It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Azdraik
First, the earth at one point used to be a much hotter place.
The temperatures that have been documented from various ice core samples have shown a warming period followed with a drastic drop in temperatures.
And the earth was inhabitable for humans then, too.
Originally posted by Reflection
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by Azdraik
First, the earth at one point used to be a much hotter place.
The temperatures that have been documented from various ice core samples have shown a warming period followed with a drastic drop in temperatures.
And the earth was inhabitable for humans then, too.
Right!
There used to be a time about 60 million years ago when volcanos were super active and there were higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, but only REPTILES could survive.
Like George Carlin said, "the planet will be fine.... We're F'd (along with most plant and animal life), but the planet will be fine!"
Originally posted by ColAngus
There will be highs and there will be lows. We're merely going through a peak right now. Records will be set like they've been in the past.
And then it will swing the other way and low records will be set a few years down the line, and hysterical, feral wolf children like the OP will claim a new Ice Age.
Originally posted by mwood
Colorado is experiencing wild fire - so what?
Florida is having flooding issues - so?
Arizona is in a drought........
Every area of the country is experiencing some type of abnormal weather but if you think ANY of the above issues are species ending events, I disagree.
Humans are very flexible and resilient and can adapt to changing weather or disasters.
Yes some will die. The sick, the weak and the ones just to stupid to adapt.
Most will prevail.
Despite the uncertainty in future climate-change impacts, it is often assumed that humans would be able to adapt to any possible warming. Here we argue that heat stress imposes a robust upper limit to such adaptation. Peak heat stress, quantified by the wetbulb temperature TW, is surprisingly similar across diverse climates today. TW never exceeds 31 °C. Any exceedence of 35 °C for extended periods should induce hyperthermia in humans and other mammals, as dissipation of metabolic heat becomes impossible. While this never happens now, it would begin to occur with global-mean warming of about 7 °C, calling the habitability of some regions into question. With 11–12 °C warming, such regions would spread to encompass the majority of the human population as currently distributed. Eventual warmings of 12 °C are possible from fossil fuel burning. One implication is that recent estimates of the costs of unmitigated climate change are too low unless the range of possible warming can somehow be narrowed. Heat stress also may help explain trends in the mammalian fossil record.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
If temperatures rise by even a fraction of what the more conservatives climate models predict, much of the earth will be uninhabitable for people.
Life (human, animal, plants) cannot survive wet-bulb temperatures of 95 degrees or more. The latest temperature increase predicted by climate scientists will exceed this.
Originally posted by mwood
Colorado is experiencing wild fire - so what?
Florida is having flooding issues - so?
Arizona is in a drought........
Every area of the country is experiencing some type of abnormal weather but if you think ANY of the above issues are species ending events, I disagree.
Humans are very flexible and resilient and can adapt to changing weather or disasters.
Yes some will die. The sick, the weak and the ones just to stupid to adapt.
Most will prevail.
Originally posted by Reflection
reply to post by stanguilles7
He has no data!
This is typical of about 99.999% of the "natural cyclists." They have minuscule data that the Sun and/or natural cycles are causing climate change compared to the massive amounts of evidence that anthropomorphic CO2 is the cause.
Not to mention all the data showing how different forms of pollution and consumption are degrading the ecosystem.
I'm sorry, but most people are simply in denial. No different than any other addict.
Originally posted by aorAki
Originally posted by Reflection
reply to post by stanguilles7
He has no data!
This is typical of about 99.999% of the "natural cyclists." They have minuscule data that the Sun and/or natural cycles are causing climate change compared to the massive amounts of evidence that anthropomorphic CO2 is the cause.
Not to mention all the data showing how different forms of pollution and consumption are degrading the ecosystem.
I'm sorry, but most people are simply in denial. No different than any other addict.
I think that humans are, to some extent, adding to climate change (anthropogenic climate change) but I am also cognisant of the EECO (Early Eocene Climatic Optimum) and the PETM (Paleocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum) amongst other 'extreme' events.
Originally posted by aorAki
Well, since said that humans are, to some extent, adding to climate change, I'm not sure what you want from me, but what you have written seems reasonable to me. I did want to point out that there are extreme records of climate change in the geologic record, from times when humans were but a twinkle in the shrew's eye...
Originally posted by earthart
Enjoy it while you can.