was less evil than Ted Bundy. Pointless.

Originally posted by justwokeup
There were both mass murdering lunatics and should be remembered as such.

Its a bit like asking whether Ed Gien was less evil than Ted Bundy. Pointless.

And who is a good guy? Just you?

They are the same levels of evil- believing that the deaths, mutilation and suffering of millions of people are somehow justified to achieve whatever "utopia" they believe they are achieving.

The epitome of human ability to become scum, to become evil- anyone debating the issue is just an apologist for the murder of tens of millions, and is a facilitator for evil, and therefore evil themselves

Originally posted by simus

Originally posted by justwokeup
There were both mass murdering lunatics and should be remembered as such.

Its a bit like asking whether Ed Gien was less evil than Ted Bundy. Pointless.

And who is a good guy? Just you?

I'm gonna hazard a guess and say he is less evil, much less evil than Stalin, Hitler, Bundy and Gein- ok, how about that, I'm making that call, now you go prove me wrong there yeah

Originally posted by blueorder

Originally posted by simus

Originally posted by justwokeup
There were both mass murdering lunatics and should be remembered as such.

Its a bit like asking whether Ed Gien was less evil than Ted Bundy. Pointless.

And who is a good guy? Just you?

I'm gonna hazard a guess and say he is less evil, much less evil than Stalin, Hitler, Bundy and Gein- ok, how about that, I'm making that call, now you go prove me wrong there yeah

I am quite certain that both you and the other guy whom you defend are worse that Stalin. That is less intelligent, less truthful and more cowardly.

Please refute the arguments presented in the article I linked in the previous post.

And here is a bit more reading for you.

Originally posted by simus

Originally posted by justwokeup
There were both mass murdering lunatics and should be remembered as such.

Its a bit like asking whether Ed Gien was less evil than Ted Bundy. Pointless.

And who is a good guy? Just you?

You do realise that not every conflict has a good guy and a bad guy right? Sometimes its a conflict of bad guys. On a personal level Hitler and Stalin were both monsters, the barbarity on the eastern front reflected the personalities in charge.

The list of people less monstrous than those 2 would be a long one.

Originally posted by justwokeup
You do realise that not every conflict has a good guy and a bad guy right?

And some do have?

Originally posted by justwokeup
Sometimes its a conflict of bad guys. On a personal level Hitler and Stalin were both monsters, the barbarity on the eastern front reflected the personalities in charge.

The list of people less monstrous than those 2 would be a long one.

The war is a barbaric thing. So when you are talking of barbarism on Eastern front you are saying that there was a real war there. The was nothing of importance on Western front.