It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by b14warrior
I am not a Christian, but I can tell you that your logic and insecurity of someones elses religion is extremely flawed!
Leviticus was from the old testament, (Torah) which was a set of laws for the Jews! NOT CHRISTIANS!
The New Testament is for the Christians!
Not sure why you have to post against someones religious beliefs if you don't yourself agree with them, and if you do, you might want to make sure that your posting is accurate!edit on 5-8-2012 by seeker1963 because: wording
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by VeniVidi
Originally posted by LifeInDeath
There's also the part where they say that if you break God's law by working on the Sabbath the punishment is death...DEATH!
So, don't mow your lawn on Sunday and don't have a bar-b-que because cooking is work, too. Otherwise you might be smited.edit on 8/5/2012 by LifeInDeath because: (no reason given)
Actually the true Sabbath is SATURDAY...
Actually its from sunset on Friday until sunset on Saturday...
It doesn't matter though, because Christ himself abolished the “no work” on the Sabbath rule.
Isaiah 66:22-23 For as the new heaven and the new earth which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain. (23) and it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by Malcher
The Bible, old and new testaments were written to reflect the times.
I agree completely.
Christians look at their Bible as being written by men, men are fallible.
lol!
Yeah that would be my position!
Christians look at the Bible that way!?
I thought the belief was the Bible, its words, were inspired by God as a result of direct communion with God. I agree it was written by mankind and mankind is fallible! A thumbs up from me bro!
Even still the old testament improved on some things that were considered normal for the times
If forcing a rape victim to marry their rapist is a moral improvement than I shudder to think what it was like before.
you guys cannot seem to grasp that the Bible was not written in 1985.
Wut?
The New Testament has some very profound passages...these people were very intelligent.
Profound yes. Profoundly immoral sometimes. I am very intelligent. What's your point with that?
The "Red Letter Bible" is what Jesus said.
I am aware.
I think the "union" or some form of contractual view of marriage first appeared in the old testament though. I would say this was an improvement, especially for women.
Nevermind the idea it first appeared in the Bible, elaborate on how that's an improvement for women.edit on 7-8-2012 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by murphy22
No argument from me there.
I am thankful for our moral understanding has evolved enough that we are not stoning people to death for working on the Sabbath.
Now it's time for Jesus to come back and make a New New Covenant that abolishes both the sin and the ritual of the OT.
You misunderstand what the purpose of humanities entire experience on this Earth is about and its role in the Universe at large.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by JesuitGarlic
You misunderstand what the purpose of humanities entire experience on this Earth is about and its role in the Universe at large.
Wow! What a profoundly bold position to take. Well my fellow human, I think your religious belief that you understand God's mind is absolutely absurd to say the least. I think you're absolutely immoral to make such determinations of my belief simply because I don't believe in your belief. I do not profess the purpose of mankind, you do, and therefore the burden of proof is on you.
I understand God's mind in this point because.....
You have produced some decent texts here but you too are not understanding the full context of the Divine Law, the path of righteousness, and the need for repentance of transgression from the law still.
Well, now you don't seem mad. Before you did. I'm not mad either, but if you come after in a way that I think or feel is hypocritical, I'm going to say something. Anyway, it's like that for everybody who expresses an opinion that someone else strongly opposes. I really didn't assume anything about your views. I didn't actually think your were a christian. I'm an agnostic. And I am strongly for acceptance - beyond tolerance. I've read and studied religious texts too. I feel that you didn't see my perceptions the way you thought you did or think you can, and you made an assumption about me. I'm not saying I'm right. I'm saying that is how I felt about the whole thing.
Originally posted by juleol
reply to post by b14warrior
Yet not a single christian lives according to these rules. But I guess it is okay since they can just ask Jesus for forgivance... Does not matter if you murder someone or just lie to someone as you are still accepted into heaven as long as you ask for forgivance...
18 And He *said to them, “Are you so lacking in understanding also? Do you not understand that whatever goes into the man from outside cannot defile him, 19 because it does not go into his heart, but into his stomach, and is eliminated?” (Thus He declared all foods clean.)
For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.
Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.
For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, “ YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF (emphasis retained from the original text of the NASB).”
26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.
Why would you serve an entree of meat to those who are still in need of milk?