It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Excuse me, the guy was caught in the act.....is there going to have to be a jury?
Originally posted by stirling
Excuse me, the guy was caught in the act....
Originally posted by Kastogere
reply to post by mattdel
On topic:
The whole thing smells like yesterdays trash. There are far too many inconsistencies with the case to begin with as far as the shooter goes. Too many things don't make sense. I guess we'll have to see how this plays out. It especially doesn't make sense that he was talking to the cops, and now gives the silent treatment?
Off topic: I fully understand your reason for doing such. However, claiming yourself to be of higher mind than another poster just shows how inept you are at accepting feedback from all corners. If your gonna report someone do it with a little less pride attached to it and use a little more principal than coming off as some arrogant Mensa reject. If your gonna report someone just do so and move on. No need to make yourself look just as much a ass as the poster you propose to reject.
It makes you as a OP look tacky to do so....and you surely can't be tacky, you have a skull with flames for your avatar....which makes you malicious intent quite clear.
Originally posted by stirling
Excuse me, the guy was caught in the act.....is there going to have to be a jury?
I would expect a confession is forthcomming aong with his manifesto or whatever...like brevik in norway.....
Surely the cops know how to get him to incriminate himself.......
Originally posted by mattdel
The fact that we're creeping up on 72 hours, and not a single charge has been filed, would seem to disagree with your theory.
Originally posted by mattdel
Originally posted by stirling
Excuse me, the guy was caught in the act.....is there going to have to be a jury?
I would expect a confession is forthcomming aong with his manifesto or whatever...like brevik in norway.....
Surely the cops know how to get him to incriminate himself.......
If he was caught in the act, he would have been killed on the spot. The fact that we're creeping up on 72 hours, and not a single charge has been filed, would seem to disagree with your theory.
In many cases, if you seal your record, you gain the legal right to deny or fail to acknowledge anything to do with the arrest and the legal proceedings from the case itself.[2]
Records are commonly sealed in a number of situations:
Sealed birth records (usually for so-called closed adoption, in which the birthparents' identity is usually anonymous)
Juvenile criminal records may be sealed
Other types of cases involving juveniles may be sealed, anonymized, or pseudonymized ("impounded"); e.g., child sex offense or custody cases
Cases using witness protection information may be partly sealed
Cases involving trade secrets
Cases involving state secrets