It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ValentineWiggin
A 1987 death included Richard Pugh, who was a MOD computer consultant and a digital communications expert. He was found dead in his apartment with a bag over his head, his feet were bound and his body was tied in a rope that wrapped around his neck four times. The coroner called it an accident.
Seriously?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by anathema777
A Security Guard, apparently, was doing his rounds late in that night, armed, and with his German shepherd dog came upon a strange blue light within the Top Secret Area. Upon investigating this glass-walled office, he unlocked the door and walked inside the room to find a grey coloured alien, wearing headgear out of which a blue light emanated. Allegedly, this being was rifling through all the Top Secret Documents. The shock was too much apparently for the Security Guard and what he encountered blew his mind.He was then taken to a special MoD psychiatric Hospital and never seen again!
If his "mind was blown" and he's never seen again, how did his story make the rounds?
Also, the top secret documents tend to be locked away and not out for rifling.
I've also never seen a top secret area that was a glass-walled office. It sort of puts all the secrets out there to be seen, not the best plan. Generally SCIF like areas are concrete block, no windows, with usually one door. Ours has metal plating for Tempest too, like most if not all of them, although the floor has tile over it and we've got crap hung on the walls to lighten it up a bit.
It's also sort of rare for building security to have direct access to secure areas, especially by themselves. Like every other SCIF I've seen, we can't have one person in there, even if that person has clearance to be there - it's too much of a security problem. In most SCIFs I've seen, you might have armed guards outside (we don't) but the Marine contingent is not allowed inside, or only a few of them are cleared to be in the actual SCIF itself, but they are the exception. You see stuff like that at MacDill. But what you won't see are the general base guards letting themselves into the secure areas by themselves with a key on their key ring.edit on 4-7-2012 by Bedlam because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by The X
With a compartmentalised system, someone found out of bounds of their project area, and in another project area are in danger of going missing and never being seen again.
The scientists are not stupid, when working under such stringent conditions, the transfer of documents, personnel, and other information is very closely monitored and controlled by a tiny clique of people.
Originally posted by Debunkology
taken from Raymond A. Robinson's book; 'The Alien Intent' (A Dire Warning.)
March 1982: Professor Keith Bowden, 46 --Expertise: Computer programmer and scientist at Essex University engaged in work for Marconi, who was hailed as an expert on super computers and computer-controlled aircraft. --Circumstance of Death: Fatal car crash when his vehicle went out of control across a dual carriageway and plunged onto a disused railway line. Police maintained he had been drinking but family and friends all denied the allegation. --Coroner's verdict: Accident.
Originally posted by anathema777
Thanx again!
-Anathemaedit on 7/5/2012 by anathema777 because: added info and thanx
Originally posted by XeroOne
The dates themselves might reveal something. A possibility is that one of the contractors Marconi were dealing with got breached, and some of the engineers knew about it. Who else was working there specifically between 1982 and 1990? Were any of the cases genuine suicides?
Timelines are your best friend in any investigation.edit on 5-7-2012 by XeroOne because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by XeroOne
reply to post by anathema777
Well, not so much theory as a tried and tested method. It's usually the best place to start.
Originally posted by TheIrishJihad
On most Army/Naval installations the guards on duty are usually enlisted men/women, not outside contractors. So it would then depend on their security level. I tend to think a enlisted guard would have the ok to check anything suspicious since he/she is technically on watch. At least that's how it works in most the bases I have been on.
What I meant to convey was I hadn't really thought of tracing the timeline of their "suicides" against when, where, & what projects they were working on just prior to their untimely demise. The combination of the timeline against works in progress right before their deaths & anything that they all may have had in common should make for good comparison.
Originally posted by XeroOne
@ Bedlam: Should you actually be disclosing this on a public forum? Don't want to see you get roasted.
Something tells me their projects weren't that important, but instead who they were in contact with.
It doesn't make sense to train these guys up and then assassinate them. I don't buy the "the scientists learned too much and had to be killed" thing, although there's certainly projects we've worked on where I wish the scientists HAD been killed.