WTC7, the smoking gun that just will not go away until the traitors are rounded up

Please note the location of Building 7. It is separated from WTC 1 by two buildings, WTC 5 and 6.



The Building 7 with localised fires breaking out.



Localised fires



Aerial view of Building 7 with other buildings still standing all around it, even the badly damaged and "scoop-out" Building 6 is still standing.



Note Building 7 (east elevation) to the right and to the back ground, the severally burning Building 5. It never collapsed despite the flames and the debris from WTC1. How come its trusses never "sagged".

reply to post by MI5edtoDeath


WTC7 was without a doubt imploded....no other explanation makes any sense whatsoever. Hopefully the people behind 911 will be brought to justice soon...hopefully.

p.s. Your avatar really freaks me out!!

Originally posted by KibbleChild
reply to post by MI5edtoDeath

 

WTC7 was without a doubt imploded....no other explanation makes any sense whatsoever. Hopefully the people behind 911 will be brought to justice soon...hopefully.

p.s. Your avatar really freaks me out!!

If WTC 7 was imploded, then questions have to be asked about WTCs 1 and 2.

Glad you like my avatar. Thanks.

yea, and i saw that one picture.....localized fires.....
could be where the briefcase was right before some kind boom happened

reply to post by MI5edtoDeath


You forgot to show the south side, belching smoke from top to bottom. I wonder why ?


www.youtube.com...

Here's the owner Larry Silverstein saying "pull it"

www.youtube.com...

We all know it was demolished, nothing is going to come of this...

Originally posted by GBP/JPY
yea, and i saw that one picture.....localized fires.....
could be where the briefcase was right before some kind boom happened

The fires seemed to have in the lower floors where the government offices were located. Perhaps settling alight all those filing cabinets brought the building down.

Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by MI5edtoDeath

 

You forgot to show the south side, belching smoke from top to bottom. I wonder why ?


www.youtube.com...

You wonder why? Pray tell why you suspect me of a nefarious deeds when you swallowed the official story hook, line and sinker?

Your video shows the side facing the post office building. The video was taken from a point nearly behind the post office building of a side of Building 7 furtherest away from WCT1.

Your "belching smoke" is probably an updraft from the burning building 5. Do you see the photo of Building 5?

Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath

Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by MI5edtoDeath

 

You forgot to show the south side, belching smoke from top to bottom. I wonder why ?


www.youtube.com...

You wonder why? Pray tell why you suspect me of a nefarious deed when you swallowed the official story hook, line and sinker?

Your video shows the side facing the post office building. The video was taken from a point nearly behind the post office building of a side of Building 7 furtherest away from WCT1.

Your "belching smoke" is probably an updraft from the burning building 5. Do you see the photo of Building 5?

edit on 23-5-2012 by MI5edtoDeath because: (no reason given)

Of course it is ! When is your next appointment with specsavers ?

reply to post by Alfie1

Of course it is ! When is your next appointment with specsavers ?

Reductio ad absurdum

Trust an "Official Story" (OSer) to take it to the gutter.

Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
Your "belching smoke" is probably an updraft from the burning building 5. Do you see the photo of Building 5

Hahahaha! Hahahahaha!

You really believe that?! Oh, well, that was a chuckle for sure.







This evidence enough that the building was burning all over the South side and had damage?

reply to post by Varemia


You said,

Hahahaha! Hahahahaha!

You really believe that?! Oh, well, that was a chuckle for sure.

Is this your attempt at ridicule?

The FEMA report said the lower south facing elevation was cantilevered and that there were lift cores at the centre of the building with trusses connecting the area.

So what if the facade was damaged? They are not load bearing and the building was held up by the cores and trusses.

reply to post by MI5edtoDeath


So, have you got that data on the nist model of WTC7 THAT YOU PROMISED US?

Its a bit disappointing to see you start a WTC7 thread without including any reference to this new evidence.

reply to post by MI5edtoDeath


I was laughing at your comment that the smoke from Building 7 was from 5. You have to be joking with everyone to possibly act like you believe Building 7 wasn't producing that smoke. I provided pictures for proof.

Nice post MI5.

We are supposed to believe that debris causes fires!

Eye witness Barry Jennings talking about explosions in WTC7



I've got a good picture showing minimal debris damage, I'll dig it out tomorrow.

BTW, OP, ignore the shills from now on, dont waste your time responding to them no matter what they say. Just answer the genuine unhostile members. The shills are full of crap anyway. They're only trying to sell a lie!

Keep up the good word MI5.

reply to post by 4hero


It was already worked out years ago that Barry Jennings didn't look through a single window until both towers collapsed. The "explosion" in the stairwell was Tower 1 impacting the building he was in, Building 7. This is backed up by his companion's testimony, who was much better at describing the outside.

Jennings thought that the firefighters coming and going were the collapses of the towers, but he described nothing that was synonymous with the collapses. The reason is that the window he opened was on the North side, facing away from the Towers' previous location.

The fact that this has to continuously be told to you guys is revealing. I mean, come on! If you can't even remember that for even a couple months, how can anyone take you seriously?

I'll add a little more about Barry Jennings, he was inside WTC7, and there were explosions inside WTC7 whilst he was still in there, hence why him and his colleague were trapped inside for a good while.

guys we have a much bigger problem at hand then the wtc7..

the OPs avatar. seriously scares the crap out of me.

Building 7 was demolished, pure and simple, end of discussion.

I can't believe this is still debatable. People who think that building could have collapsed the way it did because of the fires it had shouldn't even be acknowledged with responses.

Sorry if this attitude is contrary to the essence of a discussion forum, but it's ridiculous. Open your eyes.

Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by MI5edtoDeath

 

I was laughing at your comment that the smoke from Building 7 was from 5. You have to be joking with everyone to possibly act like you believe Building 7 wasn't producing that smoke. I provided pictures for proof.

What is it with you OSers chasing us concerned citizens while we chase the truth.

You "official story freaks" are focused on us because we are focused on 9/11.

You said, "...act like you believe Building 7 wasn't producing that smoke."

WTF! How can I defend myself from things you invent????