Why I Doubt the Official "Story"

Originally posted by plube
reply to post by Reheat

 

Right and this is from Randi Forums....awesome research....fantastic...I will run right over to Randi's forums..and sign up.....OH right i am already a member there....on the most OS biased website out there.....that is the most reliable source a person could ever quote.

Yeah, goodolrandi, the den of disinfo, the first stop for anyone wanting to train as a jedi shill!

reply to post by kidtwist


Umm, no, they didnt want to admit there was a lot of incompetence that day. Thats why they fought so hard against having a Commission in the first place. For crying out loud, it wasnt until several years afterwards that we found out the "state of the art" communications systems on Air Force One, were SOOOO great that the President was out of contact half of the time he was flying around. They landed in Omaha, so he could have reliable frigging comm lines with his staff.

Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by phishyblankwaters

 

Think about that before I respond. Ok. Thought about it. The FBI alone damn near spent the same amount of money investigating 9/11 as was spent looking into Monica/Whitewater. That doesn't include the actual Commission, the CIA, NSA, NYPD, PAPD, NIST etc....

So you were told by these 'officials' you keep believing. I would say, by the job they did on their investigations that someone pocketed a lot of cash because it sure was not spent on a thorough investigation!

Originally posted by 911files

Originally posted by SimontheMagusI can hardly wait for the OS troops to respond.....

I'm not an OS troop, but those are NOT Wall Street articles. They are press releases from truther organizations.

It appears you do not know enough about 9/11 to know that the term 'truther' is a deliberate term created by the people who did 9/11! It's fictional.

What did you actually think a 'truther' was?!

Originally posted by 911files

Originally posted by maxella1The pentagon had drills with the same scenario of civilian jets used as weapons and crash into the pentagon and WTC two years before 9/11.

I would like to see a reference on this. The only "drills" I am familiar with are those associated with crashes (not "civilian jets used as weapons"). As a matter of fact, one of the firefighters from the Pentagon was in training for such a crash when the plane hit the Pentagon. They did a lot planning at the Pentagon for this sort of thing because of the proximity of Reagan National. Especially after the Jet Blue crash in 1982 which came pretty darn close. I would imagine that the WTC had similar drills and exercises due to their height.

edit on 18-6-2012 by 911files because: (no reason given)

edit on 18-6-2012 by 911files because: (no reason given)

Hey maxella, there is a new recruit in the house, I think this one has not read the all training manual yet, I'm sure 911files will get the hang of it after maybe 3,4,5, or 6 years, like some of his fellow manual readers!

Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by kidtwist

 

You do not begin to understand terrorism. Attacking a military base or a government building does not get near the reaction that attacking a civilan target gets.

I know how terrorism works dear chap, if you care to pop your spectacles on, and have a closer read, I said that the president or world leaders would be a primary target, and civilians a secondary target.

They (hijackers) supposedly planned the attacks on civilians, and also on government buildings. They hit civilians first, and this should have meant the military would detect they were under attack, and prevent further attacks, which would then make hitting the pentagon/whitehouse much more difficult.

If the pentagon was hit first this would have ensured a definite hit on the government, and these are the main people they are against. By attacking the pentagon later it would decrease their chances of getting close to it.

The 'hijackers' must have had inside knowledge that war games was going on, they must have know, like everyone else, that Andrews AFB had 2 jets stationed there to protect the whitehouse/pentagon, just 10 miles away, and these were positioned there prior to 9/11 after a small plane landed at the pentagon.

So they must (hijackers) have known the defences they were up against, and must have had inside knowledge to plan their attack with such precision to ensure they got that pentagon strike in.

Originally posted by kidtwistt appears you do not know enough about 9/11 to know that the term 'truther' is a deliberate term created by the people who did 9/11! It's fictional.

What did you actually think a 'truther' was?!

Oh, so now those of us started independent research into the events of 9/11 all those years ago are those who did 9/11

Seek help, really.

Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by kidtwist

 

Umm, no, they didnt want to admit there was a lot of incompetence that day. Thats why they fought so hard against having a Commission in the first place. For crying out loud, it wasnt until several years afterwards that we found out the "state of the art" communications systems on Air Force One, were SOOOO great that the President was out of contact half of the time he was flying around. They landed in Omaha, so he could have reliable frigging comm lines with his staff.

Why are you crying out loud? Is all the years selling your personal views on 9/11 making you stressed to the point of tears?! I'd give 9/11 forums a bit of a rest ol' chap, it seems like all those years embroiled in the OS has made you a bit jumpy. It seems the 'crying out loud comment' you made indicates you are internally stressed, and the 'frigging' comment makes you seem angry. Are you ok viper? Maybe step away from the tv for a while, I've heard it can make you behave like this, that is why I keep away from the tv, I don't want that junk messing with my mind!

They sent a man to the moon way back, they had comms on the moon dude, yeah, that's right, your boys had comms on the moon! If they can do that all that time ago, I reckon they could get comms on the President's plane! They even managed to get a signal on the 'hijacked' planes, so the hijacked passengers could call their loved ones!

Originally posted by 911files

Originally posted by kidtwistt appears you do not know enough about 9/11 to know that the term 'truther' is a deliberate term created by the people who did 9/11! It's fictional.

What did you actually think a 'truther' was?!

Oh, so now those of us started independent research into the events of 9/11 all those years ago are those who did 9/11

Seek help, really.

Why are you even on a 9/11 forum and you do not even understand what 'truther' means! I know this is embarrassing for you but be dignified and hold your hands like a man when you make a mistake!

I can tell by your comments that you view those that do not believe the OS as 'truthers', you have stated this already in this thread, you have called people 'truthers' whilst upholding the OS.

The real people seeking the truth are genuine researchers, who are not truthers, do not call themselves such, and never will call themselves such, because the term 'truther' as all 9/11 researchers know, is a ficticious term created by the American government to stereotype and ridicule anyone who does not follow their fairytale OS story.

There are many 'truther' sites set up deliberately by the perps to discredit people seeking the 'real' truth, and there is cointelpro all over the internet trying to suppress the real truth behind 9/11, and using the 'term' truther against people who disbelieve the OS is a common tactic by cointelpro people.

So perhaps do some proper research, and check out your own health before you start firing that rubbish out of your qwerty gun.

Originally posted by kidtwist
Why are you even on a 9/11 forum and you do not even understand what 'truther' means! I know this is embarrassing for you but be dignified and hold your hands like a man when you make a mistake!

I can tell by your comments that you view those that do not believe the OS as 'truthers', you have stated this already in this thread, you have called people 'truthers' whilst upholding the OS.

The real people seeking the truth are genuine researchers, who are not truthers, do not call themselves such, and never will call themselves such, because the term 'truther' as all 9/11 researchers know, is a ficticious term created by the American government to stereotype and ridicule anyone who does not follow their fairytale OS story.

There are many 'truther' sites set up deliberately by the perps to discredit people seeking the 'real' truth, and there is cointelpro all over the internet trying to suppress the real truth behind 9/11, and using the 'term' truther against people who disbelieve the OS is a common tactic by cointelpro people.

So perhaps do some proper research, and check out your own health before you start firing that rubbish out of your qwerty gun.

You see, that is the problem. You write that and it seems rational to you. Must be nice living in a world of paranoia and delusion.

reply to post by kidtwist


And your posts continue to show just how little you know about the subject old chap. Have a good evening