It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vespasian
reply to post by aaaiii
I think that disciples counted themselves friends of Jesus. They didn't see the bigger picture. Paul (Saul) was the most vociferous follower and he never met Jesus properly. He saw the reason Jesus came and died for us.
The disciples were ordinary men frightened of the Roman Rule....Eventually Peter did Jesus bidding and was martyred for it.
I think they wrote things down but kept them secret, The later Christians used the writings and stories to write what we now know as The New Testament.
Originally posted by aaaiii
As believer in the man, Christ, I have often wondered why his faithful waited 100 years or more to record an historical record of his life.
If he was such an important figure, performed miracles, spoke profoundly on life, was the son of God, why was there such a long period of time between his death and the actual record of his history?
If he was such an important figure why did his disciples not record everything he said and did while he was alive?
Was he possibly made into a more important figure ex post facto to suit the needs of a burgeoning Church?
Originally posted by darke_raven
reply to post by aaaiii
see the thread all roads lead to rome... www.abovetopsecret.com...
christ was a myth invented by power hungry romans to create a more profitable system.
That is one way to conceptualize God, but not one that has to be adopted based on the Bible as I see it.
If their god created trillions of galaxies, is capable of knowing every atom, can communicate instantly with every being, can alter the thought of all beings, then why the need to send his son to change the earth which is by the way insignificant on the cosmic scale?
Originally posted by WalterRatlos
Well, all religions are delusional to a point, in that they are based on myths and mythology. The sect of Christianity arose from the messianic, eschatological beliefs of the Jews, namely that one from the line of David would arise and deliver them from bondage (first the Babylonians then the Greeks then the Romans). In fact, between Augustus' death and the destruction of Jerusalem in the year 70 AD thereabouts, there were quite a few Jews who tried to convince their brethren that they were in fact the awaited Messiah. That is why Matthew and Luke both list all of the line of the house of David. Strangely enough, however, the line is traced through Joseph who was not involved in siring Jesus, if you believe the same gospels. I'm not sure whether Paul was the founder of that sect or whether he was a Trojan horse maybe or what his role was specifically. It's interesting that his name was Saul first, like the mythical first king of Israel and David's
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by pro-all
That is one way to conceptualize God, but not one that has to be adopted based on the Bible as I see it.
If their god created trillions of galaxies, is capable of knowing every atom, can communicate instantly with every being, can alter the thought of all beings, then why the need to send his son to change the earth which is by the way insignificant on the cosmic scale?
The universe could have been planned to exist as a virtual living physical organism that once created, could function on its own by built-in cosmic laws.
The unified infinite mind that formed that plan could have, once the universe came into being, became a vast multitude of celestial beings to spread amongst it. Also included in that throng of entities would be ourselves, human beings who chose to have an existence within the universe, as being of a makeup that combined the physical with the spiritual. Those who chose to be powerful spiritual beings would find a world to watch over and to help and to be their God.
Originally posted by aaaiii
As believer in the man, Christ, I have often wondered why his faithful waited 100 years or more to record an historical record of his life.
If he was such an important figure, performed miracles, spoke profoundly on life, was the son of God, why was there such a long period of time between his death and the actual record of his history?
If he was such an important figure why did his disciples not record everything he said and did while he was alive?
Was he possibly made into a more important figure ex post facto to suit the needs of a burgeoning Church?
Originally posted by aaaiii
I'll reiterate what I posted earlier in the thread. This is NOT a discussion about whether or not Christ existed.
For the purpose, of this thread, Christ the man existed.
The subject of the thread is ~ Why the Delay in Recording Christ's History?