It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Springer
But would some use your argument when discussing the "freedom fighter", "hero" islamic extremist versus the sadistic blood-thirsty madman?
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Julius Caesar killed or enslaved half the Gallic population, and he did it purely for gold to pay his debts and further his career. Genocide, in modern terminology.
At the time many people (outside of Rome) probably thought of him as we think of Hitler. A mass-murdering, racist scumbag.
Now, Caesar is one of the West's great heroes.
Funny how history irons out its creases....
Originally posted by Destinyone
reply to post by FOXMULDER147
Sorry...I don't consider Hitler to be one of history's little creases...a major rip in the fabric of humanity, yes.
Des
Originally posted by Springer
reply to post by beezzer
That is a contemporary discussion that history has yet to close the books on. It's an ongoing debate between two factions (probably many more than two) who are currently challenging each other in certain regions of the world for the hearts and minds of the people.
My personal opinion is anyone who seeks to destroy innocent human life is a madman and subhuman, for the moment my opinion is up for debate. My knowledge of Hitler is not, it is historical fact.
Make sense?
S...
Originally posted by mr-lizard
If extreme right wingers are getting upset about this,
deny the Holocaust until somebody knocks some sense into you, we don't want to read about it here.
Julius Caesar killed or enslaved half the Gallic population, and he did it purely for gold to pay his debts and further his career. Genocide, in modern terminology.