It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A reasonable question to ask if you’re into studying migration patterns of ancient people. According to the late historian Glenn Kimball the tribes (descendants of the Exodus) were never really lost at all, so what gave Kimball the confidence to say this? Quite simple, the Lost Tribes can be found deep within the Kolbrin Manuscript. Kimball studied the Coelbren text for many years and ultimately came to the conclusion that: “the Kolbrin can rightfully be called the lost Bible of the Ten Lost Tribes.”
There’s no question large-scale natural catastrophes can force people to migrate. A natural trigger event can induce mass-movements of the population very quickly and a classic example of this comes from Exodus in the Old-Testament.
The Kolbrin Manuscript clearly states that the trigger event in this case was the Destroyer that literally ‘passed-over’ the Khumry forefathers heads whilst they were fleeing Egypt:
MAN:6:21 The land writhed under the wrath of the DESTROYER and groaned with the agony of Egypt. It shook itself and the temples and palaces of the nobles were thrown down from their foundations. MAN:6:22 There were nine days of darkness and upheaval, while a tempest raged such as never had been known before. When it passed away brother buried brother throughout the land. Men rose up against those in authority and fled from the cities to dwell in tents in the outlands.
Originally posted by Argyll
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
lol....your a one aren't you!
Split hairs all you like!.....In a lot of threads I have read on ATS, regardless of the subject, when you show yourself, invariably, you steer the topic to "PlanetX"......your user name proclaims "PlanetXisHERE"......would it not be unreasonable of me to assume that planetX be some sort of "pet" subject of yours?
So.....I'll ask again.....when do you, having done all the research that you claim to have done, expect PlanetX to be a real and present danger?
simple question mate.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
If Nibiru had been here 3,600 years ago Earth would not be in the nice comfortable orbit it now is.
It's not in the same orbit as it was pre-Exodus, why do you think the Egyptians had a 360 day calendar? Earth was closer to the Sun before the last pass of Planet X, and was pulled into a slightly greater orbit. Maybe next year we'll have to shorten the calendar if we get pulled back closer. Or ski season will be longer if we get pulled further out this time.
The ancient civil Egyptian calendar had a year that was 365 days long and was divided into 12 months of 30 days each, plus five extra days (epagomenae, from Greek ἐπαγόμεναι) at the end of the year. The months were divided into three weeks of ten days each. Because the ancient Egyptian year was almost a quarter of a day shorter than the solar year and stellar events therefore "wandered" through the calendar, it has been referred to as the annus vagus, or "wandering year".
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by Argyll
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
lol....your a one aren't you!
Split hairs all you like!.....In a lot of threads I have read on ATS, regardless of the subject, when you show yourself, invariably, you steer the topic to "PlanetX"......your user name proclaims "PlanetXisHERE"......would it not be unreasonable of me to assume that planetX be some sort of "pet" subject of yours?
So.....I'll ask again.....when do you, having done all the research that you claim to have done, expect PlanetX to be a real and present danger?
simple question mate.
I'm sorry you are flat out wrong and incorrect, there are many threads in which I have participated and have not brought up Planet X. The threads in which I did would definitely be less than half - feel free to prove me wrong.
Planet x was a great interest of mine until I realized whether it existed or not wasn't all that important for myself (though I would like to save my child and spare him suffering), and I have now come to realize your spiritual awareness and orientation is the most important part of this life, and if you are spiritually prepared you can weather any storm, if you are not spiritually prepared nothing else you do will matter, and that there are actions you can take in this life, such as keeping mankind's sacred truths secret that may cause your soul to suffer enternally.
The answer to your last question is in the video, if you don't want to watch a video from youtube that is not my problem. What is wrong, you truly want to know the date but feel someone might be watching your online habits?
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Once again there is a difference between the Kolbrin and ancient manuscripts. The Bible, The Koran, the Torah, the Bhagavad Gita, the Tao Te Ching, etc., each of these are mentioned in other documents and by historians throughout their entire existence. We even have references to documents that no longer exist like the Gospel of Eve. Yet there is not a single reference to the Kolbrin throughout all of history. Nobody even claimed to know of its existence until Kimball decided he could make a buck off of it. Why do you think this is? Why do you think the history Kimball claimed the Kolbrin had was false? Why do you think that Kimball would only allow the Kolbrin to be studied at a "university" he owned? None of these things point to it being legitimate. Do you know how to create the best lies? You draw from sources that people trust so it then looks like they corroborate your story. That's exactly what Kimball did and you have fallen for his con.
The Kolbrin is a collection of ancient manuscripts said to have been salvaged from the Glastonbury Abbey arson in 1184. During the early fourteenth century, John Culdy, the leader of a small community in Scotland, owned The Kolbrin and took steps to ensure its survival beyond his care.
Originally posted by SFWatcher
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
I listened to the whole thing. Again, he had few details (verifiable and otherwise), and those that he did state (infa-red reference), distance to earth, and relative speed seemed to COMPLETELY fly in the face of his source's warning.
That -- and the method by which "dependents" were informed, along with NDA's? No way. Totally unrealistic and the absolute WORST way to keep a secret.
Sorry, gotta chalk this up to 100% "may source says" and speciation....
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by Dizrael
It is not so much that I believe or don't believe, it is as I said the consequences of doing nothing if this is true greatly outweigh the consquences of doing something to prepare if it is false. Why take a chance?
Originally posted by SFWatcher
reply to post by SFWatcher
But with my above-post being said, I enjoy the topic....it DOES make one think, and I applaud you for highlighting this. I mean seriously, if these discussions never happen, how can we critically analyze threats at all?
The answer to your last question is in the video, if you don't want to watch a video from youtube that is not my problem. What is wrong, you truly want to know the date but feel someone might be watching your online habits?
Originally posted by Dizrael
then you have no problem giving us the date? good to hear. i anxiously await your response, of the date to expect the WORST side effects