It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Agarta
Did you actually read the article in the first link you provided or did you purposely leave this info out to spark controversy?
Originally posted by lacrimaererum
www.azcentral.com... ngnews
was he armed? or was he just shouting and screaming ?
From the article.....so yah he was armed and he charged them
Sgt. Trent Crump said a man who showed up with his 4-year-old child for swim lessons saw the young man in the parking lot with a baseball bat acting "high" and "behaving erratically," including threatening a child. The man called 911. Independently, park staff also called 911 on the man for reportedly striking a stick or bat against the building.
Two responding police officers contacted the man and at some point, he charged the officers, Crump said. Each officer fired two to three rounds, Crump said.
edit on 4-6-2012 by Agarta because: (no reason given)
Whatever happened to using whatever means necessary to detain someone without using deadly force?
Its just unfortunate that American Citizens have been brainwashed into believing that this is the normal and expected reaction if you step out of lin today. Execution is the automatic response.
Let that sink in. Execution.
Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by Juggernog
Probably just trying to live until retirement.
A worthy goal...
American units fighting Moro guerrillas during the Philippine-American War using the then-standard Colt M1892 revolver, in .38 Long Colt, found it to be unsuitable for the rigors of jungle warfare, particularly in terms of stopping power, as the Moros had very high battle morale and frequently used drugs to inhibit the sensation of pain.[7] The U.S. Army briefly reverted to using the M1873 single-action revolver in .45 Colt caliber, which had been standard during the late 19th century; the heavier bullet was found to be more effective against charging tribesmen.[8] The problems prompted the then-Chief of Ordnance, General William Crozier, to authorize further testing for a new service pistol.[8]