It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dukesy
reply to post by queenofswords
You are right about a lot of the injustices and it will always go on as usual if nothing is done. A good example is Africa and is large resources for it's economy. But I for one always take a stand that it is not always America's fault nor is it just Americas responsibility to fix it alone - what a joke. Why is it always America's fault? Why are we always to blame? Are we the only ones that have screwed up the world?
I personally think Obama put the idea in the UN's suggestion box.
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by azureskys
Take your pick.
Two Cow Politics
Socialism : You have two cows. You keep one and give one
to your neighbor.
Communism : You have two cows. The government takes them
Both and provides you with milk.
Fascism : You have two cows. The government takes them and
sells you the milk.
Bureaucracy : You have two cows. The government takes them
Both, shoots one, milks the other, pays you for the milk, and
Then pours it down the drain.
Capitalism : You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull.
Corporate: You have two cows. You sell one, force the other to
produce the milk of four cows and then act surprised
When it drops dead.
Democracy : You have two cows. The government taxes you
To the point that you must sell them both in order to
support a man in a in a foreign country who has only one cow
All of the above?
anarchy...you have two cows, people come and shoot you, and take both cows.
ron paul government...you have 2 cows, people come over to buy some milk, you tell them to get their own cows if they want milk
romney government...you have 2 cows, romney buys up all the livestock feed and water rights, you get desperate and have to sell him the cows and your land.
Originally posted by zonetripper2065
The U.N building needs to be bulldozed into the sea, occupants inside preferably.
Originally posted by NorthernThird
Some here should stop spinning this as a "US versus the rest of the world" issue ... it simply isn't.
Instead, it's the decent ordinary people versus the banks.edit on 26-8-2012 by NorthernThird because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by HamrHeed
I just can't resist noting here that 10 years ago, you would have been looked at like a radical tin foil hat type to suggest the UN would levy any form of global tax, too. It's been a loooong 10 years, eh?
Originally posted by moniesisfun
"global socialism" oh noes!
let's not raise the rest of the world...let's not stabilize the population in 3rd world countries...this is evil!!
either you will consent, else it will be taken without your consent or knowledge. that much is obvious.
Originally posted by HamrHeed
This whole "world socialism" experiment is ridiculousedit on 26-8-2012 by HamrHeed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ecoparity
I propose we tax all 3rd World countries for all the Internet scams, credit card fraud, counterfeit goods, etc which originate 90+ percent from those locations.
If I had my way, we'd take the top Internet fraud countries each year and lock them out of the Internet until their governments / police start cooperating.edit on 26-8-2012 by ecoparity because: (no reason given)