It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
Maybe he's finally worked out an excuse as to why he's been linked with and photographed shaking hands with so many racists.
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
Maybe he's finally worked out an excuse as to why he's been linked with and photographed shaking hands with so many racists.
What's a definition of a racist? Be sure to not to give a racist response if its at all possible
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Perhaps he's going to put you all out of your misery and graciously accept defeat and finally retire. Perhaps then he will endorse Americas true hero, the only man who can Guide the country through it's turbulent future. Barrack Obama. He IS Americas last hope.
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Perhaps he's going to put you all out of your misery and graciously accept defeat and finally retire. Perhaps then he will endorse Americas true hero, the only man who can Guide the country through it's turbulent future. Barrack Obama. He IS Americas last hope.
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
Maybe he's finally worked out an excuse as to why he's been linked with and photographed shaking hands with so many racists.
What's a definition of a racist? Be sure to not to give a racist response if its at all possible
A person who believes one race is superior to another. Dr Paul made his views very clear when he boldly claimed that 95% of Black males in Washington are criminals.
He also states that only 5% of the black community have a sensible political opinion. I no doubt suspect you will delect blame off him and point the finger at his editor, despite the newsletter running for a couple of years and Paul not objecting to any of the remarks.
edit on 5-9-2012 by Cynicaleye because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
Maybe he's finally worked out an excuse as to why he's been linked with and photographed shaking hands with so many racists.
What's a definition of a racist? Be sure to not to give a racist response if its at all possible
A person who believes one race is superior to another. Dr Paul made his views very clear when he boldly claimed that 95% of Black males in Washington are criminals.
He also states that only 5% of the black community have a sensible political opinion. I no doubt suspect you will delect blame off him and point the finger at his editor, despite the newsletter running for a couple of years and Paul not objecting to any of the remarks.
edit on 5-9-2012 by Cynicaleye because: (no reason given)
But its the truth........If everything he said in that regard is true then how is being truthful racist?
Originally posted by de_Genova
But its the truth........If everything he said in that regard is true then how is being truthful racist?
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
Maybe he's finally worked out an excuse as to why he's been linked with and photographed shaking hands with so many racists.
What's a definition of a racist? Be sure to not to give a racist response if its at all possible
A person who believes one race is superior to another. Dr Paul made his views very clear when he boldly claimed that 95% of Black males in Washington are criminals.
He also states that only 5% of the black community have a sensible political opinion. I no doubt suspect you will delect blame off him and point the finger at his editor, despite the newsletter running for a couple of years and Paul not objecting to any of the remarks.
edit on 5-9-2012 by Cynicaleye because: (no reason given)
But its the truth........If everything he said in that regard is true then how is being truthful racist?
Originally posted by MrSpad
Ron Paul has the most loyal sheep around. No wonder he can do and say whatever he wants and they just keep tossing him money.
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Perhaps he's going to put you all out of your misery and graciously accept defeat and finally retire. Perhaps then he will endorse Americas true hero, the only man who can Guide the country through it's turbulent future. Barrack Obama. He IS Americas last hope.
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
Originally posted by MrSpad
Ron Paul has the most loyal sheep around. No wonder he can do and say whatever he wants and they just keep tossing him money.
The funniest part is that they keep calling everyone else sheep.
Originally posted by WonOunce
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
Originally posted by MrSpad
Ron Paul has the most loyal sheep around. No wonder he can do and say whatever he wants and they just keep tossing him money.
The funniest part is that they keep calling everyone else sheep.
We follow a man that at least promises true freedom. Its okay to be a "sheep" when the end promise is an open field in which you can truly be free. Keep following your Shepard Obama and you will end up locked in a tiny pen with no grass no women and nothing to look at besides the sheep's ass that's in front of you.
Originally posted by NaptownBrown
It gets kind of frustrating on ATS when people post things with way overblown (and misleading) titles. This post and another post (both on the ATS front page) made it seem like RP was going to make a big annoucement. And from watching the entire interview...RP barely even spoke and he pretty much stuck to his usual talking points. In fact, if you watched the whole episode comedian Kevin Hart had a much longer interview with Leno.
I wish people on ATS weren't such sensationalists. It somewhat ruins the actual sensational posts that some of the more refined and mature ATS members bring to the table. Please stop trying to make headlines. Do some research, find something genuine and then give us the big boastful headline. Let's respect the integrity of the website and it's members.
Originally posted by Davian
I'm going to put positive energy into it and say yes. Because that guy would definitely win if he had Ron Paul on his side. Hands down.