In 2006 Al Gore launched a successful brainwashing campaign for a new pagan religion called Global Warming with his mainstream subliminal film, An
Inconvenient Truth!
Today, there is literal silence about the topic in the scientific communities. The common explanation among liberal activists (we used to call them
hippies) is that there is already 97% consensus that Global Warming real and that it is caused by humans. So why stop the conversation there? What are
you going to do about it? In reality, it is largely a political issue and the mainstream scientists are paid off to keep quiet and to lay low. There
have been little conclusive evidence to match the conclusions of the so-called Global Warming models or actual oh you know experiments to prove that
Global Warming, now known as "climate change" again, is actually caused by humans!
The last time we heard about Global Warming causing a big stir in the media was actually a scientific case against the darn thing! Despite all the
lies and the flat out rhetoric that the Global Warming religion uses to draw people into it, it is no wonder that Henrik Svensmark was right after
all. A recent 2011 CERN CLOUD experiment concluded with factual evidence that the sun directly causes Global Warming. It makes perfect logical and
scientific sense. But the media soon ripped up the report, even though they seemed to have forgotten that the IPCC never conducted experiments of
their own. Isn’t that the last step of the scientific method? To conduct experiments to back up your theory? Why the red tape? The extreme blindness
in the eyes of the religious left is more laughable than any right wing politician whom they love to attack. They took the symbols and prophetic
visions of Global Warming directly to heart. Even more so, CERN’s CLOUD experiment might not have ever happened at all if the religious heads of the
Green Lobby got their way. It is reported that the Green Lobby, “pressured the Western governments that control CERN, and almost immediately
succeeded in suspending CLOUD. It took Mr. Kirkby [creator of the project] almost a decade of negotiation with his superiors, and who knows how many
compromises and unspoken commitments, to convince the CERN bureaucracy to allow the project to proceed. And years more to create the cloud chamber and
convincingly validate the Danes’ groundbreaking theory.”
This Global Warming theory has once again hit the mainstream media but this time, again, it's a case against the idiotic theory. We all are aware that
there were larger animals during the times of the tropical dino periods. For a long time the global scientists have refused to talk about the
dinosaurs in relation to Global Warming. Did that religion also not have dinos? hmmmm. Don't make fun of the creationists for not believing in dinos
when you refuse to talk about them too!
Now, it seems that a report coming out finally realizes that warmer temperatures are actually GOOD for this planet and that it will NOT cause mass
extinctions!!!!!! Rather it would cause plant and animal population booms! Saving any credit these mainstream scientist expect to keep they backtrack
just a little bit and add that THIS study does not conclude that the rapid changes in the environment are good for species of today. It is simply a
long look at the history of all species on this planet.
Which I believe in conclusion proves once and for all that the Global Warming theory is bunk! Animals and Humans will find a way to adapt if the
climate changes as rapidly as we think it is.
Global Warming Good For BioDiversity
I am literally amazed that this report has not generated too much noise. Why is that, you have to wonder? Since the democrats have mostly moved on
from the Global Warming scandal and into a new one, "gay marriage," one has to wonder what is up with the literal silence here.
They have time and time again ignored geological research which shows that past temperature increases have always come before not after increases in
CO2. Al Gore’s movie states the exact opposite of what the geological record show because otherwise that data would make no logical sense to fit the
scheme.
edit on 3-9-2012 by jjf3rd77 because: (no reason given)
edit on 3-9-2012 by jjf3rd77 because: (no reason given)