It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You are the perfect hypocrite. Provide your refuting data or stay out of the discussion.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by imagineering
And both articles say that the police are reporting that the story has no basis.
Originally posted by BenReclused
reply to post by imagineering
Serious? Illegal drugs are ILLEGAL!
There are no "illegal drugs"! There ARE only CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES!
To provide them to the public is no different then being a dealer.
Nope, that's not quite true! Contrary to your silly notions, there ARE individuals, as well as facilities, that DO provide "controlled substances" to the public legally.
Troll much?
Idiots that don't like to provide sources validating their claims seem to think so. Are you one of them?
Use your common sense.
That's pretty good advice! You should learn to follow it.
See ya,
Milt
Roeske’s statement did not appear to rule out the possibility that officers could have acted independently. He noted that the video did not explicitly name officers that allegedly provided the drugs
Minnesota law enforcement has a history of reaching out to the drug-using community for help with DRE training. CBS News reports that when the State Patrol needed a real-life laboratory, the state's Needle Exchange program — part of the Minnesota AIDS Project — lent a hand.
The organization put out an ad to its clients, many who used drugs. It asked them to show up under the influence, and advertised that they would receive rewards and incentives in return. Officers noted that users were not offered money or any illegal incentives.
In a press release issued earlier today, Minnesota Public Safety Commissioner Mona Dohman announced that the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has launched a criminal investigation into allegations that a Hutchinson police officer provided marijuana to a DRE program participant last week.
i would point out that no police force has the authority to dispense, for use, schedule 1 narcotics.
Originally posted by BenReclused
reply to post by imagineering
You are the perfect hypocrite. Provide your refuting data or stay out of the discussion.
YOU didn't provide any DATA to refute. You only made a vague claim! That claim has since been refuted by my "common sense"!
Only if by 'vague claim' you mean 'video of an officer discussing it'. I openly welcome you correcting my understanding of the video i just watched, if i have not seen things correctly.
Certainly a manipulation and abuse of the law!
Youre correct, though, that all you have offered to bolster your own opinion is, well, your own opinion.
Originally posted by BenReclused
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
i would point out that no police force has the authority to dispense, for use, schedule 1 narcotics.
Then please do so with a valid source.
See ya,
Milt
no doctors nor any pharmacist is allowed to prescribe schedule 1
Schedule I,
a category of drugs not considered legitimate for medical use. Among the substances so classified by the Drug Enforcement Agency are mescaline, lysergic acid diethylamide, heroin, and marijuana. Special licensing procedures must be followed to use these or other Schedule I substances.
I DID do my own research and came up with nothing.