It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DrHammondStoat
this official 'blimp tracker' confirms a blimp is over London at the moment.
www.goodyearblimp.co.uk...
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Human_Alien
Where's the proof it was a blimp?
Have you read the thread (not sarcasm)? You know the Goodyear blimp is there like it always is at the Olympics, right? Why would you even doubt that this is the blimp?
Because I'm aware of OP's work and.............I'm living in the year 2012 where up is down.
I am not so much doubting it's the blimp. I am simply asking.......besides "assuming it's the blimp" what else you got?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by DBCooper71
Yes.
And yes, it is a blimp.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
First, the video is not "The OP's work". Set aside your bias if you will and look at the facts here alone. If you know the blimp is there to cover the Olympics then why on Earth would you believe it's anything else? It looks like the blimp, it acts like the blimp.
Originally posted by isitjustme
Because of all the VIPs I thought there was a strict no fly zone over the stadium during the opening
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by DBCooper71
None in particular.
The problem is that often a lack of sufficient information and a reliance on eyewitness testimony often makes it impossible to offer "mundane" explanations. This does not mean that a UFO is unidentifiable or unexplainable or extraterrestrial. It just means that there is not enough information.
thougt "now thats weird"?.
I can ASSUME it was the Blimp because the Blimp was scheduled to be there.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
Let's not forget that it sounds like the blimp.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Human_Alien
I can ASSUME it was the Blimp because the Blimp was scheduled to be there.
Is that really an assumption? How much proof do you need here? You know it's there, the object looks like the blimp and moves like the blimp. Your desire for more proof than that seems to me to be in stark contrast to your usual willingness to believe virtually anything that can be called a "ufo" to be alien in nature.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
Let's not forget that it sounds like the blimp.
I'm sure some of them would say that's just part of the disguise.