october suprise-attack on iran before election

Also notice the difference between how Russia is handling Iran vs the Us handling?

Their plan is to supply Iran with the feul needed for nuclear reactors in return for them returning the spent feul rods (which can be used for making weapons by exracting the plutonium, etc).

Our plan: Bomb em!

Oh but that's right, Irans primary goal is to attack the US and give nuclear weapons to terrorists in hopes they destroy the US. But that's perfetly non-paranoid right? ;-)

after the 3rd debate I went to show a friend the original
article so I could get his opinion on it ,good or bad,
and the entire site is now gone...


Edit 10/15
The site has been removed from the internet
comment from "WRH" website - Since this article first appeared, the originating web site, www.tbrnews.org..., seems to have been taken down....

thankfully other websites also posted this article
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...

[edit on 15-10-2004 by shadowmirror]

Originally posted by shadowmirror

You stated at the end of your professional news report, LOL, that,
"If Iran gets wind of this"????
What do you think you have just done by posting this, IF there was
an ounce of truth behind it? You have clearly posted this for ALL persons
to read, including the Iranians. Do you think there aren't Iranians
reading these forums? Do you think they are blind? WOW!

Thats why I posted this for all the people to read, yes even the iranians
I wanted to see if others had any info to support or discredit this

BTW- I did not write this I copied and pasted it from the link (so my math is not off)

seekeroff
I know aussie bloke was a hoax
while reading that post there was a link the showed navy ships were being deployed out to sea. I dont remeber that part being a hoax.
I 'm sorry I should of made no reference of aussie bloke hoax as now I see
some will not take this seriously just because of that

to those that think this won't happen ,show me evidence as to why not just an opinion,
as for me its not a question of if only when
Bush already stated iran in the axis of evil
I could see this happen before the election since bush did not do well in both debates and almost definatly if he losses the last debate
as it is now a fact WMD was a lie
Bush would like nothing more to tell the american people how he just won a major victory in the war on terror (his only platform "fear")

There is NO WAY the US will get in another war until Iraq and Afgan. are restored and controlled. PLUS I think N.Korea is the next to get the smackdown by the GREAT USofA. Terrorist's better run for cover, we are commin' for your @ss!

I hope you are right moneymaker. However if Bush does plan on another invasionI think it wouldbe Iran before NK. Only because Iran does not yet have WMD so there would be no ear of retaliation like tere would be with NK. Not to mention our adminitration is known for rushing into things without a good game plan. But on the other hand, maybe all this critisism will make them think first (another benefit of our democracy).

shadowmirror,

Since this is a conspiracy site, I thought I would give my 2 cents to stoke the fires.

It is obvious hostilities are slowly coming to a boil in regards to Iran. It is only a matter of time. Given that, I took a few minutes to consider what the Bush administration had to gain from an attack in October.

In all honesty not much, if Bush wanted to be re-elected.

Then I thought about not so recent articles and more recent articles and considered there could be only one justification that would guarantee a Bush victory in Nov. Bin Laden.

If a special forces unit could insert and retrieve Bin Laden while the attacks were occuring, the whole would be "justified" in the eyes of US citizens.

Of course, this would require a level of intelligence that many would doubt the US to be capable after the WMD fiasco in Iraq-- or would it?

Edit wrong link

[edit on 14-10-2004 by Raphael_UO]

We don't have the man/womanpower to take on another attack,
let alone the funds.
Besides the draft bill was voted down.

www.lebanonwire.com...
excerp from link

According to White House and Washington Beltway insiders, the Bush administration, worried that it could lose the presidential election to Senator John F. Kerry, has initiated plans to launch a military strike on Iran's top Islamic leadership.

The Iran attack plan was reportedly drawn up after internal polling indicated that if the Bush administration launched a so-called anti-terrorist attack on Iran some two weeks before the election, Bush would be assured of a landslide win against Kerry.

According to White House sources, the USS John F. Kennedy was deployed to the Arabian Sea to coordinate the attack on Iran. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld discussed the Kennedy's role in the planned attack on Iran when he visited the ship in the Arabian Sea on October 9. Morale aboard the USS John F. Kennedy is at an all-time low, something that must be attributable to the knowledge that the ship will be involved in an extension of U.S. military actions in the Persian Gulf region

The White House leak about the planned attack on Iran was hastened by concerns that Russian technicians present at Bushehr could be killed in an attack, thus resulting in a wider nuclear confrontation between Washington and Moscow.

Hey go ahead and attack them...then you'll really find out what it's like to be a pariah state. Only in Amerika
Who sells what to whom?
informationclearinghouse.info...

OK, I am going to be blunt here, I may get a warning for this, but I do not care as I am fed up of this imbecilic warmongering attitude..

If you see Iran as a direct threat to you then you are either living in cloud cuckoo land or you are a complete moron.

There are governmental issues happening within Iran, I do not disagree on that issue, but name me a country where this is not happening.

If this is about Irans nuclear ambitions, get a grip. A country that has oil resourses is trying to get nuclear power capabilities so they can sell the said oil. It is pure and simple economic sense.

As for their weak threat of achieving nuclear arms capability, what do you expect?!?!

With countries threatening to attack their nuclear power plants, how do you expect them to react? Put yourselves in their shoes for goodness sake. I am tired of this we are better than them attitude, GROW UP!"

