It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
I doubt ANYONE really knows what is in the obamacare bill. I'm willing to bet NO ONE actually read all 2000+ pages.
1) A constitutional rule that requires criminal laws to state explicitly and definitely what conduct is punishable. Criminal laws that violate this requirement are said to be void for vagueness. Vagueness doctrine rests on the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. By requiring fair notice of what is punishable and what is not, vagueness doctrine also helps prevent arbitrary enforcement of the laws. 2) Under vagueness doctrine, a statute is also void for vagueness if a legislature's delegation of authority to judges and/or administrators is so extensive that it would lead to arbitrary prosecutions. Illustrative caselaw
Originally posted by Bakatono
Originally posted by frazzle
So what would happen if on January 1st (or rather the 2nd) every employee changed their W4 to exempt status? Would that not be the first step in a genuine tax revolt?
can that be done? Just fill out a new W4 and exempt yourself? What does that mean? Does that mean no federal income tax is deducted from our pay? Does it mean no taxable income is reported to the IRS? Or, does it mean that our taxable income is reported but we paid 0 so the IRS sends their jack-booted thugs, who are now armed, to our house to collect?
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
No, I couldn't, I have absolute know knowledge of tax laws. But all it takes is a jury to find you guilty due to confirmation bias. They have and they will.
reply to post by detachedindividual
providing health care to millions of other FELLOW CITIZENS is enough to take down the government.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
I will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the presiding judge does not understand the tax code. I will assert without any fear of recourse or contradiction that none of those people sitting over there watching this trial unfold understand the tax code, and let's be honest here, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, not a single one of you understand the tax code.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by frazzle
So what would happen if on January 1st (or rather the 2nd) every employee changed their W4 to exempt status? Would that not be the first step in a genuine tax revolt?
The more prudent strategy would be to nullify the agreement between employee and employer and revoke any and all signatures contractually authorizing an employees employer to "withhold" the tax to begin with.
If that employee determines that they never were liable for any "income" tax to begin with then "exemptions" do not apply. If one is not subject to the applicable revenue law and is not liable for any tax, it stands to reason they need no exemption from that tax.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by lives
Pretty silly reason to take up arms.
Affordable healthcare? Oh no, we can't have that! But banning gay marriage, abortion and starting mindless wars? We're down!
/sarcasm
The massive corruption between the military industrial complex, bankers and government wasn't enough. The clear destruction of the freedoms of the American people with the Patriot Act wasn't enough. But according to many of the idiotic and ignorant right, providing health care to millions of other FELLOW CITIZENS is enough to take down the government
Good luck trying that one in court.
Regardless of how you feel about taxation or our court system, directly insulting the entire courtroom (including the judge) is a great way to land yourself in the slammer.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by lives
Pretty silly reason to take up arms.
Affordable healthcare? Oh no, we can't have that! But banning gay marriage, abortion and starting mindless wars? We're down!
/sarcasm
Originally posted by GunzCoty
reply to post by detachedindividual
providing health care to millions of other FELLOW CITIZENS is enough to take down the government.
How does taxing people who can't afford healthcare providing it to millions?
Please explain that to me.
I will admit I did not read all 3,000+ pages
Do you some how believe that this new law will give you free healthcare?
For form and contents of such certificates, see 31.3402(f)(5)1. The employer is required to request a withholding exemption certificate from each employee, but if the employee fails to furnish such certificate, such employee shall be considered as a single person claiming no withholding exemptions.
Most of the fools who applaud this assault of freedom do actually believe this gives everyone free health care. They are blinded by political ideology and can't actually see what is happening.
However, I bet they will be whining about it when the opposite political party is in power and begins to compel them to do something while giving it a rosy title.
As this graphic shows, the new law creates 68 grant programs, 47 bureaucratic entities, 29 demonstration or pilot programs, 6 regulatory systems, 6 compliance standards and 2 entitlements. What could possibly go wrong with something so-well organized?
The only thing an employer is required to do is make the request. If a signature on a Form W4 is not forthcoming from any employee, that employer is then instructed to mark that employee a single person claiming no withholding exemptions.
In the United States
Local Currency was common in this country during the Depression when banks failed and many communities decided to create their own currencies as a way of increasing the local money supply and supporting local businesses and residents. Over 300 cities and thousands of communities and organizations issued emergency currency.
Well, dammit Jean Paul, you just give us no choice but to create our own money systems and start up our own businesses.
Wow, I had no idea it was that bad.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by frazzle
Well, dammit Jean Paul, you just give us no choice but to create our own money systems and start up our own businesses.
I have long argued that this is what many of us should do, just start our own business, but you certainly do have a choice, and as I showed, as an employee you are under no legal compulsion to sign any Form W4 and your employer has no legal compulsion to demand you do.
Originally posted by GunzCoty
reply to post by detachedindividual
providing health care to millions of other FELLOW CITIZENS is enough to take down the government.
How does taxing people who can't afford healthcare providing it to millions?
Please explain that to me.
I will admit I did not read all 3,000+ pages
Do you some how believe that this new law will give you free healthcare?