John Moore Nibiru updates - can you afford to ignore this?

reply to post by vkey08


I have insulted no one, it would be nice if you could enter the topic of Niburu and how it relates to the John Moore video on preparedness. Also, it is apparent when reading your reply to me you have not properly ascertained my statements.

reply to post by FX44rice

The government lies and tells me I should be prepared for disaster.
John Moore has to lie to sell stuff.
Help me.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by FX44rice

 

The government lies and tells me I should be prepared for disaster.
John Moore has to lie to sell stuff.
Help me.

edit on 7/28/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)

So maybe many citizens not trusting the govt (perhaps) do not listen to the govt telling them to be prepared. Plus most of the population is quite ignorant. Therefore, they will listen to a snake-oil salesman like John Moore tell them outlandish tales of niburu and to get prepared.

If that's what it takes so they can be prepared for the next hurricane etc., so be it. I will appreciate not dealing with unprepared human animals.

reply to post by FX44rice

Plus most of the population is quite ignorant. Therefore, they will listen to a snake-oil salesman like John Moore tell them outlandish tales of niburu and to get prepared.

I disagree with your assessment of the population. I think most are bright enough to recognize nonsense when they see it. But thanks to the internet those that are ignorant and fearful are easily accessible to snake-oil salesman.

So what happens when they find out that Moore has lied to them? Do you think they will continue to keep their preparations in order?

Originally posted by FX44rice
reply to post by vkey08

 

I have insulted no one, it would be nice if you could enter the topic of Niburu and how it relates to the John Moore video on preparedness. Also, it is apparent when reading your reply to me you have not properly ascertained my statements.

Not one person has stated that it's a bad thing to be prepared so I don't understand why the condescending tone. The OP clearly stated that there was proof of Nibiru through this radio show with John Moore. Moore is making money off of Nibiru, and it behooves him to make people fear it. Many have now shown that it is impossible for Nibiru to exist, but none have stated that it's not a good idea to be prepared.. so ?

Could you try your point again with out the venom and condescension?

reply to post by Phage


You're looking for a perfect world. It doesn't exist. Just let it be, people like Moore and others.

Now I'm not certain if you take more issue with the messenger or the message??

It bothers you so bad that this guy is "potentially" making false claims?

You seem to be a person with plenty of time on their hands to research things. Why in the world do you stay focused on this? Why in the world don't you take all that energy out on the unbelievably damaging things our govt is doing?

You pick on this little guy John Moore? Why not look at all the problems our failed govt is creating and pick apart them??

Doesn't make sense to me.

Originally posted by vkey08

Not one person has stated that it's a bad thing to be prepared so I don't understand why the condescending tone. The OP clearly stated that there was proof of Nibiru through this radio show with John Moore. but none have stated that it's not a good idea to be prepared.. so ?

I can't reconcile these statements. Myself and John Moore have emphatically stated we are both unsure as to the existence of Planet X/Nibiru. But there is a load of circumstantial evidence, and he is getting his info from trusted government sources.

However, we would rather warn people with the caveat nothing may happen, and look like idiots, rather than say nothing and have it happen and miss the opportunity to warn thousands.

Here is exactly what I stated in the OP:

He hopes it isn't true, but he cannot afford to ignore it.

If this is not true, and he looks like a fool, he would take that over it being true, and not taking the chance to warn people.

He also says this - treat this as an exercise - a chance to practice your bug out preparations.

There have been posters on this thread that have basically advocated doing nothing, as if this is true it would be a waste of time.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE



If, as you claim, you are unsure about the existence of PlanetX/Nibiru, your user name is one hell of a misnomer. Couple this with the fact that your avatar used to be the Swiss bank note that some people purport to show the orbit of Nibiru, I'd say that you have at least one foot in the believer camp.

Originally posted by oxbow
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

If, as you claim, you are unsure about the existence of PlanetX/Nibiru, your user name is one hell of a misnomer. Couple this with the fact that your avatar used to be the Swiss bank note that some people purport to show the orbit of Nibiru, I'd say that you have at least one foot in the believer camp.

I'm leaning towards the Planet X camp but I'm not convinced, but I have learned if you have your spiritual house in order it doesn't really matter what happens to you, thus the change in avatar, is that okay with you?

I have seen too much that can't be explained by climate change or increased Sun activity, especially all the tectonic activity, the 188 day earthquake cycle, unexplained booming noises from around the world, about a hundred fold increase in sinkholes from around the world:

Here is what one country's top seismologist had to say:

thewatchers.adorraeli.com...

Sinkholes indicating geological rift zones pulling apart:

thewatchers.adorraeli.com...

More sinkholes and sinkholes explained:

poleshift.ning.com...

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by oxbow
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

If, as you claim, you are unsure about the existence of PlanetX/Nibiru, your user name is one hell of a misnomer. Couple this with the fact that your avatar used to be the Swiss bank note that some people purport to show the orbit of Nibiru, I'd say that you have at least one foot in the believer camp.

I'm leaning towards the Planet X camp but I'm not convinced, but I have learned if you have your spiritual house in order it doesn't really matter what happens to you, thus the change in avatar, is that okay with you?

I have seen too much that can't be explained by climate change or increased Sun activity, especially all the tectonic activity, the 188 day earthquake cycle, unexplained booming noises from around the world, about a hundred fold increase in sinkholes from around the world:

Here is what one country's top seismologist had to say:

thewatchers.adorraeli.com...

Sinkholes indicating geological rift zones pulling apart:

thewatchers.adorraeli.com...

More sinkholes and sinkholes explained:

poleshift.ning.com...

