It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Misoir
But like some other group of fanatics I can think of, they sincerely believe everyone else agrees with their cause or are “ignorant”.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
reply to post by jibeho
As soon as I saw "anarchist and communist protesters." all credibility in the post was shot to hell.
I find it quite funny that biased sources are used so readily, even when they expose their bias in the words shared
Being anti-NATO does not automatically mean "anarchist and communist". To suggest so is mind-numbingly idiotic.
Deny ignorance, indeed.
Originally posted by michaelbrux
the protesters detest violence and say it is not the way to resolve conflicts.
then they elaborate and explain that they are speaking only of physical violence as bad and that emotional and mental violence are legitimate forms of violence; coincidentally, those are the forms of violence they will employ.
www.chicagotribune.com... 77262.story
i'm just happy that they revealed this about themselves at the beginning of their performance.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
reply to post by jibeho
As soon as I saw "anarchist and communist protesters." all credibility in the post was shot to hell.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by michaelbrux
the protesters detest violence and say it is not the way to resolve conflicts.
then they elaborate and explain that they are speaking only of physical violence as bad and that emotional and mental violence are legitimate forms of violence; coincidentally, those are the forms of violence they will employ.
www.chicagotribune.com... 77262.story
i'm just happy that they revealed this about themselves at the beginning of their performance.
You seem to like making sweeping generalizations about ALL protesters.
So in your opinion, all protesters are anarchists and violent? They should all be ignored, or should they be stripped of their RIGHT to protest?
I do not agree with some of the actions some protesters take (and lets remember that there are proven antagonists within those crowds paid to cause violence and justify a crackdown), but I will defend the right people have to protest, however inconvenient it is to people who don't happen to agree with their political opinions.
It seems as though we have three groups of people on here...
There are those who scream about their rights, but quickly label anyone they don't agree with as "anarchists and communists" and make demands about removing their rights.
Then there are those who think that everything is planned by some gigantic centuries-old organization to usher in their dictatorship, while unable to offer evidence of it, while refusing to explain how it benefits those with the plan.
Then there are those that know the system is broken, that things need to change, and watch all these efforts with interest. They're generally sick of the people who immediately label any protester they disagree with an anarchist or communist and repeatedly expose those people for what they are.
Can you guess which one I am, and which you are?
Originally posted by michaelbrux
reply to post by frazzle
NATO hasn't even been able to win Afghanistan and seems to be near its own death. my opinion.
the people that came here are trying to hang that incompetent organization around the necks of people that are barely aware that such a thing exists.
NATO is headquartered in Belgium and is not by any stretch of the imagination an American, or Chicago, institution.
none of the American's that fight under their command have anything at all to do with America.
like I said...this is foreigners attempting to find a reason to make Americans uneasy.
Welcome to the Windy City...hope you have fun.