[edit on 22-10-2004 by Kriz_4]

We ARE better than them. We don't execute 13 year old girls for insolence for one.

The October surprise already happened.
The Red Sox beat the Yankees

I love the part where "the speech has been written, i've seen a copy of it"

darn near broke my BS meter.

If it is a cunning plan, and Bush gives this speech, does this make him a cunning linguist?

Originally posted by deevee
We ARE better than them. We don't execute 13 year old girls for insolence for one.

Just thought i would let you know that really does not happen. Do not talk about a place you have never being to (oh and unlike america, our kids dont get raped by uncles all the time, we dont have kids shooting up schools, and we dont have drunk driving leaving families with no pearents). Dont talk about a place you have never being to.

Now on another note, an attack on iran would be a mistake, America already has enough trouble controlling a country with a population of 30 million, so obviously the smartest thing to do is now to attack a country with 70 million. Alot of other county's would see this as a direct threat on Islam, (not arabs, dont forget iranians are not arabs). Now some people say that Russia is selling them the means to make nukes, why would they? They are selling them all that crap to make uranium. Its obviouse that the world knows they are selling them all that stuff, so if a nuke is made russia will get heat for it, so would it not be easyer just to sell them a freakin nuke, that way you also have a controle on the amount of war heads the country has (for personal protection).

Most people here dont know the real Iran, its not a whole american hating society, there are many american products being sold there (many that have the red white and blue on it). Iran got weapons to defend it self after threat of being bombed, that is a right, every country shoudl have that right. Iran also has a no first strike policy, they have never striked first. Now dont get me wrong, there are people in iran that probably are not to fond of the U.S, but then again, no one is really that fond you you guys these days either (sorry to say it). Even here in Canada, every time we get the chance to play and american team in hockey we just wait for one of those kids to drop a stupid line about canada, then we drop our gloves and then drop them. Many people here talking about being nuked and all that are doing exactly what bush wants you to do, be scared, think like you have to attack every thing before it can attack you, this is not a realistic way of thinking. Attacking is not always the answer, i meen look at iraq, with the huge advantage you guys have in technology and you are stuck there getting killed and jacked by a bunch of poorly trained militants. Never forget, A Jack Russel can beat a pit bull in its own yard.

You can tell that this "White House Insider" is the real deal:

I had to get my intellectual content in there.

October 10, 2004: �This time, friends, I have some very important news for all of you. Unlike the usual silly gossip that goes on around the White House, intermingled with loud praying, this is really news. We are about to embark on another war! Yes, it has been decided and carefully planned. Who are we going to war with? Iran. Background here: (I am taking this from a paper which I have to return)

Thesis: Iran hates the United States and Israel. Iran has atomic weapons and missiles (the Shahab, courtesy of North Korean/Russian technicians) It can easily reach Tel Aviv. It can also reach US troop concentrations in Iraq. Israel is scared #less. Their pressure groups have leaned on the White House, with a great deal of assistance from Cheney and the Neocons.
www.tbrnews.org...

[edit on 04/10/23 by GradyPhilpott]

Hmm, all this seems a bit daft. Even if the US leadership wanted to invade Iran, I would have thought doing it just before an election would be a very risky manouever. I can't see it happening.

It is so unfortunate how blood/war thirsty most americans are yet don't have the courage to support a draft becuase thier coward @sses would actually have to fight.

America does not have the the troop numbers or troop fortitude to support another war... Oh I forgot we will just nuke them...Yeah right... just nuke the world while we are at it... get a grip...

By the way eventually most other nations(even hated ones) will eventually get nuclear weapons too...then what? The US will have to develope another more potent death and destruction mechanism. What shining light to humanity...

The real enemy is within (government, hollywood, law enforcement, financial institutions, right wing talk show host, etc)

Nevermind the axis of evil, america will destroy herself...Its already starting...It is so "Romanesque"...So I will pop some popcorn and watch this show playout...

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
You can tell that this "White House Insider" is the real deal:

From the website
www.tbrnews.org...

The possible deaths of foreign diplomats in the attacks has been discussed and accepted as part of the price. This attack has the full support of the President who wants it launched before the elections. He can then make a speech to the American people stating that the evil Iranian nuclear weaponry has been destroyed by the Israelis with the full cooperation of his government as part of his heroic war against terrorists.

So 10 days right?

I'll be back to edit as we count them down

OKAY this makes alot of since but I have a question when you start shooting off missiles and you are basically down wind is it not stupid for this tactic to be employeed because the radioactive release from damaged nuke facilities can travel right on over to Israel and then what you screwed yourself ........if they are going to attack they are going to have to use carefully directed air and ground fire in close proximity to avoid backlash from the fall out of an acidental core breach in the reactors right????

Originally posted by snoopy

Oh but that's right, Irans primary goal is to attack the US and give nuclear weapons to terrorists in hopes they destroy the US. But that's perfetly non-paranoid right? ;-)

Absolutely, there is no reason to assume that anyone in the Islamic world wants to see us DED-dead, is there? Especially those who chant, "Death to the U.S.A." in a purely joking manner, right?

I wouldn�t say Islamic world only..If usa goes to iran it�s the last nail in the coffin...But i don�t see reason to stop now when 2 countries are already down..
hell,why not conquer the whole middle east. Then there wouldn�t be any terrorist left..would there?
And all the oil would be under usas watching eye.
-ap