It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kang69
reply to post by waypastvne
Not really. All the video shows is charges going off before the building collapses, and thus the building collapses... I noticed that on youtube. 9/11 shill videos about plane holograms and ufo's bombing the towers. It's simple actually, you put a few charges on the buildings columns and it falls like a sack of bricks. Nothing else to it.
Originally posted by LoonyConservative
Your right, this IS beating a dead horse.
Where is all the oil imports from Iraq? years later why are gas prices so high? You take a theory on WTC7 and turn it into Cheney bashing.
So no the evidence is not in my face.. if you look at the debris field WTC7 was covered in it, and was damaged . oh and some of that debris was on fire.. seems to me that the logical thing to do would be indeed to "pull it" instead of wasting more and more resources on a building that cant be saved, when those same resources could be used to help injured people etc.
There was nothing for Larry to gain by bringing 7 down... the lease for the WTC complex was for 1, 2, 4 and 5... Larry was involved with WTC 7 in that his company was the one that built it. but at the time of 2001 he only owned the leases to 1 2 4 and 5edit on 20-6-2012 by LoonyConservative because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kang69
reply to post by Atlantien
Are you talking about the Fire fighters? To take a building like that down it requires precision, weeks if not months of preparation. People couldn't just hop in there and plant some charges and expect it go well.
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by Kang69
reply to post by Atlantien
Are you talking about the Fire fighters? To take a building like that down it requires precision, weeks if not months of preparation. People couldn't just hop in there and plant some charges and expect it go well.
Yes they could have done it. Two weeks before 9/11 all of the bomb sniffing dogs were pulled from the towers and seeing how maintenance was going on constantly explosives could have been easily planted.
Originally posted by Kang69
reply to post by Mianeye
Faked it? I guess he could add the flashes and the sounds but it still doesn't add up. Every WTC 7 video there are these black spots on specific floors in the building that appear before the building collapses. Now at first you would think that would be caused from the air pressure shooting out the windows, but it can't obliviously because the building has not fallen yet.
That would mean every wtc7 video has to be faked. You can't ignore these explosions that you can obliviously see before the building collapses, nothing else would cause those.
Originally posted by Kang69
reply to post by buster2010
That's exactly what I mean. He was basically saying the fire fighters just hoped in there and planted it.
Originally posted by Kang69
reply to post by waypastvne
From your posts your obliviously a disinfo agent (congratulations) None the less, trying to derail a thread by saying theres ufo's in the videos is working against you. You should try to talk about the subject at hand if you truly want to do your job.
Originally posted by Kang69
reply to post by homervb
Great video. I don't think the fire department had anything to do with it. Preparation for taking down a building takes time, especially putting a building down in it's own footprint in 9 seconds flat. When you really get down to it, FBI rigged all the buildings in advance, so Halliburton could make a buck or two.
Or Satanical Zionists that are bent on World Domination. That part is still unclear to me.
www.cbsnews.com...
Report: CIA Lost Office In WTC
A secret office operated by the CIA was destroyed in the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, seriously disrupting intelligence operations.
The undercover station was in 7 World Trade Center, a smaller office tower that fell several hours after the collapse of the twin towers on Sept. 11, a U.S. government official said.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that immediately after the attack, a special CIA team scoured the rubble in search of secret documents and intelligence reports stored in the station, either on paper or in computers. It was not known whether the efforts were successful.
A CIA spokesman declined to comment on the existence of the office, which was first reported in Sunday's editions of The New York Times.
The New York station was behind the false front of another federal organization, which the Times did not identify. The station was a base of operations to spy on and recruit foreign diplomats stationed at the United Nations, while debriefing selected American business executives and others willing to talk to the CIA after returning from overseas.
The agency's officers in New York often work undercover, posing as diplomats and business executives, among other things. They have been deeply involved in counter-terrorism efforts in the New York area, working jointly with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other agencies.
The CIA's main New York office was unaffected by the attacks, but agents have been sharing space at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations, and have borrowed other federal government offices in the city.
The agency is prohibited from conducting domestic espionage operations against Americans, but it maintains stations in a number of major United States cities, where CIA case officers try to meet and recruit students and other foreigners to return to their countries and spy for the United States.
The New York station was believed to have been the largest and most important CIA domestic station outside the Washington area.
Originally posted by Kang69
reply to post by waypastvne
As the building deforms? Deforms from what? Falling? The windows broke before the building "deformed". And if you can send me a video of a skyscraper falling due to a fire, I'll rest my case.