It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
I wonder if they have any government/federal programs in the department of neuro science where he was a student?
Drug trails?Hypnosis maybe?
Originally posted by coven83
I grew up in Aurora and used to work in this theatre. It makes me very sad. this is going to be used to push more gun control, and TSA in malls and theatres.
Originally posted by paratus
I absolutely could have placed 8 of 9 shots of .380 on target in a theater.
Shooting down from above the target below the seating would be better as well.
Although I have a crimson trace laser that I'm not sure I would have used it during a gas attack due to revealing my location.
More carry permits equals a safer public...
I've heard that hypothetical many times, but I've NEVER heard of it happening in real life. I've heard of cops shooting each other. Happened right here in Florida at a football game a couple of years ago, but I've never heard of two CCW civilians shooting each other by mistake.
Originally posted by g146541
Originally posted by coven83
I grew up in Aurora and used to work in this theatre. It makes me very sad. this is going to be used to push more gun control, and TSA in malls and theatres.
With as bad as the economy currently is, to put tsa at malls would just be financial suicide for the merchants.
I along with many friends would never consent to a search to go shopping or see a movie.
It is waaay too easy to buy anything online and avoid the metal detectors/body scanners.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by miniatus
You might be right, who knows?
I only know I wouldn't have joined the crowd of victims funnelling into a nice easy kill room. My little carry gun is not accurate enough beyond about 25 feet to use it in a crowd, that is for sure. Not even with the laser sight. But, I'd rather be hunkered down, gun in hand, and knowing where the shooter was, than to be part of a crowd bottlenecked at an exit, not knowing where the shooter was.
I still don't see how there is any excuse for a single person to be able to shoot 50+.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by miniatus
I don't care if you're trained and calm as a cucumber.. but most gun owners aren't and most rarely fire them off .. at least those I know.. regardless..
There is a difference between a gun "owner" and someone that regularly carries a gun on their person.
To be honest, it is difficult to carry a gun everyday. You have to keep it concealed, you have to keep it secured, you have to give up a little comfort. You don't want it falling out in the middle of a meeting, or leaving it in a bathroom stall.
People who carry guns regularly are VERY familiar with their gun.
I agree with you that most gun "owners" are probably ill-equipped to use a gun in a tense situation, but people that might actually have carried one into a theatre are probably much more reliable to use it in that situation.