It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stupid girl
All I know for a fact is that:
1. There is no Epistle of Barnabas in the Orthodox Bible nor the Amplified Bible nor the Messianic Jewish Bible, therefore I feel comfortable concluding that there is a well-founded reason for that.
2. Barnabas worked with Paul in establishing the Christian faith among Gentiles, however it was hard for them to get along much of the time. I probably wouldn't have gotten along with Paul either, just sayin'.
3. Barnabas was flayed. Meaning, the man's entire body was DE-SKINNED ALIVE for his faith in Christ.
Therefore, I feel comfortable concluding that any "Lost Translation/Epistle of Barnabas" that records him as not believing in Christ is FAIL. And any Islamic version of a Christian text denying Christ & promulgating a child molester & puppy killer is CLOSSAL FAIL.
And anything about Christianity that comes from the Land of Ahmadinetard is.....well, let me just give you a visual on that one:
But yet meteorites have hit the earth in the past and caused mass extintions? 1000s times worse than man could ever achieve how does that work, or are you going to say that was gods will? Why would he get so pissed about the world being destroyed but he does it himself, quiet often actualy, you could say it was a hobby even......
Originally posted by Jordan River
5th 6th century, well thats not suspicious
Originally posted by redneck13
Originally posted by Jordan River
5th 6th century, well thats not suspicious
Amalekites
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
That doesn't answer the question about carbon. Where did God say anything about carbon? When did God forbid the use of carbon?
Why carbon and not atomic energy? Why carbon but not stem cell research?
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
That doesn't answer the question about carbon. Where did God say anything about carbon? When did God forbid the use of carbon?
Why carbon and not atomic energy? Why carbon but not stem cell research?
He doesn't say anything about carbon at all. EwR believes carbon has something to do with the Mark of the Beast but scripturally carbon has nothing to do with the Mark of the Beast.
From the research i have been gathering the MotB is the system based on the arts of usury the Israelites/jews learned from the Mystery Babylon religions they fell into which breaks every commandment in the decalogue (which is why El Elyon sent them on the Diaspora). In prophetic language Beasts are empires and the mark of a Beast is it's currency which effects your ability to buy and sell within that Beast, if you do not have said "marks" you starve to death or cannot get proper medical attention, now these so called biometric chip implants can come into play at a later time once the system has been completely converted into and electronic/digital cashless system, which is already in the works with debit cards and how more and more businesses are increasingly refusing to accept checks as legal tender.
The MotB will be tied into this:
666 is the number of betrayal, the number of a man...it's King Solomon's number of talents he recieved in a year as tribute. The Seal of Solomon is the hexagram, the very same symbol Zionists proclaim as the "Star of David" but had nothing to do with David at all. It's the mark of Molech whom Solomon sacrificed children to for fortune and wealth after he built an altar to Molech for one of his pagan wives. Molech has different names he goes by, probably Shikuuth or Kiyuun the gods of some other Mystery Babylon religion.
This is also the same symbol Rothchild adopted and where the Israel Zionists got it from and is also the symbol of the Merovingian Dynasty who claim to be the decendants of Yeshua (yet amazingly enough they ignore his teachings).
Amos 5: 26-27
26 You also carried Sikkuth your king
And Chiun, your idols,
The star of your gods,
Which you made for yourselves.
27 Therefore I will send you into captivity beyond Damascus,”
Says the Lord, whose name is the God of hosts.
What is the only "star" the jews have ever claimed even before Solomon? What symbol did he have on the ring he used to control demons with? Only one symbol...this:
I'm not opposed to Israel being ruled by jews but they are going about it the wrong way and they should have nothing to do with this symbol at all. Within this symbol is imbedded the number 666, also the number of Solomon. The inner hexagon has 6 sides, the outer star points has 6 points and the angles of the 2 overlapping triangles has 60 degree angles to each triangle all totalling the number 666. Where there's smoke, there's fire.edit on 24-5-2012 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)
“Several of the expressions written in the gospel are ones Europeans borrowed from Arab sources,” he wrote.
This gospel, he explained, contains several mistakes that can be obvious to Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike.
According to many studies, the gospel attributed to St. Barnabas was written by a European Jew in the Middle Ages who was quite familiar with the Quran and the Gospels. He, thus, mixed facts from here and there and his intentions remain unknown.
This work should not be confused with the surviving Epistle of Barnabas, nor with the surviving Acts of Barnabas.
The name Shalmaneser is used for him in the Bible, which attributes to him and his father the deportation of the "Ten Lost Tribes" of Israel. In the 17th and 18th chapters of 2 Kings he is described as the conqueror of Samaria and as sending its inhabitants into exile
Julian thought to rebuild at an extravagant expense the proud Temple once at Jerusalem, and committed this task to Alypius of Antioch. Alypius set vigorously to work, and was seconded by the governor of the province; when fearful balls of fire, breaking out near the foundations, continued their attacks, till the workmen, after repeated scorchings, could approach no more: and he gave up the attempt
Furthermore Muhammad isn't even prophecied anywhere in the bible
Text
Deceptive God, Incompetent Messiah
What Islam Really Teaches About Allah and Jesus
Muslims boast about their reverence for God and their respect for the prophets. Yet, upon closer examination, we see that Islam accuses God of one of the greatest religious deceptions ever. This should cause us to pause and think for a moment. Why would a religion that prides itself on its view of God proclaim that God starts false religions? Why would people who claim to respect Jesus suggest that he was a tremendous failure? It appears that Islam is so incredibly desperate to destroy Christianity, that it doesn’t mind destroying itself. In other words, Islam can only explain away Jesus’ death and resurrection by making God out to be a deceiver, which destroys the Islamic conception of God. This desperation only makes sense if Christianity is true, and if Islam was designed by Satan to keep people from being saved.
Muslims can object to this all they want. They can continue to proclaim their devotion to God and their respect for his prophets. But there’s something strange about the way they explain Christianity. There’s something very odd about a God who leads the world astray. If Islam is true, God and Jesus are failures. But if Christianity is true, God and Jesus were victorious at the cross, for the door to salvation was opened to all, in spite of those who tried to keep the door shut.
Jesus warned his followers that false prophets would come. He also commanded us not to believe them. One of the ways we can spot false prophets is by carefully discerning when their teachings lead to unacceptable beliefs about God. God is Truth, and he is Love. Islam, when carefully examined, would have us believe otherwise.