It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 001ggg100
First you need to prove that this jesus fellow existed to begin with... And refrain from using the bible as that book is completely unreliable....
Seriously people, what difference does it make what the skin, eye, hair color was of your imaginary god?
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Screw it.
"Their visage is blacker than a coal; they are not known in the streets: their skin cleaveth to their bones; it is withered, it is become like a stick." Lamentations 4:8
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Do you think Jesus cares what race people view him as?
Originally posted by shaluach
Originally posted by Azadok2day
reply to post by shaluach
TextAlready answered. Skin color is not important; historical fact is. It's a fact that He was Black. And again it's irrelevant when him being Black is brought up. You don't argue how unimportant it is for the people claiming he was White.
Jews are Caucasian , no ifs and or buts . The fact some people try to paint a different picture for racial reasons is ignorant at best , we try to deny that here .
What exactly are you saying that modern Jews bleached themselves because why? Or are you saying modern Jews are not Jews at all ? And every Jew today is a fake ? All historians are liars ?
Sow me in scripture were God has written that his chosen people are dark skinned ? And don't try to peg me as a racist I have black friends and some were my best of best friends in the service .
Modern Jews are. Ancient Hebrews were not and that's evidenced in Scripture and history. So, yes there are "ifs, ands, or buts." It is ignorant to claim that he was Caucasian.
Originally posted by shaluach
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by shaluach
Question: Are you yourself darker skinned?
Also, as blasphemous as this may sound, Jesus was probably half Roman, which could easily have resulted in him being more fair both in terms of skin and hair.
edit on 13-6-2012 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)
1. No, I am not. I am Irish, Greek, and Cuban. That is completely irrelevant, though. Of course I know why you were asking. Your question was going to lead to an ad hominem. If I was "dark skinned" (i.e. Black) then that must be why I'm promoting a Black Jesus, because White people can't promote a Black Jesus which is patently absurd.
2. He was not "probably" half-Roman.
Originally posted by Oldtimer2
reply to post by shaluach
All the jewish people I know are white,blond hair blue eyes,some have afro like hair,Jesus was Jewish,had he been black would have been referred to as a moor,some peole wil try anything to justify their off beat rant,give it up dude,you can twist words but the facts remain
Originally posted by shaluach
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by shaluach
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Viking9019
My Q is..
What the Hell does it matter??? How does His skin color change anyone's salvation??
No one said it does. For someone who doesn't care about this subject you sure are on this thread a lot. If you don't care then why are you here? Oh, that's right. I forgot. You always need to be the center of attention
Im wondering why YOU care about skin color. Why is skin color important to you? Can we argue next if the nails were steel or iron? If the wood the cross was made from was cherry or birch? What other irrelevant bits of info can we argue about next??
Already answered. Skin color is not important; historical fact is. It's a fact that He was Black. And again it's irrelevant when him being Black is brought up. You don't argue how unimportant it is for the people claiming he was White.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Do you think Jesus cares what race people view him as?