It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
WTF! How can I defend myself from things you invent????edit on 24-5-2012 by MI5edtoDeath because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jazzguy
guys we have a much bigger problem at hand then the wtc7..
the OPs avatar. seriously scares the crap out of me.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
WTF! How can I defend myself from things you invent????edit on 24-5-2012 by MI5edtoDeath because: (no reason given)
How can he engage in a productive debate with you when you lie about what you've claimed?
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
I simply disagreed that all the smoke was from Building 7 when building 5 and 6 were burning like torches.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
I simply disagreed that all the smoke was from Building 7 when building 5 and 6 were burning like torches.
You didn't actually. But I'm beginning to see what your MO is and I'm not particularly surprised.
Originally posted by 4hero
Nice post MI5.
We are supposed to believe that debris causes fires!
Eye witness Barry Jennings talking about explosions in WTC7
I've got a good picture showing minimal debris damage, I'll dig it out tomorrow.
BTW, OP, ignore the shills from now on, dont waste your time responding to them no matter what they say. Just answer the genuine unhostile members. The shills are full of crap anyway. They're only trying to sell a lie!
Keep up the good word MI5.
Please note the location of Building 7. It is separated from WTC 1 by two buildings, WTC 5 and 6.
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by MI5edtoDeath
Please note the location of Building 7. It is separated from WTC 1 by two buildings, WTC 5 and 6.
WTC 5 and 6 - 9 stories (WTC 5) , 8 story (WTC 6)
WTC 1 is 110 story
WTC 7 is 47 story
So you are saying the debris from collapse of WTC 1 can not reach WTC 7 because of WTC 5/6....?
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by MI5edtoDeath
So what direction is the smoke travelling.......?
Clip 7 - smoke from fires on south side of WTC 7
www.911myths.com...
Clip 11 - multiple floors fully involved on north side WTC 7
www.911myths.com...
Care to enlighten us further concerning the fires......
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by 4hero
It was already worked out years ago that Barry Jennings didn't look through a single window until both towers collapsed. The "explosion" in the stairwell was Tower 1 impacting the building he was in, Building 7.
Originally posted by ajay59
Notice the dedication that the "OSer's" bring to the table? They almost seem desperate to convince everyone that the "official" story is the correct one! Are bonuses on the line?
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by MI5edtoDeath
I was laughing at your comment that the smoke from Building 7 was from 5. You have to be joking with everyone to possibly act like you believe Building 7 wasn't producing that smoke. I provided pictures for proof.
What is it with you OSers chasing us concerned citizens while we chase the truth.
You "official story freaks" are focused on us because we are focused on 9/11.
You said, "...act like you believe Building 7 wasn't producing that smoke."
WTF! How can I defend myself from things you invent????edit on 24-5-2012 by MI5edtoDeath because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ajay59
Notice the dedication that the "OSer's" bring to the table? They almost seem desperate to convince everyone that the "official" story is the correct one! Are bonuses on the line?
911 After 10 years all they have are Youtube videos and speculation.
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
The Building 7 with localised fires breaking out.
Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall. A controlled demolition would have minimized the damage caused by the building’s imminent collapse and potentially save lives. Many law enforcement personnel, firefighters and other journalists were aware of this possible option. There was no secret. There was no conspiracy. Read more: www.foxnews.com...