How many people have to show you Nancy Lieder is a hoax and a liar before you believe it, Poleshift Ning is just Zetatalk's new home, Zetatalk = Nancy Lieder, not one thing is posted without her approval there... The woman is dangerous, she has driven kids to commit suicide and had even advocated (as well as doing it herself) killing pets.. these are facts.. She also has moved her date so many times it's like changing underwear... Poleshift Ning is about as reliable as a source as Fox News is Democratic leaning...

I love you guys. and Phage, you are correct about every single thing you say and think about me. I suck. But don't get me wrong. My self-esteem is OK for what little i am worth. I just think there are bigger and greater things than myself, and i am glad to be a part of this vast cosmic symphony. May you all have long and wonderful lives. And also keep an eye out for that Nibiru. I'm pretty sure it is going to land during the 2012 olympics during mossads attack on their own people. why else would they have so many missile launchers?

reply to post by DeathShield

I beg your pardon?

I have said little "about you" or what I think about you. I suggested that you acquire some knowledge about astronomy and orbital mechanics because, by your statements, you seem to be lacking in those areas. I also said that you seem touchy. That also seems to be true.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Char-Lee

 

In 1556 monks said the Earth was the center of the universe. They could hardly be expected to understand what a comet actually is.

edit on 7/26/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)

You mean this monk said the Earth was at the center? hmmm...seems to have died in 1543...

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by FX44rice

If you are a liar, you will lie about anything. Therefore, there is substantiating evidence about many lies in the official 911 story.

Here you make the decision t hat someone/some group lied. That may or may not be true. Then you follow that up with they are a liar and will lie about anything. That does not logically follow.

It appears that you are making the decision that the government always lies and then looking for evidence to support your preconceived notion.

I have no belief either way. I am saying the govt has and would be lying if this scenario were true, and I don't blame them. You are rational, It is easy to understand why they would not inform of such a scenario.

There have been many threads about this issue and the one thing that always came up was that it was not possible to lie about this issue since the government cannot control looking up and seeing the night sky.

reply to post by FX44rice

I think you should start a thread asking All niburu believers, "How many of you have handed over a dollar to any charlatan claiming niburu's existence?"

Many people earn money from nonsense ideas. The list is long. Sitchin, Drunvalo, Little Grandmother, Hancock, Wilcock, and even Moore.

These people sell books, and lecture series, and all sorts of crap.

Maybe you are unaware of the junk that can be bought from translations of the Necronomicon to survival gear at lectures on the coming fictional planet called Nibiru. The purveyors suck money out of people that do not trust groups such as the government.

reply to post by MagicWand67

In your opinion it's unsubstantiated. Just because we haven't found a road sign underwater that says, "Welcome to Atlantis", doesn't mean it didn't exist.

There is nothing but a story from Plato. It is not my opinion that it is an unsubstantiated story. If there were any evidence other than what Plato wrote, then you would show it.. But, you can't because the story is unsubstantiated.

Lemuria and Pangea are stories too.

Lemuria is not a story. It never existed. It was a proposed land bridge to make sense of fossil distributions. Plate tectonics makes the need for such a place unnecessary. Pangaea is not a story it is the name of a super continent that the fossil and paleomagnetic data show it existed.

If human history is much older than we previously thought, which I suspect it is, Atlantis may have existed as part of a super continent. The destruction caused and the subsequent deep sea burial would make it unrecognizable.

There have been no super continents since Pangaea and humans did not exist over 200Ma.

To deny the possibility of Atlantis being a story based in reality is ignorant.

A laughable comment that does not derive from anything you have posted. This is simply a comment based on ignorance of the facts and perhaps wishful thinking.

reply to post by totallackey

There are of course exceptions. How about "most monks". Better?

But, Copernicus was a canon, not a monk. It is unknown whether he was ordained.
www.philosophy-religion.org...

His work was not published until after his death and eventually placed on the Church's prohibited book list.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by FX44rice

 

If you are a liar, you will lie about anything. Therefore, there is substantiating evidence about many lies in the official 911 story.

Here you make the decision t hat someone/some group lied. That may or may not be true. Then you follow that up with they are a liar and will lie about anything. That does not logically follow.

It appears that you are making the decision that the government always lies and then looking for evidence to support your preconceived notion.

I have no belief either way. I am saying the govt has and would be lying if this scenario were true, and I don't blame them. You are rational, It is easy to understand why they would not inform of such a scenario.

There have been many threads about this issue and the one thing that always came up was that it was not possible to lie about this issue since the government cannot control looking up and seeing the night sky.

Stereo pal -

"I am not a crook"
"Read my lips no new taxes"
"I did not have sex with that woman"

These are just the kindergarten lies.

Many threads about this issue??? What a "thread" is now the know all source??

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

I can't reconcile these statements. Myself and John Moore have emphatically stated we are both unsure as to the existence of Planet X/Nibiru. But there is a load of circumstantial evidence, and he is getting his info from trusted government sources.

Moore is playing a hedge. Many people do that. It is his out when he has to move onto another scam.

There is no circumstantial evidence for Nibiru. There is a lot of baloney.

Should anyone prepare for a fake planet that has no evidence for it at all? No way!

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by totallackey

 

There are of course exceptions. How about "most monks". Better?

Yes. Much better.

But, Copernicus was a canon, not a monk. It is unknown whether he was ordained.
www.philosophy-religion.org...

Touche'...if I take you to task for the term monk, I should have offered a formal monk...

Let us just agree the science of astronomy has a great deal of its foundation and principles due to involvement of men of religion.

His work was not published until after his death and eventually placed on the Church's prohibited book list.

So?