It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jodlum66
reply to post by Arduous
I've been watching seismic activity for several years now. Everything seems normal so far. Before the huge Japan quake march 11th last year I think there was around a 6.4 or something. It's common for there to be subsequent quake on the opposite side of the Plate. I see them near Alaska, and then down near New Zealand quite often. All we can do is wait and see if this is a huge fore-shock.edit on 13-8-2012 by Jodlum66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jodlum66
Wait, they deleted two San Francisco quakes? Does that mean they didn't happen?
Originally posted by esteay812
Originally posted by Jodlum66
Wait, they deleted two San Francisco quakes? Does that mean they didn't happen?
If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it...
So strange and alarming that initial reports from the site would be pulled for 'what-ever' reason. I am sure those who have family there and have learned about the quakes early on are very worried, erasing the information could scare them even more.
I don't have family or friends there now, that I'm aware of, but if I did and the small bit of info I had disappeared... well I am sure I would be more worried and panicky.
When future quakes strike, hopefully the proper information will be displayed in the shortest amount of time - even if that means temporarily removing initial reports to ensure their accuracy and avoid high levels distress for those with connections to the afflicted region.
False reports occasionally are registered by USGS automatic earthquake sensors, she said.
Those sensor reports are automatically transmitted to subscribers of the agency’s earthquake notification system. Within minutes, seismologists review every report and retract those few that are false, Gordon said.
“On rare occasions we’ll have these false positives," she said. "We figure that the risk is worth it.”
“We don’t want to hold up every single notice until it’s reviewed by a seismologist. It would add 10, 20 minutes to every notice,” she said.
Originally posted by nightstalker78
reply to post by planefixer
I'm not going to rant about the things you just mentioned,as I don't want to get the thread off topic too much.
But really dude,none of the people you just mentioned are legitimate. They're just people seeking attention.
If I said right now come August 27 Cali was going to be devasted by a major earthquake..would you believe me?
And if you say yes,then I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you in Brooklyn.
Seriously though,you wouldn't.Don't believe everything you read on the Internet.
ETA : "You are right about her exact predictions as far as dates go. She has been saying there will be major EQ in Cali for awhile and has said august"
So,come sept 1st you'll stop believing her bull#?edit on 13-8-2012 by nightstalker78 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I think they'll have to do better than saying an echo... It's not like the timing was within just a few minutes or anything. Is 10+ going to be that pronounced? That's quite a glitch? Oh well.... No one's perfect... (shifts nervously)..
...they do buy to the lowest bidder, huh? Comforting thought sometimes..
(My shot of what I'd seen other members got as well...and that is still showing right now )
edit on 14-8-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)