It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gibborium
reply to post by patrick1000
Well, decisively, I wondered when you would show up here. You've been busy making up aliases, I have counted about 50+ at present. Of course, that is just the number I have run across. I would think you would be tired of being band on ATS by now.
Originally posted by patrick1000
reply to post by Questionablesanity
So NASA from its inception was a way to put anything in space the Army, Navy, Air Force wanted(within the limitations of technical feasibility) without having to explain anything.
Originally posted by JesusChristwins
reply to post by chrisb9
Soon enough my dear friend Mr Obama will announce that the USA confirms the existance of other life forms in the outer space in order to promote NWO plans! For the ones that are not TV brain washed masses will keep what i am saying in the back of their heads and when it happens will understand that whatever happens around us is in fact part of the biggest play in human 's history.
Let the ones that don't believe you. Keep searching and keep up the good job. Very nice thread!
Flag it people!
Originally posted by flexy123
So if they DON'T announce anything, then it's just a matter of time until you guys make up some conspiracy story that "the truth" is hidden - and IF they announce it, then it's *also* a conspiracy to promote NWO plans?
Sorry: Lol?! I mean, no matter what, we can't get away from the conspiracy, can't we?
Originally posted by patrick1000
Let's do a hypothetical. Say by 1965 the Navy wanted to put something very particular in space that weighed 50,000 pounds. This thing, whatever it was, was needed as part of some military project. Had there not been NASA, then the payload could not be launched without the Navy giving at least some accounting of what it was doing.
The Quality of Photo's from Mars today in 2012 are not as good as way back in 1976 Because of...???
A. Industrial Pollution on Mars today in 2012 is much worse now than it was way back in 1976.
B. The Camera's where Much Better way back in 1976 as compared to the digital camera's of 2012.
C. The whole Nasa Mars Probe Landing Gig is just One Great Big Ole Scam...
Ding, Ding, Ding Ding, Ding. - - The Correct Answer is " C "
C. The whole Nasa Mars Probe Landing Gig is just One Great Big Ole Scam...
Show us only one test of Phoenix parachuted from a helicopter at Lockheed Martin airport.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Smartguy
How would throwing a spacecraft designed to land itself in a world with one third of Earth's gravity out of a helicopter test anything?
On Mars, if it was true (we can’t be sure up to when we will really measure it), the gravity would be 38% of the earth’s.
But you, before sending Curiosity to Mars, must test it to verify if that flying crane is able to slow down velocity from 360 km/h to 0 km/h and to land Curiosity softly on that planet.
Therefore you build an identical spacecraft with more power, able to land on the earth, doing all the things by itself
You can’t send a very expensive probe to Mars without testing it on the earth