It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by Americanist
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by Americanist
My excuse... I'm just being facetious a bit.
Sorry, but I consider ignorance of truth, such as that testified to by the OP's source, which he posted carelessly, and by you, for claiming that your "A take on Romans 1:20" was a Gnostic interpretation, to not be a facetious matter. If you believe in truth, rather than manipulative lies, I would suggest thinking before you post in the future.
What you consider Gnostic interpretation I view a more pristine translation, so perhaps you'll define the actual terms later on.
That doesn't make any sense. Set your narcissistic elitism aside and ask the question that a normal human being would ask.
Originally posted by Americanist
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by Americanist
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by Americanist
My excuse... I'm just being facetious a bit.
Sorry, but I consider ignorance of truth, such as that testified to by the OP's source, which he posted carelessly, and by you, for claiming that your "A take on Romans 1:20" was a Gnostic interpretation, to not be a facetious matter. If you believe in truth, rather than manipulative lies, I would suggest thinking before you post in the future.
What you consider Gnostic interpretation I view a more pristine translation, so perhaps you'll define the actual terms later on.
That doesn't make any sense. Set your narcissistic elitism aside and ask the question that a normal human being would ask.
Let's recap shall we... Gnostic and thinking in the same paragraph. Pretty clever to get my point across without realizing. Look, I didn't claim anything. I cited an example of how translations hold like meaning. There's no debating because we've gone from Hebrew, Latin, Greek, and now to English. Ask yourself how many versions of the Bible we have in English circa 2000. If you're searching for truth, wise up first. This amounts to a level of skill you've failed at presenting.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Americanist
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Ego bashing is good for the soul.
So is changing the litter box.
I own a dog, but significantly favor the pussy you don't have to scoop up after.
What breed? I have two pits myself.
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by adjensen
I'm going to stick with golf claps. Why? Because golf bores me.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen23
One Of the Best Books on the Subject of not just the Letters of Alphabets, but of Number and how they are Embedded into All aspects of Life is one of the Best Books I have Ever had the pleasure to read.
A Beginner's Guide to Constructing the Universe
If you take this book and use it as a study guide for a few weeks, slowly absorbing all the information it will ultimately change the way you view the Universe and your place within it.
Originally posted by TheMatrixusesYou
reply to post by DeadSeraph
Well that is a valid argument, but other that following something like that example, what might be a better suggestion as to how those symbols would have been formed?
It is assumed that there are only 22 letters for example. What if there are really twice as many in reality, but we were not taught those. I'd think there would have to be some sort of uniformity in creating things as all things are, but it would be interesting to find out if there is a better explanation than this. Personally right now I'd go with Occum's razor and just stick with this until a better explanation can be made.
Finally, it must be clearly remembered that those who evolved this block script were not only apostates from the Babylonian exile where they were much influenced by pagan ideas but they designed this new script to be a repository of occult knowledge that could be harmonised with other arcane wisdom that came to be known as the kaballah. Those who hid Egyptian occultism into Tarot and thereafter in modern playing cards did a similar thing.
In the illustration below you will see how the Divine Tetragrammaton (the Name of Yahweh) is viewed by them in anthropomorphic terms, the letters stacked one on top of the other to make the outline of their god-man, Adam Kadmon, which was absorbed into Mormonism by Joseph Smith who taught that Adam was the true god of mankind. In Brigham Young's time this was known as the 'Adam-God Doctrine' (since disavowed by the LDS Church):
in his book Hieroglyphic Monad, includes the following quote: "'Mahatma Letters,' page 345: 'The double triangle viewed by the Jewish Kabbalists as Solomon's Seal is...the Sri--Antana of the Archaic Aryan Temple, the Mystery of Mysteries, a geometrical synthesis of the whole occult doctrine. The two interlaced triangles are the Buddham-Gums of Creation. They contain the 'squaring of the Circle,' the 'Philosophers' Stone,' the great problems of Life and Death--the mystery of Evil. The Chela who can explain this sign from every one of its aspects is virtually an Adept.'"
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
I guess it's a good thing I'm not a Christian, then isn't it? I decide for my self what I want to learn and believe.